"The 33"-Road Bike Racing - How should base training *feel*?

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
davids0507
05-08-09, 01:19 PM
Sorry if this is in the wrong subforum, but I'm interested in hearing responses from successful racers, and this is training with the intention of eventually racing at a high level, so I thought it might belong.
A friend and I were discussing what base training should be like for pros, and how that can translate to those of us who can't ride 6 hours a day. I'm completely new to cycling, but I've been a distance runner for a long time, where I could basically do the same volume as a lower-mileage pro. My friend was saying something like how he doesn't believe in base training, because he doesn't understand how so much easy riding could possibly be beneficial. But in my experience from running, at least, the period when you do your base training is one of the most miserable times of the year. The mileage alone makes you tired all the time, on top of whatever workouts you try to do, and you're doing so much that you're generally cranky and irritable (and that's assuming you aren't overtraining). When I was running high mileage, it wasn't like I had to hold back to run slowly -- I just didn't have the exuberance/stupidity to go much faster unless it was for a workout.
So when people talk about base training for cycling, should it feel kind of miserable, or is it really meant to be an easy period of training? And if it's supposed to feel kind of miserable but you don't have the time to ride 6 hours a day, how do people alter their training to take that into account?
Thanks!
bdcheung
05-08-09, 01:21 PM
If you can't put in 20 hours a week, then forget about base training. You're better off doing SST.
My teammates who ride in excess of 27 hours of week don't ever say they feel tired, they just feel bored.
substructure
05-08-09, 01:21 PM
http://www.biketechreview.com/performance/base.htm
*new*guy
05-08-09, 02:11 PM
If you can't put in 20 hours a week, then forget about base training. You're better off doing SST.
My teammates who ride in excess of 27 hours of week don't ever say they feel tired, they just feel bored.
who on evo is riding that much? seriously.
bdcheung
05-08-09, 02:13 PM
who on evo is riding that much? seriously.
A couple of our Cat 1/2/3 masters put in something like a 27 or 28 hour week over winter base.
Nobody is riding that much now, I don't think.
*new*guy
05-08-09, 03:02 PM
right on. still, that's a huge commitment. 15 hours a week outside of racing is about all I can manage and that's all commuting.
cedricbosch
05-08-09, 03:04 PM
If you can't put in 20 hours a week, then forget about base training.
Wrong on so many levels.
davids0507
05-08-09, 03:26 PM
cedricbosch, can you elaborate?
http://www.biketechreview.com/performance/base.htm
Why waste your time and incur these significant costs? Even professional riders do not have time to waste. Time is better spent riding harder, recovering sooner, and avoiding unnecessary fatigue when building your base. There is a proper application for those longer, easier rides which shift adaptations towards glycogen storage in lower powered muscle fiber profiles, but they are not the base of cycling performance. 20MP is this base.
Interesting. My coach has not, until this point, sent me out on epic length rides. All of a sudden he is. Maybe he subscribes to this.
procrit
05-08-09, 04:08 PM
A couple of our Cat 1/2/3 masters put in something like a 27 or 28 hour week over winter base.
Nobody is riding that much now, I don't think.
Them sho ams a lotta hours.
procrit
05-08-09, 04:31 PM
http://www.andrewlove.org/_sitepagessupporting/FastcatCyclingIntervals.doc
Riding in zone 3 does everything better and more efficiently than zone 2 in every aspect. If I were trying to get 'base' miles in on a time budget, I'd stick in zone 3 with a little zone 4. If I had a very small time budget, I'd mix it up between zone 3 & 4 equally.
Zone 5-7 are probably as necessary in the off season as they are in the racing season. Maybe you do them very infrequently for maintenance purposes, but still do them. I've seen pro's doing vo2 intervals and weight training (weight training being equal to zone 6-7) in the winter, why shouldn't we?
whtmtnpeddla
05-08-09, 10:33 PM
If you can't put in 20 hours a week, then forget about base training. You're better off doing SST.
My teammates who ride in excess of 27 hours of week don't ever say they feel tired, they just feel bored.
WRONG!....also any cat 3 riding more than 20 hours a week is wasting their time.....that kind of volume is not needed at that level.
chrisvu05
05-08-09, 10:50 PM
WRONG!....also any cat 3 riding more than 20 hours a week is wasting their time.....that kind of volume is not needed at that level.
when is that kind of volume needed?
enjoi07
05-08-09, 11:21 PM
when is that kind of volume needed?
when you get paid to do it
cedricbosch
05-08-09, 11:52 PM
cedricbosch, can you elaborate?
