Hybrid Bicycles - Belt-driven hybrids with hydraulic brakes

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
Hi. I'm gonna buy a hybrid bike sometime soon and I'm looking for the perfect one for me. A suspensionless bike with an internal-gear hub and good hydraulic disc brakes is what I am looking for. All-weather use and low maintenance are important to me. I would also prefer the bike to have a belt instead of a chain.
So far I've found a few candidates:
Charge Mixer (http://www.chargebikes.com/products/bikes/detail2.php?id=28) (cons: rather heavy because of the steel frame)
Scott Sub 10 (http://www.scott-sports.com/gb_en/product/9105/45253/sub_10) (cons: chain instead of a belt)
Kona Dr. Fine (http://www.konaworld.com/bike.cfm?content=drfine) (cons: chain instead of a belt)
Mongoose Sabrosa Ocho (http://www.mongoose.com/isl/eng/mtn/Products/Mountain-Urban/Commuter/Details/2840-M10SABO-Sabrosa-Ocho) (cons: chain instead of a belt)
Are there any bikes in this price range (up to around $1000) I should be aware of?
AdelaaR
07-14-10, 11:10 AM
What is so wrong with a chain that you do not want one?
Doesn't a belt have more friction and thus more resistance?
What is so wrong with a chain that you do not want one?
Doesn't a belt have more friction and thus more resistance?
To quote an article I read about carbon belts vs. chains (which might be wrong, I'm no expert): The many benefits of a belt – nearly impossible to break or cut, long life, no grease, easier on pants legs, no rust, no stretching, low maintenance...
If belts have more friction, then I might be more inclined to get a chain instead. I also just learned that internal-hub gears have a bit of extra friction, making them less efficient than derailleurs, so...
qmsdc15
07-14-10, 01:38 PM
From what I hear, the biggest downside of internal geared hubs vs, derailleurs is the additional weight and not so much added friction. Belt drives seems to be a great improvement over chains. The only downside is that you can't use belt drive with derailleurs.
I wouldn't buy an IGH bike unless it had belt drive, but to be honest, if I needed another bike, I'd probably choose a chain drive w/ traditional external gear shifting mechanisms. The belt drive is very appealing to me though, the IGH, not so much, though IGHs have advantages as well. I'm a bit of a "weight weenie" I guess. (Overly concerned with the weight of my bike and it's components.)
Sorry to post a reply that doesn't address your question. I just wanted to encourage you to choose a belt drive model should you decide on an IGH bike. My advice is based on little knowledge and no experience with this technology, so take it with a grain of salt. :o
Justiss
07-14-10, 09:16 PM
I shopped extensively for a belt driven, IGH bike and ended up with a Norco Ceres, which I am digging. There are a couple belt/IGH/hydro-disc combos available but not even close to $1,000.
Justiss
dynaryder
07-15-10, 08:40 AM
I test rode a Sub,didn't care for the alloy fork. The Mongoose also has one,but those fat tires should compensate. I own a Dew Deluxe,basically the same frameset as the Dr Fine,and really like it. Without a Charge to test ride,I'd recommend the Kona.
Probably out of the price range, but Raleigh has a belt drive/disc brake model that also has a dynohub: http://www.raleighusa.com/bikes/hybrid/alley-way/?page=overview
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.