Mountain Biking - What size Monocog 29er?
Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
05-23-09, 11:35 AM
Just as the title suggests...I'm 5'10" and have longer legs, shorter arms. Short & stocky, guess you could say. I'm not worried about standover, think I'll be fine either way, but would the reach be better on a 17" or a 19"?
Many folks I know say go smaller if in-between on a 29er, to compensate for the slower steering and generally bigger bike.
What do you guys think?
05-25-09, 07:37 PM
I'm the same height, like 5'10.5", i ride the 17" but i also felt like maybe I'm in-between sizes. I have a lot of post showing, but i suspect the standover'd've been too high with the 19". The toptube difference isn't very big, if i recall (redline has full specs/geo on their website), and you can always mess around with stems. I have a 17" with like a 90mm stem, b/c i don't like to be too stretched on the bike.
The best thing you could do is find locals who rock the monocog and borrow theirs, to see what fits. I have a freind with a flight in 17", and while the geo is different, both frames fit me quite similarly. If you can't run that, i'd sday get the 17", try it out, and get a 19" frame to swap the parts too if the 17" doesn't work out.
I ride a Mono 9 and I am 5'10" and have the 17". The 19" would have caused some injury with the standover height.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.