timeUnit
09-05-08, 09:34 AM
Hi everyone, I'm new to this forum.
I have an idea of the perfect bike (for me) and would be really grateful for peoples opinions on this matter.
I ride my bike every day, to and from work. It's not very far, about 5 kms, and takes from 12 to 20 minutes depending on traffic and the weather. My bike is of course used for other things than riding to and from work (shopping, transporting stuff here and there), so I estimate I ride about 70 to 100 kms every week.
I live in Göteborg (or Gothenburg) on the west coast of Sweden. The weather here ranges from warm summer days (up to 30°C) to cold, wet winter days with strong wet (did I mention wet) winds. A really cold day here is about -10°C with those humid winds beating down on us from the ocean in the west. I imagine this weather is quite hard on the components of a bike.
The last couple of years I've had two bikes, one for summer and one for winter. Summer bike: Kona Jake (2003), winter bike: Trek 6700 SLR (2006). Right now I don't enjoy either that much.
The Kona has dropped bars, which is not very convenient when riding mainly in the city, nor do I find them very comfortable. The geometry of the frame makes my toes overlap with the front wheel. Something I swear over every now and then. Also, it has not been as durable as I hoped for. I've changed casettes, chains, bottom bracket cartridge and so many other things over the years that I've lost count. But what I dislike the most is the riding position. I find that I'm riding without holding the bars as often as I can, as this allows me to ride upright. But it's not very safe!
The Trek is an OK bike. It has held up pretty good, and I haven't needed to change that many parts. It is overkill for the climate we have here, though. I bought it because a very cold winter a few years ago made it downright suicidal to ride my Kona (ice and snow everywhere, and the rim brakes could hardly stop the bike), and therefore I ended up taking the tram or bus instead. I didn't like that. But the last two winters the Trek with its studded Nokian Hakkapelitta tyres and suspention for has just seemed heavy to ride.
Now I can't let go of the thought to put together a perfect city bike for the Swedish climate. I want it to be lightweight, simple, comfortable and good looking. And I seemed to have fallen in love with the classic european steel frames, like Mercian.
Here's a pretty good approximation of the bike I'm looking for, style wise:
http://www.jitensha.com/eng/8-07-650ebisu.html
I've come up with a list of features on my new bike that are essential.
1. Upright riding position, i.e. no dropped bars.
2. At least ONE non-rim brake (coaster, disc, drum), preferably coaster as it reduces the clutter on the handlebars.
3. Less than ten speeds.
4. Very low maintenance and hassle on the drivetrain/gears.
5. Mudguards.
6. Possibility of using studded tyres.
7. Possibility of a rear rack.
8. No toe/front wheel overlap.
At first I was thinking about using a Shimano Nexus 8 rear hub, but now I'm not so sure. Maybe three gears is more appropriate? KISS, you know.
I have very little knowledge on frame geometry, and would like some input in that area. I'm a fairly short fellow, 168 cm. The Kona I ride now is a 52 cm frame with a head tube angle of 70.7° and a seat tube angle of 72.7°. I guess that would be called a "relaxed" geometry, although I don't find it very relaxed.
Most of the steel frames I've been looking at have HTA's of around 72° and STA of 73-75°. If you put dropped bars on one of those it will be quite far from my Kona Jake (less "relaxed"). Are HTA's and STA's of 72-74° inappropriate to use with flat handlebars?
What rims are good for a bike like this? Lightweight is good, but I don't think those super modern rims look very good with a more classic bike.
Any input will be most appreciated!
Thanks!
Henning
I have an idea of the perfect bike (for me) and would be really grateful for peoples opinions on this matter.
I ride my bike every day, to and from work. It's not very far, about 5 kms, and takes from 12 to 20 minutes depending on traffic and the weather. My bike is of course used for other things than riding to and from work (shopping, transporting stuff here and there), so I estimate I ride about 70 to 100 kms every week.
I live in Göteborg (or Gothenburg) on the west coast of Sweden. The weather here ranges from warm summer days (up to 30°C) to cold, wet winter days with strong wet (did I mention wet) winds. A really cold day here is about -10°C with those humid winds beating down on us from the ocean in the west. I imagine this weather is quite hard on the components of a bike.
The last couple of years I've had two bikes, one for summer and one for winter. Summer bike: Kona Jake (2003), winter bike: Trek 6700 SLR (2006). Right now I don't enjoy either that much.
The Kona has dropped bars, which is not very convenient when riding mainly in the city, nor do I find them very comfortable. The geometry of the frame makes my toes overlap with the front wheel. Something I swear over every now and then. Also, it has not been as durable as I hoped for. I've changed casettes, chains, bottom bracket cartridge and so many other things over the years that I've lost count. But what I dislike the most is the riding position. I find that I'm riding without holding the bars as often as I can, as this allows me to ride upright. But it's not very safe!
The Trek is an OK bike. It has held up pretty good, and I haven't needed to change that many parts. It is overkill for the climate we have here, though. I bought it because a very cold winter a few years ago made it downright suicidal to ride my Kona (ice and snow everywhere, and the rim brakes could hardly stop the bike), and therefore I ended up taking the tram or bus instead. I didn't like that. But the last two winters the Trek with its studded Nokian Hakkapelitta tyres and suspention for has just seemed heavy to ride.
Now I can't let go of the thought to put together a perfect city bike for the Swedish climate. I want it to be lightweight, simple, comfortable and good looking. And I seemed to have fallen in love with the classic european steel frames, like Mercian.
Here's a pretty good approximation of the bike I'm looking for, style wise:
http://www.jitensha.com/eng/8-07-650ebisu.html
I've come up with a list of features on my new bike that are essential.
1. Upright riding position, i.e. no dropped bars.
2. At least ONE non-rim brake (coaster, disc, drum), preferably coaster as it reduces the clutter on the handlebars.
3. Less than ten speeds.
4. Very low maintenance and hassle on the drivetrain/gears.
5. Mudguards.
6. Possibility of using studded tyres.
7. Possibility of a rear rack.
8. No toe/front wheel overlap.
At first I was thinking about using a Shimano Nexus 8 rear hub, but now I'm not so sure. Maybe three gears is more appropriate? KISS, you know.
I have very little knowledge on frame geometry, and would like some input in that area. I'm a fairly short fellow, 168 cm. The Kona I ride now is a 52 cm frame with a head tube angle of 70.7° and a seat tube angle of 72.7°. I guess that would be called a "relaxed" geometry, although I don't find it very relaxed.
Most of the steel frames I've been looking at have HTA's of around 72° and STA of 73-75°. If you put dropped bars on one of those it will be quite far from my Kona Jake (less "relaxed"). Are HTA's and STA's of 72-74° inappropriate to use with flat handlebars?
What rims are good for a bike like this? Lightweight is good, but I don't think those super modern rims look very good with a more classic bike.
Any input will be most appreciated!
Thanks!
Henning
Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.