Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) - Cyclocross Fork for a Clyde?

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




View Full Version : Cyclocross Fork for a Clyde?


tribune
09-29-08, 05:37 PM
I need a strong fork for my 62cm surly cross check build. My main concern is a fork to strong enough for me (215+).

I am not looking to run disc brakes but I am going to be doing some double duty on this bike (commuting/city riding) so anything with eyelets is a bonus for mounting some fenders when the rain starts.

Any suggestions are appreciated!


c_m_shooter
09-29-08, 06:31 PM
What's wrong with the stock fork? It'll clear a 1.9" tire or a 45mm with fenders, and mine has been ridden down some mountain bike trails that no sane person would ride a Cyclocross bike down.

sstorkel
09-29-08, 06:34 PM
Any chro-moly cyclocross fork should be more than strong enough. Tange, Dimension, and Surly all have options available. Check Universal Cycles for some of the options.


late
09-29-08, 06:39 PM
Surly forks are quite heavy. How about a Winwood Muddy Cross?

Askel
09-30-08, 09:17 AM
I really like the Project Two on my Jake. It's definitely got some flex to it, so if you're running cantilever brakes, you'll want to make sure they're set up properly.

I've considered buying a Kona Unit 2-9 based solely on my positive experience with this fork.

And yeah, there are eyelets for fenders.

CliftonGK1
09-30-08, 09:58 AM
I ride a 62cm Cross Check with the stock fork, and at 250 pounds I'm not exactly "easy" on my equipment. There's nothing wrong with the stock Surly fork. I run the stock cantis with a canti-mounted front rack and SKS full fenders. I've swapped the stock wheel for one with a SON28 hub, and that hasn't posed any issues, either.

Sure, the steel fork isn't as light as a $270 Winwood. I'm not going to cry about getting some chips and dings in my $75 steel fork. A fork that costs 3/4 what my frame does, I'd be a bit more concerned about.

Askel
09-30-08, 10:23 AM
Oh yeah, if we're talking lightness, skip the Project 2. Mine comes in at 2.9 lbs. :eek:

CliftonGK1
09-30-08, 10:25 AM
Oh yeah, if we're talking lightness, skip the Project 2. Mine comes in at 2.9 lbs. :eek:

I weigh an eighth of a ton. I'm not gonna sweat it if there's an extra pound and a half on my bike. :rolleyes:

daintonj
09-30-08, 11:41 AM
I'd be quite happy with this and I weigh more than you. Not disc brake compatible.

http://www.wiggle.co.uk/p/Cycle/7/Kinesis_Crosslight_Pro_Carbon_Fork/5360026870/

tribune
10-06-08, 03:12 AM
After some consideration I'm going to be fair and give the Surly a try. If it doesn't work out, I'll be back!

CliftonGK1
10-06-08, 08:33 AM
I think you're going to be pleasantly surprised with the Surly fork. I'll have 3200 miles on mine at the end of today, and I've put it through some serious beatings without ever having a concern for its strength.

sstorkel
10-06-08, 10:33 AM
I've been very happy with the Surly Instigator fork I installed on my MTB. Like it much better than the Kona Project 2 fork it replaced; the Kona is well-built but but heavy and their description of the sizing was a bit misleading. My bike handles much better now that it has a fork of the appropriate length installed...