Touring - mountain bike for touring?

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
hedgeapple
11-25-08, 07:02 PM
Rather than buy a Long Haul Trucker with racks and bags for touring, as I've been planning, I'm considering using my Specialized Rockhopper instead. The plan: another set of wheels with more road-worthy tires, fenders, and one of those single-wheel trailers. May also change rings from 42/32/22 (more or less) to 48/??/??.
I may save money over the LHT, the Rockhopper would be more at home on trails and towpaths, and the trailer would be useful for commuting (can't see hauling a 50lb bag of critter feed home on an LHT). BTW, I live down 5 miles of farm road, and it's 8 miles to town.
Potential problems not resolved: I'd prefer drop bars (what would fit?) and what shifters/brake levers would work with drop bars? I'd also prefer friction shifters over indexed, if that's possible.
Anything else I should be considering?
The problem with road style handlebars is that you'll have to then invest in a new shifting system -be it bar end shifters or STI/Ergos. This will not be cheap! Instead, you might want to consider some trekking bars -this would allow you to keep your current shifters -the only thing you might need is a new stem and cables. I used trekking bars on my last tour and loved them -however, it's all horses for courses and what suits you. But for ~$50 (Nashbar specials and a new stem) and new cables (that you can still use if you choose not to keep the trekking bars) I'd say they are well worth giving them a shot instead of committing to new shifters.
Concerning the gearing, personally I'd stick with the same, unless you really know you'll be using a chainring bigger than 42 teeth -I think it would still give you around 22mph at 90rpm with a 13 teeth rear cassette cog. Now granted if you want to cycle down hills you'd want higher gearing, but fully loaded I'm happy just to glide down anyway. It's really up to you, but I'd recommend you use a gear ratio calculator to look long and hard at what your current gearing gives you versus how you really think you'll be using your gears. Everyone is different of course. Keep in mind most people will not come close to averaging 15mph touring fully loading in even very moderate terrain.
littlefoot
11-25-08, 11:22 PM
How old is your rockhopper? Going with drops shouldn't be too hard, if your bike uses v-brake you may have limited options for brake levers, canti brakes there are more options for,I personally like barcon shifters(barends) which can run index or friction. I run a weird nitto bar that is no longer made the on-one midge bar might be the closest thing to it. I like the wide sweep at the bottom of bars like this.
As was said you may want to stick with your present gearing and maybe tweak it a little bit overtime.
rodar y rodar
11-25-08, 11:25 PM
If you`re going to pull a trailer, your Rockhopper will probably do just fine as is. So far, my limited touring experience has been on my mountain bike- two weekend trips pulling a trailer with the bike itself set up just like I ride it on the single track and a four day trip with the addition of a front rack. I agree with Nigevy about the gearing. At least try it with your mtb gears and see if you ever find yourself wanting more. I have only a 22 and a 32 up front and I probably find myself wishing for my big ring about ten minutes out of every ten hours. I took it off long before I considered touring and I like it much better. How fast do you really want to pull a trailer, anyway? SInce the trailer carries most of the additional weight, your wheels should probably be enough unless you already have problems.
That said, I`m just starting to "roadiefy" my Uncle`s old Schwinn mtb for a dedicated touring bike. Shifters aren`t all that expensive. I just ordered a pair of Ultegra 8s barends for under $60:
http://www.jensonusa.com/store/product/SL407A09-Shimano+Ultegra+8+Speed+Bar+End+Shifters.aspx
While I was at it, I ordered a Deore RD for about $30 (the one already on that bike looks pretty short- don`t think it`ll handle my 11-32 cassette). Brake levers run about $25 if you buy them brand new (for standard cantis, a bit more for V-brakes). Racks and panniers can get expensive, but you`d still need them if you bought a whole bike. Give some thought to those trekking bars mentioned if you want to avoid buying shifters and brake levers.
EDIT: For what it`s worth, all indexed Shimano barend and downtube shifters can be instantly run in friction mode just by turning a little wire bail with your fingers. Somebody please correct me if there are a few models out there that don`t work that way.
rodar y rodar
11-25-08, 11:42 PM
Oh yeah- a fifty pound bag of critter food should work on a LHT also as long as you have a good way to tie it down.
Compatbility: For "normal" drop bars or "Midge-type" bars, the most common options are either STI (or other companies` comparable offerings) or barends plus brake only levers. Either option is very straight up. For Trekking bars, you have the same shifter and brake options you have for flat bars. If you buy new bars, you need to check the stem clamp diameter. Very likely you`ll need a shorter stem anyway.
