Road Cycling - Handlebar width

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




View Full Version : Handlebar width


Urbanmonk
02-01-04, 06:12 PM
Can anyone tell me how wide handlebars should be. I was measured online, and read that it directly correlates with your own shoulder width. Does this sound right? The handlebars on my new Cannondale seem a little narrower than my shoulders: by 2 inches. Concern warranted? Opinions welcomed.

Thanks for all your help,

Urbanmonk :D


Carbon120
02-01-04, 06:42 PM
Handlebar width is dictated by shoulder width - as a general starting point. I like wide bars - I ride 46cm width and these are a touch wider than my sholders. Wider bars give you more places to place your hands and I find that gives more options for comfort. The downside is that they allow for less aero position if riding on the hoods or in the drops. That said, I race on these bars and haven't found them to be hindering. Personal preference is the rule here - try some wider bars - you might like them.

RunYun
02-01-04, 06:49 PM
Just went from 42" on my old road bike to 44" in my new one and although I have not had it on the road yet I like it. I always felt a little restricted in my chest when riding. I think this will prove to be a positive change. All you can do is try it. Buy some cheap bars to start with and you can upgrade later if a different size works for you.


Michel Gagnon
02-01-04, 09:22 PM
Make that centimetres, please (unless you really arethat wide)!

I believe there is some fashion in it too. My 1980 commuter (it started its life as a touring bike) has handlebars that were considered normal for any good-size adult in those days: 39 cm centre to centre. They also have a "non-anatomical" shape (i.e. a single round) and are relatively shallow. My 2000 touring bike has 46-cm (centre to centre) handlebars with a deeper crve.

I find I tend to be faster, a tad more "aggressive" on my old bike whereas I am more relaxed on the new one. I tried to swap bars and realised that I definitely need wider bars with bar-end shifters. Pros and cons:
- I ride more nervously with the narrow bars, but I'm afraid it's simply because I am not as comfortable as I am with wider bars. Average speed might be 1 km/h higher with narrow bars, but I will get tired a few hours sooner.
- I can't say about any difference in hill climbing ability. The two bikes have different frame design issues and different gearing (especially in the low end), and I rarely use the commuter when fully loaded. Besides, I tend to climb slowly.
- Wider bars mean more stability with a tandem, trailercycle, heavy loads, strong crosswinds, etc.

That being said,my shoulder width is close to 42 cm, and I feel my "ideal" width would be 44 or 45 cm. IOW, 46 cm is a tad wide, but much more natural than 39 cm.

dexmax
02-02-04, 04:30 AM
I use a 44cm handlebar.. My shoulder width is 42cm. I like it slightly wider becuase I climb a lot.

Urbanmonk
02-02-04, 07:17 AM
Since the specs. in the manual didn't go as far as to tell me the width, I will take it to my LBS and have them measure while I try a few other bars in the shop. It's not killing me or anything, it's just not as comfortable as my old Motobecane (15 yrs. ago; never knew the bar width either). It may be, as some mentioned earlier, that I need to get used to the new compact design of this bike, and this is one aspect of that.
Thanks; greatly appreciated!

Urbanmonk

el Inglés
02-02-04, 09:43 AM
Theory says shoulder width but comfort is usually served by being 2 cm wider : advice from the bike shop guy , but for racing go for narrow and hang comfort .