Sure, low to mid intensity base training is probably the most important aspect of the training season. The notion that it must also be high-volume is somewhat misleading. It is pretty much a diminishing returns curve, as with most other things in cycling. Base training is helpful, no matter how much time you can dedicate to it.
For more reading, read the Training Bible or Base Training for Cyclists.
WRONG!....also any cat 3 riding more than 20 hours a week is wasting their time.....that kind of volume is not needed at that level.
Why not? If a guy wants to be a cat2 or beyond, he needs to find another level.
Logging more hours is one proven avenue.
NomadVW
05-09-09, 04:24 AM
I'm always tired in base training. My hours per week don't really change from base to build (15-17). What changes is the recovery from intensity. In base I tend to be at a constant level of "semi-fatigue" - that tired that says "man I'm kinda tired" but not so much that I don't want to be on the bike putting in miles. I can't keep that fatigue level when I add intensity, so that L2 day on Wednesdays becomes a 2 hour recovery spin - that way Tuesday and Thursday can be effective workouts.
That being said, I do SST as part of my base as well.. usually two days per week.
fordfasterr
05-11-09, 05:48 PM
this is the best thread evar. =)
ZeCanon
05-11-09, 06:21 PM
WRONG!....also any cat 3 riding more than 20 hours a week is wasting their time.....that kind of volume is not needed at that level.
I agree with YMCA here... train like you're in the category you want to be in, not the one you are in. If you train like a cat 4 forever, guess what you're going to stay a cat 4 forever. Train like a cat 2 does and maybe you'll get there.
I've posted my thoughts on oldskool base vs. SST type base training a number of times on these forums, but I'll put them up again. Essentially, I believe that old school type base work (high volume, low[er] intensity) definitely has its benefits, and if your schedule permits you should seriously consider doing a lot of high volume work early in the season. The highly simplified rational behind this is that if you only ever ride for 2.5 hrs, 2.5 hrs is always going to feel hard. If you ride for 5 hrs on a pretty regular basis, 2.5 seems really friggin easy. There is a much more complex rational, but it essentially states the same thing and I don't feel like typing it all out.
That said, oldskool base is not the only kind of base. It just happens to be the one that works best, in my experience. For someone with limited time using that time efficiently is key. That's where SST-type workouts come in. Essentially, they maximize the fatigue/recovery cycles that make you stronger. If you can only ever ride for 2 hours, and you spend all winter doing those 2 hour rides at low intensity, you are going to come into the season as slow as snot. Take that same intensity but make the ride 5 hrs long and you are getting some benefit, but at 2 hrs you just are not breaking your body down enough for it to build up any stronger. So your 2 hour rides need to be at a higher intensity (SST-like) in order to see the kind of adaptation you are looking for.
NomadVW
05-11-09, 07:03 PM
^^^
Well said
wfrogge
05-12-09, 07:34 AM
Base training dosent mean you tool around for 20 hours a week. The pros are hitting it hard..... You are building your base not falling back to an easy level.
MrCrassic
05-12-09, 07:52 AM
If you can't put in 20 hours a week, then forget about base training. You're better off doing SST.
My teammates who ride in excess of 27 hours of week don't ever say they feel tired, they just feel bored.
Citation needed.
SST (Sweet spot training) is still good if your time is limited, but base training certainly doesn't require 20+ hours a week.
bdcheung
05-12-09, 08:01 AM
Friel says you should increase your weekly hours every week of base training.
So if you start at 6 hours a week, the next week you might do 9, then 12, then 15 (or whatever increase accompanies your chosen increment). I found that with my limited training time, skipping base and just doing SST was far more beneficial.
merlinextraligh
05-12-09, 08:14 AM
I'm completely new to cycling,
No one here has addressed your situation. There are lenghty debates in multiple threads about the value of long moderately paced miles, versus more intensity during the base phase, with each having their proponents.
However, those debates are in the context of people with years of cycling experience, and training 12 months a year, year after year.
The answer for people in that situation may not be that helpful to someone brand new to the sport.
Being brand new, you will benefit just riding miles, any kind of miles, as your body adapts to the specific movements of cycling.
To avoid injury, I would take a few weeks, and just ride. Mostly at a moderate pace. After a few days, you can push a bit harder for short periods as you feel like it, but don't really push too hard, or anything structured. And make sure you take at least one day a week and do not ride, or ride short at a very easy pace. After 2 weeks, work on doing some low resistence high cadence drills. You can also throw in some one legged drills after you have a few hundred miles in.