BengeBoy
11-25-08, 11:56 PM
I just finished a project like this, and posted the results on the 50+ forum. This is an old Stumpjumper, which will be my foul-weather commuter this summer and potential tourer/fire road camping bike next summer.
I went w/Trekking bars, because it was so cheap (got $18 bars from Nashbar plus a $15 stem)...I figure that I can always switch to drops somewhere in the future (which requires new handlebars, bar end shifters, cables, brake handles.). I am liking the Trekking bars more than I thought I would...but if it were my main bike I'd likely change them to drops.
http://i38.tinypic.com/b5g000.jpg
Here is the story of the conversion plus photos from the 50+ forum.
http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=488973
IntoThickAir
11-26-08, 12:01 AM
I admit that I've never tried trekking bars, but I've converted a 'hybird' bike with flat bars to touring drops and bar-end shifters. I thought it worth the money, since I already liked the bike's geometry, and it felt much the same afterwards. As for the gearing, I agree with the other posts: keep the current set-up. You may be hoping for more speed when you head downhill with that sack of chicken scratch, but it's better to keep it under thirty miles per hour with 50 pounds on your trailer.
Unless you want a thrill.
Yours,
Littlefoot makes some good points -if your Rockhopper has V's, brake lever choices on a road handlebar are going to be less and probably more expensive. I think this is another good reason to try the trekking bars first unless you know 100% you do want road bars and know what kind of brake/lever setup you want.
How old is your rockhopper? Going with drops shouldn't be too hard, if your bike uses v-brake you may have limited options for brake levers, canti brakes there are more options for
Oooh that's one nice conversion there BengeBoy, very very nice indeed. I got a Specialized Hard Rock frame from a junkyard for $4, and it has been built up (also with trekking bars, regular brake mounts though) as my secondary tourer. The only problem is that I loathe the colour -sort of a putrid blue/green/torquoise and have often thought of getting it repainted.
Here is the story of the conversion plus photos from the 50+ forum.
http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=488973
TheBrick
11-26-08, 06:38 AM
These bar end are expensive but worth considering as you can keep all you existing shifters e.t.c so save moeny in that respect.
http://www.sjscycles.co.uk/product-Origin8-Origin8-Pro-pulsion-road-ends-drop-bar-bar-ends-black-18606.htm
BigBlueToe
11-26-08, 08:56 AM
I've toured on a mountain bike (an old, rigid Stumpjumper) with straight bars and bar-ends, on a touring bike pulling a Bob, and on a touring bike with front and back panniers. I prefer the latter. However, if I had a Rockhopper and limited money, I'd be fine with using it to pull the Bob. I'd leave the gears alone. Low gears are much more important than high when you're carrying a lot of weight on tour. Changing to drop handlebars is certainly possible, and I've seen people do it, but it involves a lot of added expense to change things over - maybe enough that you might be better off just buying a drop-bar touring bike.
I've never used trekking bars, but they make sense and a lot of people praise them.
You have options.
P. S. My Stumpjumper and my Bob have now hooked up and they're my shopping rig. I'm going to the store today to get groceries for Thanksgiving. I should be able to fit everything on the Bob. I need a new 50-lb. bag of dog food though. I wonder if that would fit. Hmmmmmm
Rather than buy a Long Haul Trucker with racks and bags for touring, as I've been planning, I'm considering using my Specialized Rockhopper instead.
http://www.vwvagabonds.com/images/BikesRichsBike.JPG
Here is a Specialized Rockhopper (http://www.vwvagabonds.com/Bike/BikeTheBikes.html) turned touring bike that was low cost...:thumb:
knobster
11-26-08, 10:09 AM
I did this type of conversion last year with a 1987 Bianch Grizzly. It wasn't cheap by any stretch but it was more of a project and I had a lot of fun putting it together.
Powdercoated the frame and everthing else was purchased new. Great riding bike. Quite a bit less than a LHT in cost.
http://www.tranquilitysystems.com/gallery/files/1-Merckx009.jpg
surreal
11-26-08, 04:56 PM
I'm assuming you have a fairly recent spesh, with a 1.125" steerer and v-brakes or discs, but with v-brake mounts?). Let's compare some options. (much of this has been said above, and by repeating it here, i'm effectively agreeing with what has been said.)
