Bicycle Mechanics - shimano or SRAM chain

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




View Full Version : shimano or SRAM chain


bakhurts
03-20-09, 06:49 PM
Any significant differences for a person riding a road bike? I know the sram has a easy off link. the bike is a 9 speed ultegra/105.

thanks


DOS
03-20-09, 08:04 PM
Powerlink is the main difference and reason enough to choose SRAM.

kycycler
03-20-09, 09:29 PM
+1 on DOS.


pwdeegan
03-20-09, 10:02 PM
masterlinks are easier to work with for both installing and removing, but i really like shimano chains and the pin for reliability---it more closely acts like an original rivet, and in my own applications significantly reduces instances of chain suck and other chain problems. to be sure, the pins are more of a hassle than the masterlinks, but i don't really have need to take my chain on and off very often (and if it requires a serious cleaning, i just pony up the pocket change for a new pin).

lakay
03-20-09, 10:21 PM
Try Wipperman, their connex link is easier to assemble and reusable.

JiveTurkey
03-20-09, 11:02 PM
I'm using a 10-speed Shimano chain and Wipperman Connex link on the road bike and a similar 9-speed setup on the MTB. My shop friend convinced me everything would work best using a Shimano chain with an otherwise full Shimano drivetrain, but I can't stand the replacement pin system.

2_i
03-21-09, 12:27 AM
Try Wipperman, their connex link is easier to assemble and reusable.

As a word of caution, the masterlinks deteriorate at least as quickly as any other links within a chain. By using them beyond the life of the original chain, you can speed up the deterioration of the chain within which you reuse them, and of the drivetrain.

Ziemas
03-21-09, 12:57 AM
Try Wipperman, their connex link is easier to assemble and reusable.

The SRAM 9 speed is reusable too. As for easier to assemble, the Connex chain makes a really annoying noise if you assemble the link upside down. SRAM doesn't have this problem.

sharkey00
03-21-09, 01:20 AM
I used to use Shimano now I use SRAM. The main reason for switching is I was having problems getting the Shimano pins in and out without bending the links. So I switched to SRAM and have not had any regrets. I like being able to take my chain off and they have been easy to work with.

In the end I think the Shimano might make for a stronger chain (if installed flawlessly) but SRAM is much more convenient. Also, SRAM makes it possible to use my new favorite lube.

JiveTurkey
03-21-09, 08:53 AM
As a word of caution, the masterlinks deteriorate at least as quickly as any other links within a chain. By using them beyond the life of the original chain, you can speed up the deterioration of the chain within which you reuse them, and of the drivetrain.

This sounds like a good thing. Better to have all the links wear at the same rate. If the Connex did not wear, it could skip around.


The SRAM 9 speed is reusable too. As for easier to assemble, the Connex chain makes a really annoying noise if you assemble the link upside down. SRAM doesn't have this problem.

Easy solution: Install it right-side-up. The Connex is shaped like a kidney bean. You know you have it installed correctly when the Connex's curvature matches the curvature of the chainrings and cogs.