Foo - Foo Proposition #23.4.7.12 subparagraph c

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




KingTermite
07-13-09, 10:04 AM
For some time, my friends and members of the Foo congress, we have enjoyed the "rule of thumb" for sex and/or poo by post #10. However, there have been times the "rule of thumb" was not conformed to. That is understandable because it is not Foo law, only a "rule of thumb".

In order to form a more perfect union and four score and 7 poos ago, our Foo forefathers, blah blah blah. Therefore I propose this as Foo LAW.

Proposition #23.4.7.12 subparagraph c.
All posts in the Bikeforums subforum designated as Foo, hereafter referred to as Foo, shall be tainted by reference to sex or poo on or before the 9th reply to said initial post. Punishment shall be meated (pastrami preferably) to the 9th replier if post does not comply and none before have insofar complied. The punishment will be at the discretion of the Foo president.

That is the proposition. If motion carries by 51% or higher vote of the Foo congress then it can be signed in to law by the Foo president (CBadRider at the time of this writing). If CBadRider vetoes this vote, we shall have to have another vote and will only override her veto if we have a 2/3 majority.


ModoVincere
07-13-09, 10:06 AM
already been doing this....do we really need a law passed to make it official?

KingTermite
07-13-09, 10:08 AM
already been doing this....do we really need a law passed to make it official?

Yes. It's only a "rule of thumb" now....and to stave those 2% of cases where it does not happen, we need a law to enforce it.


Tude
07-13-09, 10:08 AM
And who shall be in charge of ensuring this Foo proposition by policing all new threads, if it is passed of course?

UnsafeAlpine
07-13-09, 10:11 AM
I poo poo this idea.

KingTermite
07-13-09, 10:12 AM
I poo poo this idea.

Thank you for that. It warms my heart.
Must be a Cleavland Steamer.

Wordbiker
07-13-09, 10:12 AM
Make it a law so the lawyers will screw us? I don't think so.

KingTermite
07-13-09, 10:13 AM
And who shall be in charge of ensuring this Foo proposition by policing all new threads, if it is passed of course?

The president, of course as she is the one who meats out the punishment.

jsharr
07-13-09, 10:16 AM
KT's Theorem Number 69 - 2
F + Poo = Foo?

pgoat
07-13-09, 10:16 AM
I screw this idea.

sexed it up 4 u

jsharr
07-13-09, 10:17 AM
I number two the motion.

KingTermite
07-13-09, 10:17 AM
KT's Theorem Number 69 - 2
F + Poo = Foo?

The proof is in the pudding!
Did you eat any?

pgoat
07-13-09, 10:17 AM
I number two the motion.

:lol: genius

pgoat
07-13-09, 10:18 AM
The proof is in the pudding!
Did you eat any?

eeee-yew:twitchy:

ModoVincere
07-13-09, 10:20 AM
The proof is in the pudding!
Did you eat any?

Son, that aint pudding. Do you need a cup or two?

UnsafeAlpine
07-13-09, 10:24 AM
Son, that aint pudding. Do you need a cup or two?

Two Foosters, one cup?

ModoVincere
07-13-09, 10:24 AM
Two Foosters, one cup? ;)

jsharr
07-13-09, 10:28 AM
Pgoatse?!

pgoat
07-13-09, 10:34 AM
Pgoatse?!

u should see my puddin':eek:

trsidn
07-13-09, 10:43 AM
grooosssssssssssssss!

jsharr
07-13-09, 10:43 AM
u should see my puddin':eek:

Your current avatar and that quote together are a bit unsettling, as it has a my interal dialogue reading the quote with an English accent.

ehidle
07-13-09, 10:43 AM
:lol: genius

yes, quite...

ehidle
07-13-09, 10:44 AM
Two Foosters, one cup?


Pgoatse?!

GAHHHHHHH!!!!!!! @#$(&%(#$&^%(@*#&$(&*^@$%)@#)$(*@#()$*&@&#$@(#$@

*GOUGES EYES OUT....