New LHT complete is $1075 +/-
Converting a specialized, no holds barred: (assuming new prices; less if you buy used)
*shimano9 speed barcons: $100
*drop brake levers $33 (any of the cheaper, shimano r400, cane creek, diacompe, tektro)
*drop bars- let's budget $35, really, much of it depends on your stem and finding the proper clamp size. this is somewhere you might wanna buy used. If you need to replace the stem and the bar, you could still do it easily for under $50. if you have a 25.4mm stem, I can send you an old bar in silver, with ancient drop bar levers, compatible with cantis, for just shipping cost. for the sake of geometry, you may want to fiddle with your stem length/angle anyway
*cantis (assuming you have v's or discs. if you already have canti's, no cost! just get new shoes.) $70/pair (shimano, cane creek, tektro, cheaper new ones go for $35/each)
*tires $80 or so (marathon plus or similar.)
*treat yourself to some new powder: $150 +/- (totally unneccessary, but fun.)
*rigid fork (trust me. you might not need it, but you'll want it $70 or less, all sorts of steerers, on bikeman for kona p2 (great fork, but no lowrider bosses.)
*you may want to buy the trailer, or you may want to buy racks/bags. but, the lht doesn't come with either anyway.
***total is way cheaper than lht complete
hth
-rob
BengeBoy
11-26-08, 05:12 PM
total is way cheaper than lht complete
My total - even with a very nice powdercoat job - was about half the price of a Surly LHT.
rodar y rodar
11-26-08, 07:22 PM
New LHT complete is $1075 +/-
Converting a specialized, no holds barred: (assuming new prices; less if you buy used)....
***total is way cheaper than lht complete
That "no holds barred" part is what makes the difference. I don`t think the OP was talking about that kind of build. Besides that, he`s end up with a COOLER ride! Nothing against LHTs, I`d love to have one. But they`re all the same. This thread, on the other hand, has some COOL stuff!
hedgeapple
11-26-08, 09:54 PM
My Rockhopper (call it a Plophopper, I live on a farm - which reminds me, I'd want fenders, too) is an '06 with V-brakes and front suspension.
About brakes - I love the v-brakes. This bike is my first experience with them, and they are one of the reasons I'm considering this. Rob, you seem to be suggesting cantis are better. I've no experience with cantis. Can you elaborate?
About front suspension - I like the idea of simplicity. My bike's Rocks are fine on farm roads and I'd think they'd be okay with a Bob trailer tagging along, but truth is I'd feel better with regular forks for traveling. Is rigid truly preferable? Is bikeman a supplier? And the kona p2, a fork?
Regarding gearing: I'd consider larger rings because I won't be towing all the time, and I'm assuming the more streetable tires I'd be running would be smaller in profile and rolling diameter than the 26x2" lugged mountain bike tires I'm currently running, and that they'd take more air pressure and have less rolling resistance. Even so, I hear what everyone is saying and it makes sense.
I'm not familiar with trekking bars. Is that what you call the butterfly/BMW-kidney-grill-shaped bars that are shown in some the photos here? Lots of hand positions available with those, and my stock shifters and brake levers ought to work with them.
Lots of good input here folks, and thanx a bunch for it! I'm pretty green, I just started riding again last March after a 22-year lapse. Just finished upgrading my old Raleigh GP (bought new in '72, added 700 wheels and Sora crank kit) and will ride it in RAGBRAI in '09. After that, I want something better suited for self-supported touring. That's where the Rockhopper comes in. I bought it in August '06 because I wanted to ride again and it suited our farm roads. Looks like I can use it for much more.
BengeBoy
11-26-08, 10:24 PM
I'm not familiar with trekking bars. Is that what you call the butterfly/BMW-kidney-grill-shaped bars that are shown in some the photos here? Lots of hand positions available with those, and my stock shifters and brake levers ought to work with them.
Yes, trekking bars are what you call some of the bars pictured above.
Two sources:
- BikeNashbar, $17.95 (I think)
- Harris Cyclery
The Harris site has a good article about them as well:
http://www.sheldonbrown.com/deakins/handlebars.html
A mountain bike with smooth tires would be perfect for cruising the backroads of Harvey County...
