Folding Bikes - Mezzo D10 - any good?

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




View Full Version : Mezzo D10 - any good?


ningnangnong
01-24-10, 05:32 AM
Anyone ridden/got one? Only a few thin website/magazine reviews around.


PDR
01-24-10, 10:34 AM
Don’t know......
I’d never want to own anything that looks so darn ugly :rolleyes: Handle-bar stem looks like it was cobbled together by a drunken plumber.
:lol:

bent eagle
01-26-10, 12:17 AM
Don’t know......
I’d never want to own anything that looks so darn ugly :rolleyes: Handle-bar stem looks like it was cobbled together by a drunken plumber.
:lol:
LOL

Funny, to each his own, I guess. I kind of like the Mezzo look.


14R
01-26-10, 09:44 AM
The Mezzo seems to be a good fit for a lot of people. I personally like things designed, not engineered. The "drunken plumber" theory is quite funny: The mezzo wasn't for me anyway, but after you said that I cannot look at that stem without thinking there is something very wrong with it! LoL.

feijai
01-26-10, 10:38 AM
I think the Mezzo's stem design is quite clever. Rather than go up, then out, it simply goes out, then up. This enables a tight fold without nearly the compromises that Brompton needs to make.

I think design aesthetics are often bunk. Perhaps disagreement with the aesthetics of the stem might stem from spending one's life seeing stems go up, then out; or just up. If the world only had Mezzos, surely (say) a Brompton or Tikit would look ridiculous.

This is the same effect that recumbents have on people. Recumbents are in many respects superior bikes; certainly much faster, more comfortable, and safer with forward lookahead. But they look ridiculous because people are so used to seeing, for 100 years, a largely inferior design, and it's burned into our neurons as the "better designed bike".

brommie
01-26-10, 11:51 AM
Don't know about the D10, but the weak point of the Mezzo were the gears. I think AtoB wrote something like - this could be a Brompton killer if it wasn't for the gears - but this is not an exactly quote.
But if you really want to know if a bike fits you the best way is to test it . . .

feijai
01-26-10, 01:19 PM
Don't know about the D10, but the weak point of the Mezzo were the gears.


Old data at this point I think. Mezzos have (I believe) a 349x35 tire. The D9 is 54 x 11-26, which yields 33.4 to 78.9 gear inches. Basically similar to the stock Tikit. The D10 is 56 x 11-28, which yields 32.1 to 81.8. The D9 doesn't even have a Capreo any more, unlike what A2B thinks (http://www.atob.org.uk/buyers-guide.html#Mezzo). A2B really needs to broaden and update that buying guide. Highly British in perspective, and a bit dated.

bhkyte
07-01-10, 05:38 AM
The increased price of a D10 over a D9 or D4 does not represent good value IMO.

The noticable upgrades are;
1. The frame is around 1/2 pound lighter?
2. The chain wheel is 56t rather than 56, and therfore a bigger chain guard is used.
3. The rear brake is V brake rather than Calliper.
5. 10 speed rather than 4ihg or 9 with mech.

I decided to upgrade a D9 instead

See the "upgrading a Mezzo thread" or "Mezzo dualdrive conversion"