Foo - $15?? Shouldn't these be free?!

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




View Full Version : $15?? Shouldn't these be free?!


robertsdvd
04-27-04, 02:37 PM
http://www.nashbar.com/profile.cfm?sku=11476


Ebbtide
04-27-04, 02:47 PM
Yep, I never understood that. Water bottles should be free too.

robertsdvd
04-27-04, 02:49 PM
Yeah, most shops around here, if you do any decent amount of business with them, will give you a free bottle. I don't think I've ever paid for a water bottle.. oh wait once - I ordered a couple from Specialized as they were dirt cheap and I was ordering other stuff at the time.


MERTON
04-27-04, 02:51 PM
http://www.nashbar.com/profile.cfm?sku=11476
um.. $15 for a water bottle that looks like a boney babe in a t-shirt? :D

robertsdvd
04-27-04, 02:53 PM
Question mark

MERTON
04-27-04, 03:13 PM
Question mark

question mark?

Rev.Chuck
04-27-04, 03:16 PM
I would have to be paid sizeable sums to wear a Nashbar shirt in pubilic.

randya
04-27-04, 03:39 PM
The great American ruse: getting you to pay for their advertising.

Shouldn't all tee shirts with advertising on them be free??

Maybe they should be paying you to wear their shirt??

:(

trekkie820
04-27-04, 03:56 PM
Nashbar: T-shirts, $15...Clipless pedals, $20

Doctor Who
04-28-04, 06:16 AM
That's a terrible t-shirt design.

DEK
04-28-04, 01:27 PM
Why should they be?

Should your bike be free because there's a manufacturer's name on it? How about your jersery with a brand logo? Or your car with the dealer's sticker and manufactururer's name?

This seems to be no different to me or am I missing something. It's been known to happen. :o

Allister
04-28-04, 07:19 PM
There's a difference between branding and advertising. Branding merely shows who made the product. I suppose if the brand logo becomes too prominent (as sportswear companies are fond of doing) it could be classified as advertising, particularly in the case of clothing. My Ground Effect jersey has a small nondescript logo on the chest that I have no real problem with. If it was twelve inches big emblazoned of the back, or if it was some other company's logo, I'd look elsewhere.

Having said that, I do have a t-shirt with a large LUGNET logo on it which could be regarded as advertising. I wear it because a)it's obsure enough to be unrecognisable to the vast majority of people, and b)it's a non-profit organisation. I guess the cycling equivalent is it's like wearing a club jersey.

Fugazi Dave
04-28-04, 09:32 PM
If they're going to make a sad attempt at a college athletics t-shirt ripoff, you'd think they'd put a little more effort into the design aspect.