Newspaperguy
11-26-08, 10:31 PM
Regarding gearing: I'd consider larger rings because I won't be towing all the time, and I'm assuming the more streetable tires I'd be running would be smaller in profile and rolling diameter than the 26x2" lugged mountain bike tires I'm currently running, and that they'd take more air pressure and have less rolling resistance. Even so, I hear what everyone is saying and it makes sense.
I used to use a mountain bike for touring. It worked quite nicely and it gave me the flexibility to ride on anything from smooth pavement to railway beds and logging roads. If you're planning any touring that will take you off the main highways, the Rockhopper will suit your purposes.
I just looked up the specs for the 2007 Rockhopper. If yours is the same, with 11-32 in the rear cluster, you should be able to get away with something like 48/36/24 in the front. That would give you something good for road riding while keeping a decent low end for climbing. While you want larger rings, make sure you have low gears for wind or hills.
You can get narrower tires that will still fit your rims. They'll make a huge difference and you won't lose out on the farm roads. Also, when you're looking for tires, try to find something with a smoother tread rather than rough knobbies. The smoother tire will make your life a lot easier. If you're planning to do a lot of your touring on rough roads, get a smoother tire in the back and put a more aggressive tread in front.
sunburst
11-27-08, 12:23 AM
I've got an old purple rigid Rockhopper that I always thought would work fine for touring, especially if I converted it to Midge bars with barcons like my touring bike. Just adding $10-15 barends helps with the hand positions. The gearing is already good. I switched to Kenda 26x1.5 semi-slicks, which really improved the street ride and efficiency.
forresterace
11-27-08, 07:06 AM
I think what a lot of people are missing here is that in converting a mountain bike to a touring bike it is best to start with an older bike (80's or early 90's) that is steel framed and no suspension. This era frame should have lugs for mounting fenders and racks. The Rockhopper is just one example. The Specialized Stumpjumper or many other makes of the same vintage would work as well.
I just picked up an early 90's steel Rockhopper for $30, for just such a long termed project. The owner wants to keep the pretty orange drive train (?) which is fine. All I really want is the frame & fork.
Doug
BengeBoy
11-27-08, 09:22 AM
I think what a lot of people are missing here is that in converting a mountain bike to a touring bike it is best to start with an older bike (80's or early 90's) that is steel framed and no suspension. This era frame should have lugs for mounting fenders and racks. The Rockhopper is just one example. The Specialized Stumpjumper or many other makes of the same vintage would work as well.
+1
This is a great point.
Some other bikes to look at like this were the Trek 900 series....when I was searching for my bike there also were bikes I saw from Gary Fisher, Nishiki (the Colorado); Fuji; Univega, and of course Bridgestone that would have worked.
For the most part they are cheaper than good "touring" bikes of the same era. Try Craigslist or just go into eBay, which allows you to search by frame material.
andym123
11-27-08, 09:40 AM
I've read books by people who've gone round the world on a bog-standard rockhopper. Fully-loaded with panniers. Standard gearing. So yes it's do-able, and my advice would be to keep things simple and not think you have spend a fortune rebuilding the thing, buying trailers yadda yadda.
So far as brakes and drops are concerned, the simplest solution (if you decide to go for drops) is to go with brakes designed for use with Vs (I've got Dia-Compe 287Vs but I think the name has changed).
So far as shifters are concerned, you need to get Shimano bar end shifters (and use them in friction mode - easier than it sounds). You can either stick them in the bar end, or set them up as thumbies. I don't know where SJS get their thumbies from, but they look very much like the thumbies from Paul Components (http://www.paulcomp.com/) so (assuming you are in the US) you can get them without having to have stuff shipped from the UK. They do them in 26mm so compatible with drop bars as well. I use them and they are very good.
hedgeapple
11-28-08, 09:34 AM
I've got an old purple rigid Rockhopper that I always thought would work fine for touring, especially if I converted it to Midge bars with barcons like my touring bike.
More new stuff for me: what are Midge bars and barcons?
TheBrick
11-28-08, 10:04 AM
Midge bars (http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Midge%20bars)
Barcons (http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=Barcons+shifters&btnG=Search&meta=)
hedgeapple
11-29-08, 06:39 AM
Wellll, duh. Still a digital dummy. Keep forgeting that I can answer anything if I google it, which is fine for hardware but I half suspect that's how we determine foreign policy in this country.
A midge with what I'd call a set of bar-ends (friction) could do it.
