Mountain Biking - H/A on the Flow

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




View Full Version : H/A on the Flow


ed
10-07-08, 06:03 PM
The questions keep'a'coming.


So...the Rocky Mountain Flow has a 66.5' HA??? Kinda slack, is that really correct?
Is it with a 100mm fork
Would you go any bigger on the fork...say 140-150?


scrublover
10-07-08, 06:14 PM
That might be one of the DJ versions. The older Flow frames were more of just a beefy hardtail like you're looking for. The newer ones are more DJ setup. Linky to which one you're looking towards? Year? I had an 05 Flow frame briefly that was pretty damn nice, just a bit big for me. Got rid of it when the steel frame came around. If you could find one of the older more trail oriented models, that would rock for what you want!

If that HA is accurate, that's pretty damn slack for trailbike use with a 100mm fork. Hell, my hardtail is straight up 67 with a 160mm fork.

ed
10-07-08, 07:07 PM
It could be a DJ version...it's a 2008 Flow 1. Do they make 18" DJ bikes? That's kinda big.

Ya know...all I really want is a bike that I can take downtown and jump some stairs or 3-4footers. It would be nice if it can hang on the trail, that'll be okay too. Heck, I don't even go big on doubles or anything.


I have the 1998 Commode for our little Kansas trails.

http://i18.ebayimg.com/06/i/000/fd/20/d245_1.JPG
It's an 18". I really wonder if they have it listed right.

GEOMETRY:

HA 66.5

SA 71.5

TT 600MM

CS 425MM

SO 765MM

What say ye?


scrublover
10-07-08, 07:20 PM
Yep, that for sure is one of the newer versions. No idea if it really is that slack or not though. Email Rocky and see what they say?

If the rest of the numbers look good to you fit wise, it looks good. If it really is that steep with a 100mm fork, running it with anything taller would slack it way the hell out too far, IMO, for regular trail use. 66.5 seems awful slack for a DJ bike to me. Possibly a misprint on Rocky's part?



http://i18.ebayimg.com/06/i/000/fd/20/d245_1.JPG
It's an 18". I really wonder if they have it listed right.

GEOMETRY:

HA 66.5

SA 71.5

TT 600MM

CS 425MM

SO 765MM

What say ye?

ed
10-07-08, 07:47 PM
Doesn't look terribly slack here:
http://sunandskibikes.com/images/library/large/rmb_flow_1_blu_08_m.jpg

scrublover
10-07-08, 08:34 PM
Doesn't look terribly slack here:
http://sunandskibikes.com/images/library/large/rmb_flow_1_blu_08_m.jpg

Yeah. Methinks a misprint on the website. I'd still see what Rocky can tell you though, before plunking down money.

ed
10-08-08, 11:25 AM
I got an email from them saying that it's fact. It is designed for a 100mm fork to have 66.5' HA. Which may be a decent urban or DJ bike, I guess.