Road Cycling - long cage derail.

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
geneman
03-02-04, 02:22 PM
Ok, these are installed on triples but are they there to accomodate a larger cassette or because you need to take up slack from using a small chainring (like a 30)?
-mark
brokenrobot
03-02-04, 03:10 PM
Ok, these are installed on triples but are they there to accomodate a larger cassette or because you need to take up slack from using a small chainring (like a 30)?
-mark
Both? It's to account for a larger range. Either a small ring in the front with a normal-length chain or a bigger large cog in the rear with a correspondingly longer chain will result in more "droop" in some gear combination - the long cage is to take up that extra droop.
At least, that's what my novice logic sez ;)
-chris
Stubacca
03-02-04, 03:31 PM
It effectively accomodates both, but mostly works out to be about the range of the crankset (particularly on a triple, where you shouldn't need the biggest cassette sprockets). Both a short- and a long-cage rear derailleur specify the same maximum sprocket size (at least for Shimano, all = 27T).
The longer cage allows for more chain slack to be catered for through a larger total capacity (total capacity = front range [biggest crank ring - smallest ring] - rear range [biggest sprocket - smallest sprocket]).
I've just asked a question in the mechanics forum to help confirm my understanding for a cassette change I want to make... :) From what I figured out, on a standard double (39/53) the short cage derailleur will work with all Shimano road cassettes (largest they make is Ultegra 12/27).
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.