Freewheeler
11-29-08, 03:39 PM
1993 Reynolds 501 Dawes frame. Rough road tires on, I have some Vittoria Randonneurs for road only.
TheBrick
11-29-08, 04:30 PM
Wellll, duh. Still a digital dummy. Keep forgeting that I can answer anything if I google it, which is fine for hardware but I half suspect that's how we determine foreign policy in this country.
A midge with what I'd call a set of bar-ends (friction) could do it.
Sorry was not trying to be an ass hole just pushing in the right direction.:)
A friend of mine has the midge bars and he likes the flared aspect of them but finds that the bit between the hoods and the tops (the sides I guess) a bit short so if you are into riding in that position it maybe worth considering another set of flared drops. I know there are some more out there but don't know what they are off the top of my head. Happy hunting.
rodar y rodar
11-29-08, 06:40 PM
Get the Midges. If you don`t tlike them, send them to me so I can try them too :D
I`ve been thinking about putting them on our slightly too long tandem but I can`t find any locally and I don`t want to shell out untill I can at least grab a pair with my own hands and see how I like them.
I'm not sure why there's such a bias towards drop bars - most people internationally seem to use flat or "comfort" bars.
I say stick with the current bike; try some long rides with bar ends and if you have a problem then you can try trekking bars or borrow a bike with drops for a day to see if you prefer them.
Yes, I think Cave has an excellent point -why change if you don't need to? Though I personally prefer trekking bars, it certainly does not make sense to change your current setup if you don't need to. try riding with your flats and see how you feel.
I'm not sure why there's such a bias towards drop bars - most people internationally seem to use flat or "comfort" bars.
I say stick with the current bike; try some long rides with bar ends and if you have a problem then you can try trekking bars or borrow a bike with drops for a day to see if you prefer them.
hedgeapple
11-30-08, 01:09 PM
No offense taken, Brick. I reserve the right to laugh at myself when appropriate (rarrrre as that might be:>)). My guess is your photo is from the lake district? Did 2 years at RAF Mildenhall.
About changing bars: No need, no change, no argument. I have the stock bars, which angle my wrists outward more than I find comfortable. They're also a bit wide. I've already added bar ends and they do help but, again, the bar is a bit wide. I have drops on my old Raleigh GP (had it in the UK) and I used to spend most of my riding time down on them, but that was decades ago. My gut gets in the way now (I'm working on that), but I'm still more comfortable using the middle flats on my drop bars than I am with any position currently available on the Rockhopper. Furthermore, the stock bars make a sail of me in a Kansas headwind.
BTW, I commuted on the Rockhopper this past summer, 10.5 miles one-way, half on pavement, half on farm roads.
Ive been travel with my Miyata Elevation 2000 mod1993 with few modifications and was great!. But I still looking for the classic Miyata 1000.-
badger1
11-30-08, 06:11 PM
FWIW, I'll chime in here: we all (self included) have a tendency to overthink things. I've become interested in touring, and use (only bike) a 'roadified' hardtail mtb (pretty much like a Rockhopper) -- with disc brakes (heresy!). So, what to do? Should I buy a dedicated touring bike, blah blah blah ... I 'need' drops ... blah blah blah. What I did: started looking around the web/looking in at touring blogs, online journals, etc. and realized many of the hardest, longest tours have been undertaken on 'what ya got'! What I did: put on flat bars/bar ends (like you, didn't like wide risers), put on a rack and rigid fork, and started trying longer rides. 4 hours? Fine. 6 hours? Fine. Have got up (this past summer) to a couple of overnighters, doing 7 hours each day with a moderate load. Worked. Covered lots of ground, stayed comfortable, no worries. So my advice: take what you have, do any slight mods you think might help, and try it out. Just sayin!
thecrunge
12-01-08, 10:01 AM
Ive been travel with my Miyata Elevation 2000 mod1993 with few modifications and was great!. But I still looking for the classic Miyata 1000.-
Barato, who makes the kickstand on your Miyata? Looks very sturdy and lightweight.
The other thing that can help with flat bars is to shorten them - they always come really wide. You can get a tubing cutter for 10 bucks that works better than a hacksaw for the job.
Other things I've seen are aero bars on flats, also do a forum search on antler bars for a larf.
surreal
12-01-08, 05:25 PM
Sorry i never responded to this. i've been away a while.
My Rockhopper (call it a Plophopper, I live on a farm - which reminds me, I'd want fenders, too) is an '06 with V-brakes and front suspension.
