Advocacy & Safety - NYC Ruling - Ride Limits Article

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
Sorry if this is a double anywhere. Interesting ruling.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Last Updated: 4:10 PM, February 16, 2010
Posted: 2:30 PM, February 16, 2010
A judge says it is constitutional for New York City to require groups of 50 people on bicycles to get a parade permit from the police department. Judge Lewis Kaplan’s ruling Tuesday came in a clash between cyclists and police that began when more than 260 bicyclists were arrested during the 2004 Republican National Convention. Kaplan said he is sympathetic to cyclists’ concerns. He said he was not persuaded by the argument that the 50-person threshold is arbitrary and lower than necessary to achieve “the city’s substantial interests in safety, efficiency and traffic flow.” In ruling, Kaplan tossed out the lawsuit brought by the Five Borough Bicycle Club and interested bicycle enthusiasts. A message left with the bike riders’ lawyers was not immediately returned.
Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/judge_sides_with_city_in_bike_ride_G7uYY5NwRh71nQp3TaEXzN#ixzz0fjjL30s3
Does the same requirement hold for groups of 50 motorists?
Digital_Cowboy
02-16-10, 03:20 PM
Does the same requirement hold for groups of 50 motorists?
Or 50 pedestrians walking down the sidewalk?
frymaster
02-16-10, 03:26 PM
ah, yes, "the right of the people peaceably to assemble [with permit ej27/b submitted with mandatory, non-refundable $25 processing fee fourteen business days prior to event], and to petition the government for a redress of grievances"
sggoodri
02-16-10, 03:42 PM
But does the law requiring a parade permit apply to (1) the parade organizer, (2) the cyclists corking intersections and running red lights, or (3) lawfully operating bicycle drivers who happen to be on the same corridor at the same time as the illegal parade?
I have no problem with fining (1) the parade organizer for violation of the law requiring a parade permit. I have no problem with giving traffic tickets to (2) unlawfully operating cyclists when there is no parade permit. But I think it's ridiculous to charge (3) lawful bicycle drivers just because there are a lot of cyclists on the roadway. That's equivalent to banning them from traveling on that route at that time just because they have a bike rather than a car.
I'm a card-carrying member of the ACLU, but if the plaintiffs mixed these three groups together, I think they totally botched the case and deserved to lose.
TwoShort
02-17-10, 04:23 PM
Does the same requirement hold for groups of 50 motorists?
Motorists need multiple licenses & permits from the government to use the roads even just as single individuals.
Bicyclist currently have considerably more freedom than motorists to use the roads without government licensing or interference. Not quite as much freedom to do so as before some "cycling advocates" demanded review of legal standards that were in cyclist favor to begin with, but still pretty good.
hairnet
02-17-10, 04:29 PM
So what happens if I get caught by a mass and then get ticketed? What if two masses converge at an intersection and get stopped by cops?
Critical Mass (we all know this is what it's about) is autonomous, you can't shut it down or cancel it! It doesn't have leaders, and there isn't an organizing body to be stopped. So good luck with that.
cudak888
02-17-10, 04:52 PM
So what happens if I get caught by a mass and then get ticketed? What if two masses converge at an intersection and get stopped by cops?
The judge doesn't give a crap. You're a cyclist. Guilty as charged. Pass "GO," do not collect $200, go to jail, pay the fine.
-Kurt
http://bikesnobnyc.blogspot.com/2010/02/backward-circles-fight-for-no-right-to.html
cudak888
02-17-10, 05:55 PM
http://bikesnobnyc.blogspot.com/2010/02/backward-circles-fight-for-no-right-to.html
Consequently, they've succeeded in creating the first social movement in history to actually criminalize the very thing it's advocating.
:roflmao:
-Kurt
hairnet
02-17-10, 07:01 PM
The judge doesn't give a crap. You're a cyclist. Guilty as charged. Pass "GO," do not collect $200, go to jail, pay the fine.
-Kurt
hurray
I hope this crap doesn't find its way to LA. If it does then this city will lose the only thing that keeps me happy here.
Greyryder
02-17-10, 07:17 PM
I'm waiting to hear about the protest rides, by groups of 49 cyclists.
Dahon.Steve
02-17-10, 08:29 PM
Wow! The Five Borough Bike Club lost the case! I ride in this club and it's sad because now we can get pulled over and ticketed. Most of the time, there are less then 50 cyclist but they hold that trip to Montauk (sp) Long Island which I'm certain attracts way more than the legal limit. I guess they're going to have to apply for permits on the big rides.
cudak888
02-17-10, 09:30 PM
I'm waiting to hear about the protest rides, by groups of 49 cyclists.
So am I. This ought to be fun. :popcorn
-Kurt
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.