Road Cycling - Trek Pilot?

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
Kris Flatlander
08-19-04, 03:46 PM
So I was just checking out the Trek site and took a look at their 2005 model "sneak peak", I noticed the Pilot model right away, the bars on it are at a wierd angle and a funny shape, it has the same type of frame as the 2100-2300 but has more slope to the top tube and has stuff ranging from the 105/Ultegra spec on up, anybody know anything about these? Can you explain the advantages of the different components/geometry? Here's the link.
http://www.trekbikes.com/bikes/2005/index_preview.jsp
Looks like Trek is finally getting into the "compact geometry" frames. I think there are several old threads debating "compact geometry" vs. "classic geometry". Typically, the advantages are said to be:
- stiffness - smaller triangles are stronger.
- lighter - less frame material used (you can debate how much lighter).
- comfort - because of the longer exposed seat post, you get a bit of compliance from the seat post to cushion the ride.
Iron Chef
08-19-04, 04:01 PM
They say builders can get by by offering fewer framer size options with compact geometry. Though it looks like Trek is offerring 6 frame size choices. They typically offer 7 sizes in trad. geometry.
Phatman
08-19-04, 04:38 PM
I think it looks goofy with they way they are photographed. the bars look really high.
condor63
08-19-04, 05:45 PM
I'm glad I bought my 2004 5200 since it's not even being offered anymore; the pilot line doesn't really do it for me and the roads here in Southern California desert area are extremely bad, the Madones stiffness would really jolt me & what's up with that rear fin.
shokhead
08-20-04, 08:26 AM
You didny see the 5.2's or the 5.2SL's? The pilot i was told has plastic between the carbon layers.
condor63
08-20-04, 10:28 AM
The Trek 5.2SL look's nice but for $3,219.99 with Ultegra WOW, even thou it's the new 10 speed. Hopefully in the near future the upgrade to Dura-ace will occur for me but I'm very content for now.:)
Phatman
08-20-04, 03:50 PM
hey, they took the pilot off the site.
shokhead
08-20-04, 05:14 PM
Well i've already seen an 05 trek catalog and they have them in there. They also took the top of the line carbon off to.
crosscut
08-20-04, 05:23 PM
hey, they took the pilot off the site.
Sheesh, I thought I was going crazy, I was looking everywhere for it.
Why did they take it off the site? Anyone know?
Grampy™
08-20-04, 05:26 PM
My LBS says the Pilot has a taller head tube. I think they are gearing it towards the "Grampy's" out there that still ride but don't want the aggressive design of the other carbon Treks.
Kris Flatlander
08-20-04, 11:30 PM
ya was shootin the bull witht he local Trek dealer and he mentioned there's some type of gel between the carbon fork and the crabon seatstays that makes the ride and little bit smoother.
velocipedio
08-21-04, 06:42 AM
the pilot seems positioned to go for some of the market between the specialized sequoia and roubaix. as the road market ages, there is a growing market for a performance comfort road bike. look at klein: for 2005, they're putting an elastomer bumper into the seatstay of the aura series.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.