About brakes - I love the v-brakes. This bike is my first experience with them, and they are one of the reasons I'm considering this. Rob, you seem to be suggesting cantis are better. I've no experience with cantis. Can you elaborate?.
As brakes, v-brakes are vastly superior. Stronger braking, easier set-up, cheaper, easier in general. But, for a touring bike, I'd say the canti's are the better choice (even if they're not a better brake) because they whave a straddle cable that'll allow the use of fenders and they work with standard dropbar levers. Diacompe used to/still does make a v-brake compat (ie, longpull) drop lever, and tektro does too. I've heard that the braking feel sucks with these levers, but I've never used them. But, eitherway, if you wat to run full-coverage fenderas (and you should), the canti's will make it all possible.
About front suspension - I like the idea of simplicity. My bike's Rocks are fine on farm roads and I'd think they'd be okay with a Bob trailer tagging along, but truth is I'd feel better with regular forks for traveling. Is rigid truly preferable? Is bikeman a supplier? And the kona p2, a fork?.
Running front racks (if you decide to) and full fenders (which you'll want to) is easier on the rigid fork. Also, if we're talking about the type of fork that comes with the basic 'hopper in 2006, the thing doesn't have lockout. So, you'll be bouncing alot, which'd bother me. Plus, the rigid fork is far lighter. So, yeah, rigid is lighter, more efficient, and more compatible with stuff someone is likely to put on a tour bike. And, all for $60. Bikeman.com is a decent online retailer, and mr. carver carries the kona project 2 rigid chromoly fork, for cheap.
Regarding gearing: I'd consider larger rings because I won't be towing all the time, and I'm assuming the more streetable tires I'd be running would be smaller in profile and rolling diameter than the 26x2" lugged mountain bike tires I'm currently running, and that they'd take more air pressure and have less rolling resistance. Even so, I hear what everyone is saying and it makes sense..
I used to rock the 48/36/26 cranks with an 11-34 on a 26" bike with marathon+1.75" tires. I'm building my next bike with the standard 44/32/22 gearing because, ebven with the smaller wheels and slicker tires, you don't ever need anything more than a 44/11 combo, but fully loaded uphill, you might want some truly grandma gears. Plus, in your case, you'd save money by not having to update the chainset with new rings. Good rings ain't cheap. Spend that money on other good stuff, ride it like that, and if you feel like you're spinning out the 44/11 (not likely) then move to bigger rings.
I'm not familiar with trekking bars. Is that what you call the butterfly/BMW-kidney-grill-shaped bars that are shown in some the photos here? Lots of hand positions available with those, and my stock shifters and brake levers ought to work with them..
Quite right. You'd save a lot on shifters and possibly brake levers with this set-up, but you'll need to rock clip-on type fenders most likely.
A lot of people are giving you excellent advice here, but the only one with any real answers is you. In truth, you could just grab a trailer and have at it with the existing bike. If you'd like, you can get the moto-style fenders front and rear for crazy cheap if that's bothering you. Slicker tires is another cheap modification. Or, you could go nuts and make everything more "tourish". And, there's a million points of middle ground (trekking bars,short-pull mtb-style levers <$20>, real fenders, slick tyres would be cheap and solve most of your problems) for you to explore. Personally, I have some (not much) disposable income, so i tend to buy stuff and experiemnt frequently. Not everyone has the attitude or cash for that, but I do. I'd say, start small. Implement little changes at first, ride like that, and make bigger moves as needed. But, it's all personal preference, so do what feels right.
hth,
-rob
hedgeapple
12-01-08, 08:05 PM
- which is precisely the plan. Harvey County's East Lake Park (a popular camping spot for riders on the Trans-America Trail, I think) is less than 6 miles from my place on farm roads. Starting in March or April of next year, I plan to spend at least one friday night a month (in-season) camping there, on the Rockhopper. At first I'll take only a sleeping bag, ensolite pad and pup tent, all of which I think can be stowed on the rear rack I already have. In that manner I will develop/accumulate technique/equipment through fall.
I was looking for my tube cutter last night; couldn't find it (spotty memory suggests it is out on what someone else would call permanent loan if he would consider the matter at all), but shortening the bars is the first thing I will attempt (I've had good luck with this on my motorcycles). As for purchase: this will certainly seem counter-intuitive, but I suspect the first thing I'll buy will be the trailer, simply because I'll be able to use it while commuting (see 50lb bag of critter food, above). It will help keep me out of the F250 and on the bike. By the end of riding season, I'm sure I'll have some idea of how to handle gearing.
