Tandem Cycling - Assessing Team Improvement

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




View Full Version : Assessing Team Improvement


rdtompki
11-15-09, 07:13 PM
Absent actual power measurement I'm finding climbing speed to be a reasonable means of assessing our improvement. The Garmin 705 may not measure grade accurately, but I find it to be very repeatable so two grades that read out as 6% (+-0.5%) are probably pretty close. A 6% grade used to find us in our small chainring (24t), but we can manage pretty comfortably in our 36t chainring with 30t cog. 7% finds us wishing we were in the 24t. Our cadence is usually in a small range, 85-90 or perhaps a bit higher. The real test will be the grade we can hold with our lowest gear, 24-30. 8% sustained is required for a fair number of the climbs around here.

Next week we're going to try Freemont Peak in San Juan Batista, stoker willing, which looks to have 6 miles at about 6% avg. and an additional 3 miles or so at about 8% avg. I know a good meal at the top would put the stoker in afterburner, but such is not the case. Wish us luck.


Chris_W
11-16-09, 03:38 PM
To compare speed on one climb versus another, it is handy to compute your rate of vertical ascent. If you're climbing an 8% gradient at 10 km/h, then you are climbing at 800 vertical metres per hour (= 8 * 10 * 10). If it's a 6% gradient at 12 km/h, then that is 720 vm/h (= 6 * 12 * 10). The rate that we can sustain for a prolonged climb is a fairly accurate measure of our strength (and can be used as a poor man's power meter) and is more reliable than our horizontal speed on the flat, which is more affected by other factors.

Two drawbacks: If you don't use metric then the calculations are impossible to do in your head. Steeper climbs (i.e., 7+ %) make it slightly easier to achieve higher rates of ascent than easier climbs (i.e., around 5%). Becuase of this, I only compute it when the gradient is at least 6%, and know not to expect it to be as high as possible unless we're in the sweet spot for the gradient, which is about 8-11% given our gearing (lowest gear = 24 front / 26 rear).

cornucopia72
11-16-09, 06:41 PM
Why not just go back to the same hill and plot your times over a prolonged period?