There are some things that, despite best efforts, cannot be unseen...

jsharr
07-13-09, 10:50 AM
the poll really needs a "wait, what?" vote option and and an "all of the above" option

pgoat
07-13-09, 10:53 AM
not to mention a roll of TP




























and three hard boiled eggs *honk*

RUOkie
07-13-09, 10:55 AM
No more government intervention!!!

wait, this isn't P&R---slinks away quietly...

Tude
07-13-09, 11:24 AM
http://www.fotosearch.com/bthumb/DGV/DGV085/200390363-001.jpg

klondike300
07-13-09, 01:09 PM
I voted no only becuase rules turn to laws and laws get broken then we're back to square one.
Freedom to the peeps!:)

pgoat
07-13-09, 01:16 PM
I voted no because of my predilection to contrariness


http://i263.photobucket.com/albums/ii132/pgoat/Flops/200390363-001.jpghttp://i263.photobucket.com/albums/ii132/pgoat/Flops/Copyof200390363-001.jpg

KingTermite
07-13-09, 01:37 PM
No love for the Foo props, eh?

UnsafeAlpine
07-13-09, 01:42 PM
No love for the Foo poops, eh?

fiffoo

KingTermite
07-14-09, 09:27 AM
Come on Foosters.....a whole week to vote on this historic election.

You know it should be a law...deep in your heart you KNOW it! :thumb:

DogsBody
07-14-09, 10:34 AM
Come on Foosters.....a whole week to vote on this historic election.

You know it should be a law...deep in your heart you KNOW it! :thumb:
Haven't been a Citizen (Denizen?) for long enough methinks.
Though I did use the toilet down in the furnace room.
Burned my friggin' ass, and the basement smelled like burnt poo-toast.

Eboo
07-14-09, 10:40 AM
I vote nay solely upon the fact that any foo that is governed by a set or series of rules and/or regulations is no foo I wish to be a part of.

I shat be a phart of it.

USAZorro
07-14-09, 10:50 AM
Call me old fashioned, but I try to keep sex and poo completely separate. I also greatly prefer the former to the latter, so unless there's an amendment to remove the poo, I' going to vote nay.

pgoat
07-14-09, 11:35 AM
I shat be a phart of it.

moar genius; this thread flushes it out

ModoVincere
07-14-09, 11:38 AM
I vote nay solely upon the fact that any foo that is governed by a set or series of rules and/or regulations is no foo I wish to be a part of.

I shat be a phart of it.

Eboo!!!!!!!

This place has been in the crapper without you! Welcome back!

KingTermite
07-14-09, 11:40 AM
I vote nay solely upon the fact that any foo that is governed by a set or series of rules and/or regulations is no foo I wish to be a part of.Since when have you been a part of it? Leave us in the dust like annoying family, you do!

CbadRider
07-14-09, 10:33 PM
And who shall be in charge of ensuring this Foo proposition by policing all new threads, if it is passed of course?


The president, of course as she is the one who meats out the punishment.

Hence the blue star.

Meats out the punishment? I think corn would work better.

KiddSisko
07-15-09, 01:42 AM
KT's Theorem Number 69 - 2
F + Poo = Foo?

That's flat out brilliant. And I don't say that just because you're quoting me.

DogsBody
07-15-09, 09:52 AM
This thread has no moral fibre.
http://i266.photobucket.com/albums/ii261/funkbutter/graphics/Funny/9_funny_britney_spears_poop.jpg?t=1247673090
See?

KingTermite
07-15-09, 09:54 AM
I think you all hate the idea because you hate me. Is it the poo smell?

DogsBody
07-16-09, 09:10 AM
http://www.musicbanter.com/attachments/lounge/2550d1190624227-cat-thread-aka-caturday-cats-042.jpg

pgoat
07-16-09, 09:14 AM
I think you all hate the idea because you hate me. Is it the poo smell?

i'm still mad cause you hatin' on hickeyhat

DannoXYZ
07-16-09, 02:36 PM
You haven't seen a real poo discussion until you've read this thread: Corner-carvers: Poo Tech (http://www.corner-carvers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=285).

For those into performance pooing:

http://bedzine.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/carbonfiber_llcwb_12.jpg
http://bedzine.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/carbonfiber_llcwb_12.jpg