Road Cycling - A good price or not??

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
I am interested in getting a road bike and would like to know what do you think about this offer:
It is Olympia Flash Race and has Columbus Altec 2+ aluminum tubs, Campy Centaur group and Campy Scirocco wheels. The frame without the forks weight in about 1250-1300g, and the weight of the whole bike is about 8.8kg. You can read more about it at http://www.olympiacicli.it/course5.html
The price stands at $1400(US)!
So what do you think??:confused:
Thanks,
Blaz
http://www.angeluccicicli.com/foto%20olympia/flash_race.jpg
heavy, for the price. Centaur is kinda cheap for that price, too.
velocipedio
03-18-02, 01:41 PM
Actually, I rather like Centaur. The hubs are lighter than Chorus and the shifting is flawless. I'd argue that Centaur is a damned fine, raceable group. I wouldn't want to see it on a bike over, say, $1,750, but it fits nicely on a $1,400 bike.
I love my Centaur (triple) as well.
Which makes this as good a place as any to ask about the comment I see in many places to the effect that Shimano shifts soooooo smoothly. I find it hard to believe that anything could be noticeably smoother than my Campa Centaur has been.
I also see comments about the Campa front derailleur, with the "single step adjustments". It certainly is useful on my bike, so I wonder how the Shimano version eliminates the chain/cage interaction in all positions. Shorter cage? ???
Anyone?
Cheers...Gary
velocipedio
03-19-02, 07:20 AM
Let's put it this way... I have Daytona on my road bike and 105 on my cyclocross bike. While I love my cross bike dearly, and I find that 105 does shift sligtly more smoothly [less pressure required on the levers], it comes up short. IMO, compared to Daytona. The areas where prefer Daytona:
1. Parts quality -- they seem better machined than 105, though I can't speak for the chainrings since I have Sugino 38/48 rings rather than 105.
2. Accuracy -- I have never missed a shift on Daytona, but I have a couple of times on 105, although that might have something to do with the fact that it's on the 'cross bike. I do find that Daytona shifts much more efficiently under load -- that mercy downshift on a 25% grade is a godsend.
3. Trimming -- Campy lets you trim your chainline more effectively than Shimano.
4. Ergonomics -- I find the Campy shifters more comfortable than Shimano.
Personally, I'd rank Centaur/Daytona closer to Ultegra in quality and performance... And you can't beat that 10-speed thing. [Though admittedly, it can be a pain to maintain...]
I have suspected for a while what two of the leading magazines over here have actually put in print recently. Normally, when they compare Campagnolo and Shimano, thery are in a prose layout, and can be vague about making equivalences. Now I have seen two that actually put a matrix together.
In both cases, it is Record/Chorus vs Dura Ace; Centaur vs Ultegra; and then the rest in some way. Clearly, the Chorus being exactly the same bits in design, but with less Ti and C in their makeup, are considered the equivalent of DA. It is really a weight issue alone (not to mention cost) between the two.
As for the easier shifting with your 105, I guess I would have to try it. As I say, my Centaur is like silk already.
Cheers...Gary
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.