Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
01-21-00, 11:23 AM
Any suggestion? They're about the same price...which is the better buy?
This is a very opinionated subject. Sort of like asking which is better, Fords, GM or Chrysler. Ask 5 people, you'll likely get 5 different answers.
I had a Cannondale R900 that I rode a few thousand miles per year on for about 4 years. There were a lot of things to like about it. I fit me great, handled superbly and looked terrific. Natch, it was light weight & cost less than other permium mounts. There were 2 things I didn't like about it. It was too stiff (yes, there is such a thing.) On anything but perfect pavement, it beat the hell out of me. I put a Carbon Fiber fork on it, padded the bars heavily, but it wasn't good enough. The other thing I didn't like was that it felt "dead." When slowing for a traffic light to maybe between 5-10 mph, then getting out of the saddle to sprint back up to speed, felt like it took an inordinate amount of effort. Any ride with lots of decceleration & acceleration, really wore me out.
The'Dale was the first & only non-steel bike I've owned. I eventually bought a DeRosa Nuovo Classico, & I didn't touch the 'Dale again for a full year & ended up selling it.
Sorry I can''t comment about the Raleigh--I know nothing about it. Hope this helps.