Road Cycling - Integrated headsets . . .

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




View Full Version : Integrated headsets . . .


Bobsled
12-29-01, 12:47 PM
engineering genius or crap?


velo
12-29-01, 01:59 PM
All the reviews that I've read in either magazines or on the internet have stated that there aren't any main drawbacks, but they're nothing special, so you don't have to waist your money on them. I wish I could find an article for you online, but I can't. I'll keep looking. Sorry I don't remember too much about them.

fubar5
12-29-01, 02:39 PM
Personally, I like the look of a integrated headset on a road bike. I wouldn't put one on a MTB, but on a road bike, I think it makes the lines look smoother, and I really like that. But looks have nothing to do with performance.:D


ahuman
12-29-01, 02:46 PM
I heard that most LBS dont know how to work on them and they
have to be sent back to the company to adust them.
I dont know how true that is.


K

velo
12-29-01, 03:51 PM
Originally posted by fubar5
Personally, I like the look of a integrated headset on a road bike.

Oh yeah, I can agree with that. The look is great, if that counts for anything.

I heard that most LBS dont know how to work on them and they
have to be sent back to the company to adust them.


:eek: Oh no! That's no good. My headsets are forever getting loose, and I have to stop in at the LBS to get them tightened again. I'm sure this happens to other people pretty often, too, because I've seen it happen. That is definitely a big downside.

roadbuzz
12-29-01, 04:15 PM
I think there was an article in Buycycling a few months ago that basically slammed them as being form not following function... a solution for a problem that didn't exist.

Personally, I don't care for the look, and I expect that they are harder to service, and/or will require special tools. Also, I wonder if the design is generic enough that it won't impose a lot of compatibility headaches between different frame manufacturers and component makers.

velocipedio
12-29-01, 05:40 PM
It really does look like it's more cosmetic than anything else. Integrated is hardly the revolution that thredless was -- and I think it's fair to say that threadless has ONLY just become universal in road bikes. It's going to be a while before integrated becames universal or even dominant.

Oscar
12-29-01, 08:22 PM
What's bad looking about a standard headset?

(Buycycling Magazine - that made me laugh. I just lapsed my subscription btw.)

blwyn
12-29-01, 09:25 PM
If the headset gets worn repairs will undoubtably be very expensive. I agree that it is a solution without a problem.

gmason
12-30-01, 02:43 AM
Buycycling

Perfect! But since it is the first one I found in English, I guess I will let my subscription finish out. They do have a real problem delivering it over here. Two issues (out of five) lost so far, and the last one was delivered postage due. Merry Christmas. :mad:

Cheers...Gary

roadbuzz
01-03-02, 10:29 AM
...and for that matter, what if the integrated headset does look better, it doesn't make up for the uglification factor of a threadless headset (in my opinion :mad: )