Advocacy & Safety - Article: Big jump in serious cycling crash injuries

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




JonnyHK
12-21-09, 06:35 AM
http://www.theage.com.au/national/big-jump-in-serious-cycling-crash-injuries-20091220-l7ml.html

Big jump in serious cycling crash injuries (http://www.theage.com.au/national/big-jump-in-serious-cycling-crash-injuries-20091220-l7ml.html)
CLAY LUCAS
December 21, 2009

THE number of cyclists being seriously injured or turning up badly hurt at Victoria's hospital emergency departments is surging, as bicycle sales boom and cycling is promoted as a commuting option.

In 1999, 1236 cyclists were hospitalised or treated for injuries at emergency departments, figures from Monash University's Victorian Injury Surveillance Unit show. By 2007 the figure had leapt to 2294, with more than 700 spending at least a night in hospital.

Doctors say the number of injuries to cyclists are probably vastly underreported as many of those hurt went to their general practitioner, who had no way of registering how the injury was sustained.

Last year 1.4 million bicycles were sold in Australia, and governments at all levels are promoting cycling as a healthy, environmentally friendly alternative to the car.

While injuries appear to be rising, just four cyclists have been killed in Victoria so far this year - down from a five-year average of nine.

Marilyn Johnson, a researcher at Monash University's Accident Research Centre, said people being killed while riding a bicycle seemed to be levelling out. ''That might be a reflection of better emergency procedures, or better cyclist-driver relations,'' she said.

The Victorian Injury Surveillance unit analysis, which includes only cyclists older than 15, looked at 14,668 hospital-treated cycling injury cases at Victorian hospitals between 1999 and 2007.

It found that while the number of injuries had increased steadily as the population rose, the number of injuries went up sharply from 2004.

The figures also show that men make up about 80 per cent of all recorded injuries.

Few know the dangers of cycling on Melbourne's roads better than Michael Forbes. An elite cyclist and triathlete who had ridden competitively for 20 years, he was training for the state road cycling championships when a truck hit him last June while hew was cycling on Beach Road in East Brighton.

''I was ricocheted into a parked 4WD, which is what broke my neck,'' he said. The truck driver did not stop, and has not been found.

Mr Forbes spent seven months in hospital, and is now a quadriplegic.

A successful IT consultant before the accident, much of Mr Forbes' time is now taken up recovering. ''I'm still doing 25 hours a week of rehab,'' he says.

The Amy Gillett Foundation, named after the late champion cyclist who died when hit by a car in 2005, last month launched A Metre Matters, a campaign urging drivers to give cyclists more space on the road.

But chief executive Tony Fox said it was important not to overstate the dangers to cyclists. ''The number of cyclists is increasing at a faster rate than the number being injured - injuries as a percentage of total riders are going down,'' he said.


closetbiker
12-21-09, 08:27 AM
An example of how media turns a story around in order to get attention.

I'm guessing media doesn't think a good news story gathers much interest, so they turn a decrease of injuries and death into an increase.

genec
12-21-09, 08:34 AM
An example of how media turns a story around in order to get attention.

I'm guessing media doesn't think a good news story gathers much interest, so they turn a decrease of injuries and death into an increase.

I'm missing something... everything they said had an "increase" in it... where was this "spun?"

In 1999, 1236 cyclists were hospitalised or treated for injuries at emergency departments, figures from Monash University's Victorian Injury Surveillance Unit show. By 2007 the figure had leapt to 2294, with more than 700 spending at least a night in hospital.


closetbiker
12-21-09, 08:51 AM
I'm missing something... everything they said had an "increase" in it... where was this "spun?"

In the last sentence


... ''The number of cyclists is increasing at a faster rate than the number being injured - injuries as a percentage of total riders are going down,'' .

of course, it's easy to miss that as the readers mind is all over the "increase" in "serious" injuries to people riding bikes, further spreading the "cycling is dangerous" myth. :(

closetbiker
12-21-09, 09:07 AM
Actually, I'm glad the writer included Foxs' comment.

Without it, it would have been much harder to spot the problem with the article.

You would have to have some intimate knowledge of the particular figures to point out the (intended?) misinformation.

Some "safety" campaigns hire experts to omit and present numbers in a manner to purposefully deceive people in order to gain support for their cause. Opposition to such campaigns therefore have to hire their own experts to show how the public has been manipulated to support the campaigns goals.

Before long, the public simply loses trust in any claims and are no better informed and less willing to learn how to improve things

genec
12-21-09, 12:16 PM
In the last sentence



of course, it's easy to miss that as the readers mind is all over the "increase" in "serious" injuries to people riding bikes, further spreading the "cycling is dangerous" myth. :(


Ah, I didn't notice that as I was indeed taken in by the earlier comment
It found that while the number of injuries had increased steadily as the population rose, the number of injuries went up sharply from 2004.

Thanks for pointing out the "spin."

jputnam
12-21-09, 01:04 PM
But chief executive Tony Fox said it was important not to overstate the dangers to cyclists. ''The number of cyclists is increasing at a faster rate than the number being injured - injuries as a percentage of total riders are going down,'' he said.

In other words, cycling has gotten safer as the population of cyclists increased, even though many of the new cyclists have not yet developed years of cycling experience.

The rate of injury per cyclist is lower, the rate of injuries per capita is higher because of the increase in cycling.

One missing data point -- how much of the increase in cycling displaced similar miles of motoring, and how many injuries might have been expected from that driving exposure. (After all, it's driving, not cycling, that kills as many Americans as 9/11 every single month. I expect rates are similar there.)