Utility Cycling - Surly BD First Test Ride Report

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




View Full Version : Surly BD First Test Ride Report


NormanF
02-25-09, 07:11 PM
Is the Surly Big Dummy supposed to be 45 lbs? My test ride impression was this felt like a very light bike that rode fast and rolled very smoothly. I had trouble believing this was a cargo bike! I forgot the Xtracycle was there!


cliffbatson
02-27-09, 09:50 AM
I love mine. If I could only have one bike, it would be a Big Dummy!

(But I'm glad I can have more than one bike...)

NormanF
02-27-09, 11:41 AM
To be honest, I rode it at the LBS unloaded. But it should feel a lot heavier with all the rear weight. Its a well-designed bike!


AsanaCycles
02-27-09, 10:15 PM
for some reason, I'm thinking in the Dirt Rag issue that had first impressions of The Dummy, their build stated 38lbs.

its a great bike. i love mine too.

it has very wide range of potential use.

i rode with a buddy up in Arcata, Ca. and his Dummy had a fairly lightweight XC wheelset, DT Hubs to MAVIC rims, and running something like a 1.5" lightweight touring slick.

depending on how you build it up, it has a wide range of "characteristic" to it.

i.e. on mine, I'm using a WTB DH wheelset, and a set of WTB Vulpine 2.1's.

i have a tendency to load it up every so often, and in the last 3 or 4 years, using an Xtracycle before, I'm now on my 3rd set of wheels for the Long Tail Cargo Bike.

i've been on mine for about a year now. its great.

here's a big long dribble (http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=391518) if you're into reading a ton about The Dummy...

peace...d

NormanF
02-27-09, 10:28 PM
Agreed. That's why its called the SUB of the bike world. If I wanted to carry more than just groceries, I would need at a minimum 2 wide loaders and 1 long loader, correct? Plus a pair of footsies for ferrying a passenger.

AsanaCycles
02-28-09, 11:18 PM
Agreed. That's why its called the SUB of the bike world. If I wanted to carry more than just groceries, I would need at a minimum 2 wide loaders and 1 long loader, correct? Plus a pair of footsies for ferrying a passenger.

I have 1 Long Loader. The number of times that its been essential to have, i'd say has been minimal. I dont have the occasion to haul things like ladders, etc... that often.

you'd be surprised how much you can haul without Wide Loaders. The Free Loaders handle quite a bit.

a portion of the Big Dummy frame has built in "footrests"

when i got the BD, i sold off the FreeRadical, and Footsies.

NormanF
03-01-09, 01:46 PM
I probably don't need the footsies and I suspect I would use the WLs sparingly. Very few of us need to haul very long objects - as in what the LL allows. Big bulky boxes are more common - like boxed goods. I suspect the FLs can swallow up all but the biggest and most of those can be strapped on the snap deck before a resort to the WLs is necessary.

unterhausen
03-03-09, 11:55 AM
I used to ride my tandem alone all the time. Riding a high quality but heavy bike is no big deal.