Folding Bikes - Replacing Kenda Kwest with Schwalbe Big Apple. . .
Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
08-07-08, 06:49 PM
I don't know what inner tubes my Dahon has: will I likely need new tubes for the Big Apples (moving from 1.5 to 2) or will the stock one's be OK for extra inflation?
Are inner tubes much of a muchness in terms of weight and quality?
Schwalbe tubes are much much better quality.
08-07-08, 07:21 PM
stock ones will be ok..... but when you have the tires off you might as well use a pair of new tubes and keep the old ones as spares :-)
08-08-08, 05:07 AM
Having looked at inner tube sizes it seems they typically cover a 0.5" margin of inflation, so I assume my tubes are something like Kenda 1.25 - 1.75. Could they safely be inflated past that to 2, if I'm to keep them as spares?
08-08-08, 05:43 AM
+ 1 to Jur & Thor on above. Getting Schwalbe tyres & tubes together is best.
Do you want the big apples for a more more cushioned ride? If so they are great for that. If not I recommend the Marathon Plus for its excellent puncture resistance and strength. Still rolls very nicely too. Got them on ym 20" Downtube FS. See:
08-08-08, 05:58 AM
For comfort, yes.
I'm loving that model of Downtube, very tempting at the price.
I'm wondering, from a technical point of view, how inner tubes cope with being over-inflated?
08-08-08, 06:31 AM
I replaced the Swift's kenda kwest 1.5 with a Schwalbe Big Apple 2.0 without replacing the kenda's inner tube. The tube was rated 1.5 - 1.75. It's been two months now and it's still going strong. Some people said the Big Apple 2.0 is more like a 1.75.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.