"The 33"-Road Bike Racing - power weight ratio

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




View Full Version : power weight ratio


flyguy676
12-01-08, 11:46 PM
whats a good max power for someone weighing 155 lbs?


ridethecliche
12-01-08, 11:51 PM
Consult the e-wang chart courtesy of Coggan et al.

http://www.cyclingpeakssoftware.com/images/powerprofile_v4.gif

flyguy676
12-01-08, 11:59 PM
thanks cliche, i think were the only ones up. since ur the only one to answer both my post


waterrockets
12-02-08, 12:00 AM
Just curious, what do you mean by "max power?"

For common durations Coggan's chart above is a reasonable yard stick, especially when comparing to your own history.

flyguy676
12-02-08, 12:05 AM
well i did a vq training session and i did a 30 sec all out effort and got just under 1000 watts.

waterrockets
12-02-08, 12:15 AM
What's a vq?

AlexTaylor
12-02-08, 03:29 AM
What is the best way to determine FT? I think that I am off the bottom of the chart!

waterrockets
12-02-08, 05:29 AM
http://www.osbmultisport.com/articles/7deadly.html

AlexTaylor
12-02-08, 06:28 AM
Poifick! Cheers WR :)

I'm at the top of the 'untrained' category on that w/kg list :(

MDcatV
12-02-08, 07:03 AM
well i did a vq training session and i did a 30 sec all out effort and got just under 1000 watts.

not sure what you're trying to say here.

was the "just under 1000W" a peak power or was it your avg. power for the 30"? if it was your avg. for the 30" then you're either a world class professional or have a calibration issue with your watt-o-meter.

flyguy676
12-02-08, 08:01 AM
vq is robbie ventura's coaching thing. theres one here in orlando, chicago and one being built somewhere out west. the "just under a 1000 watts was peak power.

ericm979
12-02-08, 08:13 AM
This last season my best 5sec power was 926. I weigh in the low 140s and I think I am a poor sprinter. But other than going for sprints in group rides I don't do any training for short term power. If I worked on it more I could improve it.

Unless your sprint is uphill, power/weight is less important than just plain power.

waterrockets
12-02-08, 08:16 AM
vq is robbie ventura's coaching thing. theres one here in orlando, chicago and one being built somewhere out west. the "just under a 1000 watts was peak power.

You really don't have enough information for any sort of assessment.

flyguy676
12-02-08, 08:44 AM
what data do i need then?

waterrockets
12-02-08, 08:58 AM
Well, if you want to see a profile that would fit into a chart like the one above, then you'd want to get a series of mean-maximal power tests done. The common ones for the profile above would be 5s, 1m, 5m, and FTP. There are several ways of estimating FTP w/in 10W without actually doing an hour long TT. These tests would have to be done when you're well rested and healthy, and they need to be truly maximal efforts -- no way you could have possibly gone harder.

8Lives
12-02-08, 09:32 AM
I had a performance assessment done earlier this year. It was a 48th b-day present and I figured it would give me a good baseline after a year of cycling (after about 17 years off the bike). They used the terms VT1 and VT2, with VT1 being the lactate threshold (64% of VO2 max) and VT2 being the "'onset of blood lactate accumulation" (86% of V02 max) - which by their description seems equivalent to FT. The VT2 (OBLA) is defined as the point where the increase in blood lactate can no longer achieve a prolonged steady state.

So does this sound like VT2 is FT? Based on heart rate it is right in my TT and hill climb zone, but I am nomenclature confused!

waterrockets
12-02-08, 09:41 AM
Is that ventilatory threshold? I don't know much about the implications in that area. If the HR lines up though, then it's probably about right. Power is a good way to view it though, as you can train to produce much more power at a given HR, but just using an HRM won't allow you to measure the gains.

8Lives
12-02-08, 10:43 AM
Good question - and I think the answer is yes, defining two threshold states. What I had for numbers is:

V02 Max: 68.5
Vt2 (which I think is FT): 290 watts, 4.3 w/kg
VT1: 220 watts, 3.2 w/kg (this was at an HR of 161 which is about top of zone 3 for me)

thanks for the assist in understanding these. The watts per kg seem better than I'd have thought but the effort/HR puts it where I would expect.

bodaciousguy
12-02-08, 03:29 PM
Taylor Phinney has a max power of 1800 watts and he's 180 lbs. The 5s sprint isn't far from that. I'd say: multiply your peak by 96% to get your 5s power or divide your 5s power by 96% to get max power.

waterrockets
12-02-08, 03:37 PM
FWIW, my best 5s power last season is 94% of my peak power.

dmotoguy
12-02-08, 03:46 PM
96% definitely sounds high for most (non track) riders..

ZeCanon
12-02-08, 04:08 PM
My best 5s is also 94% of my peak

umd
12-02-08, 05:37 PM
I just calculated out that my 5s is about 93% of my peak

MDcatV
12-02-08, 07:37 PM
my 5s max is 94.83163665% of my peak, approximately.

ridethecliche
12-02-08, 08:40 PM
Heh, mine was a little over 94% too. Interesting.

snoboard2
12-03-08, 07:04 AM
94% here as well. Cool

currand
12-03-08, 09:35 PM
Methinks there's a more mathematical than physiological explanation for this statistic. But WTF do I know...

kudude
12-03-08, 10:33 PM
5 data pts, per sample. Highest = peak, average = 5s wattage.

How fast is the average anaerobic burnout? probably (relatively) much more than 5s, so personal variation plays little role at this timescale. Couple that with the assumption of some sort of lorentzian that is sampled VERY sparsely, I'm not surprised that the variation in between 'highly-trained athletes' (you guys own powermeters so that counts for something) is small

eskimo85
12-08-08, 11:29 PM
1300 is solid.

vladav
12-09-08, 08:14 AM
Uhhhhhhhh what does this mean?

1314/1433 = 0.916
1258/1387 = 0.906
1221/1364 = 0.895

I'm taking the 3 bests (1s,5s from PT) not necessarily on the same day...

waterrockets
12-09-08, 08:24 AM
Uhhhhhhhh what does this mean?

1314/1433 = 0.916
1258/1387 = 0.906
1221/1364 = 0.895

I'm taking the 3 bests (1s,5s from PT) not necessarily on the same day...

If those weren't tests, then they're meaningless. A 7% variance in 5s power suggests that these were not all-out tests.

Also, I compare the peak and 5s from the same actual sprint.

ZeCanon
12-09-08, 08:48 AM
Indeed, I took mine from a sprint at the end of a short crit I won last year. 1408 peak, 1323 5s average = ~94%.
I had basically zero fatigue, and with the added adrenaline of racing that was my highest of the year.

vladav
12-09-08, 12:09 PM
If those weren't tests, then they're meaningless. A 7% variance in 5s power suggests that these were not all-out tests.

Also, I compare the peak and 5s from the same actual sprint.

Ah, cool. That makes sense.

1314/1387 = 0.947 This one was a prospective bike test but at -27 TSB

Now if only I can keep those numbers while raising FTP and dropping weight :o

kudude
12-09-08, 12:11 PM
Indeed, I took mine from a sprint at the end of a short crit I won last year. 1408 peak, 1323 5s average = ~94%.
I had basically zero fatigue, and with the added adrenaline of racing that was my highest of the year.

you had 1400 still in the tank at the end of a race?

dick