General Cycling Discussion - question for curiousity sake

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




View Full Version : question for curiousity sake


mr geeker
08-28-09, 12:23 AM
ok, i baught what i was lead to believe was an 04 trek, but the catch is, that the only year that has a similar paint scheeme is the 95. did i get bamboozled or was the seller merely mistaken?


kidonabike
08-28-09, 01:23 AM
pictures?

chomish
08-28-09, 02:57 AM
ok, i baught what i was lead to believe was an 04 trek, but the catch is, that the only year that has a similar paint scheeme is the 95. did i get bamboozled or was the seller merely mistaken?

Lol.

While the seller was trying to get you to buy the bike, did he seem like he was trying to hold back laughter?
Was he laughing as u left with the bike?
Did u hear him mumble "i think i got him now" while showing u this bike?

If you said yes to any of these, than u got bamboozled. Who cares its happened to all of us.


stapfam
08-28-09, 03:08 AM
Trek 830's have been around for years and the bikes have not changed much in that time. The bike frame is indestructable- so whether you bought an 04 or a 95 does not make a great deal of difference. Only thing to worry about is whether you got a deal on the price that was good irrespective of year- or not.

RonH
08-28-09, 05:30 AM
BikePedia only lists the Trek 830 through 1999. So, I guess there was no 2004 model. :rolleyes:

Velo Dog
08-28-09, 08:35 AM
Trek 830's have been around for years and the bikes have not changed much in that time. The bike frame is indestructable- so whether you bought an 04 or a 95 does not make a great deal of difference. Only thing to worry about is whether you got a deal on the price that was good irrespective of year- or not.

Same thing I was going to say. You may not have the model you thought, but if you like the bike, it doesn't matter. I have an Atlantis and a Rambouillet (about $3000 each if I had to replace them now; I didn't pay nearly that), but when I just want to ride a bike, I'm as likely to hop on an old Trek I've had for 15 years. Just go ride.

mr geeker
08-28-09, 09:22 AM
here is the pic (http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?p=9009137#post9009137) you asked for. and yea, i like the bike just fine, regardless of which model year it is.

GamecockTaco
08-28-09, 09:48 AM
pretty sure you've got an older model there. First clue is no suspension fork.

That looks a LOT like my 97 version.

GamecockTaco
08-28-09, 09:49 AM
sorry duplicate post.

Svr
08-29-09, 10:11 PM
It's a 1995 for sure. Center pull cantilever brakes have been gone since 1997. There was no 830 in 1998, and the 1999 model had an aluminum frame.

norwood
08-29-09, 10:18 PM
A '95 will be a steel frame. An '04 will be an aluminum frame.(I think)
You have a 1995.

Bikewer
08-30-09, 08:52 AM
Look at the codes stamped into the components. (Derailleurs) Then go to this site:

http://www.vintage-trek.com/component_dates.htm

It's always possible that a DR manufactured in say, 96 might be on a '97 bike, but usually it's pretty close.