With the trailer, and the summer's experience at East Lake, I may do an over-nighter in October to West Lake Park, which is about 25 miles away in the other end of the County.
I am certainly short of funds - I have a farm to support, y'know - but I have plenty of time, so any mods to the Rockhopper will happen slowly. I plan to do the RAGBRAI on the Raleigh with my brother next July, and in '10 I plan to do it self-supported on the Rockhopper.
I really appreciate everyone's response. I am learning things here. Seen some sharp bikes, too.
Nycycle
12-01-08, 10:33 PM
hedgeapple, It WILL WORK just fine, I used my Hardrock, but the Rockhpper is an even better choice, Excellent for pulling trailers, I put Nashbar Trekking bars on mine and changed the cassette, off road gearing not the best. I pull a Nashbar Trailer and am going again in the spring YAHOOOO!
Oh I got fenders and them Specialized Armadildo tires, zero flats, zero, and I pump em up to 80 PSI for a nice roll, LOVE IT.
Here is a pic before I changed the bars and put fenders on and all, .
I bought it in www.cykloteket.se
hedgeapple
12-02-08, 05:05 PM
Good "put your bike here" picture, now I'm really motivated.
Is that a rigid fork? If so, is it worth the effort, with and/or without the trailer?
You have the rigid trailer. Did you consider the trailer with suspension?
Karloman
12-03-08, 03:11 AM
Old rigid mountain bikes are perfect for touring. They have tough frames, big clearances, long chainstays, braze-ons for everything and can be quite light when middle to high end of the range.
They can be found for cheap, 50 to 100 euros in Europe, and in very good condition. Apart from a good cleaning/servicing, they usually only need, as a minimum, an up-angled stem, a rear luggage rack and tires with smooth tread, that's another 80 euros.
On my bike I also put on raised bar, SKS mudguards when needed, front rack, not counting my Brooks saddle that goes from a bike to another.
Converting a MTB is definitely worth for somebody who doesn't have a big budget or not keen on spending a lot before being really hooked on touring.
My latest conversion for rough stuffing is this 1995 Giant Terrago. I love it although the head tube is a bit short.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3078/2650038009_ac65faac9b.jpg
Karl
surreal
12-03-08, 01:00 PM
I'd say the trailer would be the first and wisest purchase, with fenders and preferred tyres being next.
You're in for a fun experience, if you like fiddling with and assembling stuff (and, if you cut the bars on your motorbike, i reckon you do. ) you'll learn a lot about compatability and what works best, both for you specifically and in general.
-rob
rodar y rodar
12-08-08, 09:39 AM
Good "put your bike here" picture, now I'm really motivated.
Is that a rigid fork? If so, is it worth the effort, with and/or without the trailer?
You have the rigid trailer. Did you consider the trailer with suspension?
You`re asking about Nycycle`s post, aren`t you? Since there`s no answer there, it looks to me like a pair of Nashbar trailers (shorter pivot tube than BOBs). They`re a budget option, availale in nonsuspension only for about $100 I think. There was another on the market for a while that I think was the same trailer with a different name. Do a site search on them if you`re interrested- somebody who has both (Nashbar and BOB) posted a comparrison a few months ago.
About the fork, it looks like a suspension fork on the Stumpy to me. Suspension or rigid is a matter of prefference- some folks go for each of them. For anybody without a strong opinion either way, it`s probably just as well to "run what ya brung" until you have reason to change. As a lucky guy soon to have TWO mounts to ride the range on, I`ll have both. My mountain bike has air spring suspension (a big no-no according to a lot of people) and my "road" tourer will have a rigid fork with no mid fork rack mount.
V-brakes and fenders can definitely work together. My daily ride has both and I have no idea what the supposed problem is. Gratuitous pictures of my mountain bike (take note of the enormous chainrings) in its touring costume:
http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/pics/docs/00/00/42/98/small/CIMG4444.jpg?v=2v
http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/pics/docs/00/00/42/98/small/CIMG4572.jpg?v=29
http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t218/brianylupita/Bizz%20Johnson/CIMG2609.jpg?t=1228754214
hedgeapple
12-09-08, 05:29 PM
Okay, so Nashbar also markets trailers. I hadn't picked up on that, I'll check it out. In comparing photos I can see differences in the frames as well.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.