Classic & Vintage - anyone familiar with the older trek 1200's?

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




skywriter
01-25-09, 11:22 AM
I just picked up this Trek 1200 aluminum frame bike off CL for $25 bucks, couldnt pass it up. It seems to have nicer or at least more modern components than my other trek bikes and it has matrix 700 wheels. So I guess my question is, would I be better off swapping the components off it to either my older trek 720 or my newer trek 420, or just keep it and ride as it is. I havent ridden it yet, I need tubes, it needs a good cleaning and servicing and the handlebars cleaned and rewrapped....I am not crazy about the pink, but im not going to repaint the frame over it.


ohjonnybegoode
01-25-09, 11:26 AM
I saw that ad last week on the Delaware CL and emailed the seller, but he never got back to me....glad you were able to snag it...sweet score!

SoreFeet
01-25-09, 11:28 AM
Those stock rims were the weakest link. I never found them to be reliable. They don't take the road too kindly. Its a great deal at 25$.


skywriter
01-25-09, 11:34 AM
i emailed him last week , he said he had a few in front of me that didn't follow through. are the frames decent? it seems beefier than my early steel trek frames.

roccobike
01-25-09, 11:42 AM
For $25, if it's a TREK adult bike I would buy it and figure out whats wrong with it later. Those early aluminum road bikes evaporate in minutes at yard sales for twice that price. The last 1200 I saw on CL around here went for $150.

skywriter
01-25-09, 12:04 PM
I picked it up this morning....those pics were in front of my house..I had to drive 100 round trip miles to pick it up, but it was too good of a deal to pass up. now I look at it though the frame is a bit small for me..it was owned by a female rider..I may end up stripping the frame and using the components on something else if my wife decides it won't work for her

divineAndbright
01-25-09, 12:12 PM
The 105 parts are ok, wether you like the bio pace rings on the crank is up to you. Couldnt go wrong for $25 bucks even if it doesnt fit you. The matrix wheel set is good IMO - nice and light, but you gotta take care of them... no sprinting into a chunk of shrapnal metal on the street like I happened to do once.. ended up with a flat spot in the rims I couldnt straighten out with any amount of truing and a couple of flat tires.

RFC
01-25-09, 12:44 PM
My son has that exact model as his campus bike. I'm guessing 1989-91. The frame is very solid. Regarding the Matrix rims, I have those same rims on three bikes and have put thousands and thousands of miles on them with no problem.

skywriter
01-26-09, 10:41 AM
new tubes rewrapped the tape on the bars, used a bottle of black car touch up paint on the chips and scratches and put 2 coats of car wax on her. lots of elbow grease and new tubes, and she looks 100% better. Its light and fast too, but it rides hard as a rock. guess im used to my 420 trek.still a great deal for a less than 50 dollar investment.Hope the wife likes it as much as I do.

Fibber
03-29-09, 09:07 PM
I picked up a 1989 Trek 1000 last week for $20. Rear rim is pretty bent up, so conventional truing isn't going to do it. Seems like a nice bike overall.

mkeller234
03-29-09, 10:27 PM
Thats an awesome bike for 25.00. I have a 1420 almost exactly like yours, its nice and light and rides pretty stiff. I personally love the 105 with the hyperglide freewheel, it shifts extremely well.

Mine has a Cro-moly fork which seems to make the ride a bit smoother, it still is a bit harsh though compared to my steel frames. Great bike, and I like the black/pink combo!

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3449/3377753978_1748c65dae_o.jpg

red sox junkie
03-30-09, 11:17 AM
I had a '93 (I think) that was very similar to yours. The rims were crap, but otherwise a nice bike. At $25 it was a steal! The only downside is that you are kind of stuck with 7 speed (I'm guessing) because you can't spread an aluminum rear triangle.

thenomad
03-30-09, 11:24 AM
I've got nearly the same bike, with 105 hyperglide components. 7 speed gears, no biopace.
1990 model. Solid, light and does the job nicely. I'm considering a CF fork for kicks and to smooth out the ride but since I've always ridden it i don't consider it harsh.

Amazing find for $25, I'd buy it in a heartbeat to have spare wheels etc. Stuff gets snatched up really quick with prices under $100. Just replacing the quill stem would cost you more than $25!




And hey, where's everyone buying their replacement Aero brake hoods? I need some in white and in black.

JeremiahW037
03-31-09, 05:03 PM
That depends on how big you're going. I converted my '91 Trek 1200 to 8 sp Dura-Ace. Went from a 126mm rear to 130mm just fine. Super solid, but I wouldn't want to go any wider than that as cold setting Aluminum isn't really as safe as Steel.


I had a '93 (I think) that was very similar to yours. The rims were crap, but otherwise a nice bike. At $25 it was a steal! The only downside is that you are kind of stuck with 7 speed (I'm guessing) because you can't spread an aluminum rear triangle.

luker
03-31-09, 06:46 PM
I have a trek 2000 converted to Ultegra 9 speed and it works great. Don't cold set...I have never cold set the rear triangle, just worked the wheel into the dropouts - when I remove the wheel it springs back to spec. Kind of a pain to fix a tire when it is cold out, though.

The matrix aero rims were a little soft, and spokes would eventually pull through. I have a couple of sets of those that died that way. The other matrix rim death I have seen was brake surface failure, although those were exceptionally high-mileage wheels.

Ex Pres
03-31-09, 06:51 PM
Have an '88 2000 frame here. Currently running 130OLD DA paired spoke wheels w/8s cassette :eek:

krems81
03-31-09, 10:05 PM
The only downside is that you are kind of stuck with 7 speed (I'm guessing) because you can't spread an aluminum rear triangle.

I though those old cassette hubs were 130mm old.

krems81
03-31-09, 10:09 PM
Couldn't you also take a 2mm washer out of the non-drive side of a newer cassette hub and dish the wheel just a bit more, making it 128, and you're only spreading 2mm from 126 when installing the wheel?

RobbieTunes
04-01-09, 06:45 AM
That 1200 was a sweet frame, and Trek backed it up with great warranty service in every case I know of.

mkeller234
04-01-09, 06:55 AM
I have said it a few times in other threads, but I may as well say it again:

Trek has been amazing with customer service, I wrecked in my Trek Vapor helmet and got a free replacement. My 1990 Trek was missing the headbadge and Trek shipped a new one to me for free. They never asked how, who or why.... they have been amazing!

JeremiahW037
04-01-09, 08:25 AM
+1 to that. I bought a sweet fluorescent yellow 1200 from 91 and am getting ready to strip it and get it powder coated black. some manufacturers actually make some cheaper aluminum frames in in-between sizes like 132.5 so you can put either a 130 or 135 hub in it...its perfectly safe as long as you don't stretch the frame. I figured it was a great aluminum frame to build up.


That 1200 was a sweet frame, and Trek backed it up with great warranty service in every case I know of.