Recumbent - Rans Fusion vs. True Recumbent

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.



PDA

View Full Version : Rans Fusion vs. True Recumbent

harris75
08-17-08, 06:54 PM
I'm looking for a new bike to hopefully eliminate the uncomfortableness of a DF bike. I'm sure the Fusion is not going to top a recumbent in comfort, but does anyone have any opinion on the comfortableness of the Fusion? In particular, with respect to the seat on the Fusion. Thanks

gcottay
08-17-08, 09:41 PM
I've only done a few miles on a Fusion, but found it a pleasant experience. I would not choose it over my Trice Q or Rans Rocket for a long distance, but would be happy to ride around the neighborhood or down a bike path on one.

In my humble opinion, test riding before buying is well worth the effort whether its a DF, CF or bent.
Doug5150
08-19-08, 03:04 AM
I'm looking for a new bike to hopefully eliminate the uncomfortableness of a DF bike. I'm sure the Fusion is not going to top a recumbent in comfort, but does anyone have any opinion on the comfortableness of the Fusion? In particular, with respect to the seat on the Fusion. Thanks
I have a early-2007.
It's a LOT better comfort than an upright, but you can't really change position on it. Pedaling while standing is out, and you're sitting fairly upright which makes riding a fast pace difficult. You won't need padded riding shorts however. I mostly ride mine wearing non-bicycling clothes.

Also it feels like a normal bike, as far as ease of riding. People can just get on it and go--unlike with true recumbents, that new people need some time to get used to steering and balancing.
~