Being brand new, you'll benefit from developing some good form, and gradually working your way into things without injury.
When you've got a solid 500 miles in, start adding some actual interval work.
Then come October, read the threads debating LSD vs SST and decide what will work for you in next year's base phase, given your time, goals, and personality.
But for now, you should concentrate on actually building a base, in its most basic sense.
Duke of Kent
05-12-09, 12:41 PM
WRONG!....also any cat 3 riding more than 20 hours a week is wasting their time.....that kind of volume is not needed at that level.
Let me guess. You're 17 and a Cat 4?
bdcheung
05-12-09, 12:47 PM
Let me guess. You're 17 and a Cat 4?
I dunno, but my teammate who did the 27+ hour base week has more championship jerseys (from last season alone) than I do fingers.
To me, base means raising your CTL so you can do more focused intervals multiple days a week and still recover. What makes up that base is a completely different story.
spinwax
05-12-09, 01:14 PM
Funny, because guys like crit powerhouse Rahsaan Bahati says his normal week of training consist of about 15 hours. Definitely on the low end of a pro.
27 hours a week is more than Lance was putting in before the TOC. Lance stated that he was putting in about 24hours a week of training in during the early season with some higher numbers here and there.
Remember, usually many of those hours are just not on the bike (ie. cross training, stretching, etc are usually included in those hours given).
I ride a lot at about 16-20 hours a week. I do however have a wife, a full time job and of course tons of day to day obligations. Would I ride 27 hours a week if I could? LOL, probably!!!!:D I would be divorced though.:(
bdcheung
05-12-09, 01:20 PM
Funny
I wasn't clear in what I wrote. His base training peaked at a ~27 hour week.
artimus
05-12-09, 01:26 PM
No one here has addressed your situation. There are lenghty debates in threads about the value of long moderately paced miles, versus more intensity during the base phase, with each having their proponents.
However, those debates are in the context of people with years of experience, and training 12 months a year, year after year.
The answer for people in that situation may not be that helpful to someone to .
Being brand new, you will benefit just miles, miles, as your adapts to the specific movements of cycling.
To avoid injury, I would take a few weeks, and just ride. Mostly at a moderate . After a few days, you can push a bit harder for short periods as you feel like it, but don't really push too hard, or anything structured. And make sure you take at least one day a week and do not ride, or ride short at a very easy pace. After 2 weeks, work on doing some resistence high cadence drills. You can also throw in some one legged drills after you have a few hundred miles in.
Being brand new, you'll benefit from developing some good form, and gradually working your way into things without injury.
When you've got a solid 500 miles in, start adding some actual interval work.
Then come October, read the threads debating vs SST and decide what will work for you in next year's base phase, given your time, goals, and personality.
But for now, you should concentrate on actually building a base, in its most basic sense.
This is one of those gems that you can find on this site.
Thank you
Nobody answered the OP's question of how base training should feel.
Base training should feel cold, wet and lonely. You should feel like an idiot for choosing this ridiculous sport. No matter how long you have to ride, you should feel tired at the end your rides, but not so tired that you can't go out and do it 2 or 3 days in a row before you need a day off.
spinwax
05-12-09, 03:07 PM
Nobody answered the OP's question of how base training should feel.
Base training should feel cold, wet and lonely.
That is because you live in Oregon!! :p
wfrogge
05-12-09, 03:17 PM
Nobody answered the OP's question of how base training should feel.
Base training should feel cold, wet and lonely. You should feel like an idiot for choosing this ridiculous sport. No matter how long you have to ride, you should feel tired at the end your rides, but not so tired that you can't go out and do it 2 or 3 days in a row before you need a day off.
And you should always feel that you are too fat for this sport and your bike is in need of expensive upgrades before you can hit the next level.
mollusk
05-12-09, 03:24 PM
Nobody answered the OP's question of how base training should feel.
Base training should feel like you want to take a nap when you get home, but you are ready to do it again the next day. After a week you should feel very bored. That is the day that you ramp it up a bit and then have a rest/recovery day. Repeat this for as long as you can stand it or until it is time to "build" for something important.
roy5000x2
05-12-09, 03:38 PM
So wait, should I be a pro because I've spent an entire summer doing 27+ hour base weeks?
chrisvu05
05-12-09, 03:59 PM
So wait, should I be a pro because I've spent an entire summer doing 27+ hour base weeks?
at the very least you should be in great shape...or extremely overtrained
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.