Framebuilders - Need a Second Opinion here, Please

OK, I like road bikes and drop bars. Looking at a new titanium frame.

I'm an old fart, not as limber as I used to be. Consequently I need handlebars quite a bit higher than the norm. Actually, what works best for me is to use fork with uncut alloy steerer with high-rise stem mounted at the top of the steerer ala Sheldon:
http://sheldonbrown.com/images/iro-584-09.jpg


Since this puts a lot of stress on the steer tube, I have mentioned to the framebuilder that I would like to leave the frame geometry exactly the same as on his standard frame, only lengthening the head tube at the top by a couple of inches.

He says "A long head tube extension above the top tube puts
a lot more stress on the top tube / head tube junction
(since the forces can't be dissipated in the steer tube
as easily). "

His solution is to modify the frame to incorporate the longer head tube I desire by raising the top tube proportionally, with the limiting factor being the standover height in the middle of the top tube.

His solution of course requires a custom frame which is more $$.

Besides the increased $$, I have reservations (1) that the frame is going to look like a weird mutant and (2) I don't really understand/buy into his reason for not just lengthening the head tube at the top.

I agree that using the whole length of the uncut steerer is going to magnify the stresses on the headtube, but those same stresses will be there whether the head tube is 4" or 7" (because the headset rigidly locks the steerer into the headtube).. If the head tube is 7" it will help support the steerer which is what I'm looking for.

We're talking about a metal frame here, not carbon. I am 145 pounds and never pedal while standing, due to physical limitations. So i'm comfortable with the use of the full steerer--it's a given--I'm using this arrangement on my 2 bikes now, and it works fine. The question is how best to have the head tube support the steerer. Maybe I should just go with the standard head-tube length, but on this model it's only 10.5cm--supporting a 30cm steerer with a hi-rise stem on top. Seems like it needs some help.

The framebuilder is a nice guy and I don't want to offend him.

What do you experts think about this?

Agree with your builder.
Here is an example of a tandem with such a configuration.smiley tandem

Agree with your builder.
Here is an example of a tandem with such a configuration.smiley tandem

OK, In light of the way I describe myself and riding habit, do you think there is significant advantage to be gained by longer headtube, or would stock work just about the same?

it's pretty common to lengthen the head tube. There is certainly more stress in the head tube, I don't think there is any more stress on the head tube/top tube junction. If you are worried about the bike looking like a mutant, I think that extended head tubes look worse than slanty top tubes. I've thought about this a lot, I think it's really difficult to make a bike with a tall stem look good.

Why not just change that too straight HBar ??
If there is a 2" rise in the bar then the post can go down 2".
I'm using my upsidedown 1974 Raleigh bar on my hybrid, after i got tired of a bar like yours, but mine had a 1" rise at least.
There was a 4" change in height, with the turn over.

OK, so we agree that it's gonna look dorky no matter what.

My question at this point is should i go for the longer head tube the way the framebuilder recommends, which would cost more and offer marginal structural benefit? Or would i be just about as safe with a stock setup?

I guess I'm concerned that with a steerer tube that long, it may deform under stress with just a tiny short headtube.

Why not just change that too straight HBar ??
If there is a 2" rise in the bar then the post can go down 2".
I'm using my upsidedown 1974 Raleigh bar on my hybrid, after i got tired of a bar like yours, but mine had a 1" rise at least.
There was a 4" change in height, with the turn over.

That's Sheldon's bar in the picture. i use drop bars.

Oh sorry, I noticed after.

Oh sorry, I noticed after.

But thanks anyway!

I'm thinking that what the builder is recommending would look something like this:

160529

Like the OP, at 68 I'm not as flexible as I used to be and need a higher bar than I did thirty years ago.

My 2007 Waterford has a threaded 1" headset. Like many modern lug sets, the Newvex top head lug is made for a longer head tube extension above the top tube than lugs thirty years ago. We left the steerer tube full length and used four spacers between the headset and the steerer locknut. The quill stem doesn't look abnormally long (because it isn't) and has a standard 17° extension angle, yet the bar is at a comfortable height for me. This setup works well for me without looking too dorky.

http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d7/k4drd/Bicycles/Waterford%20B07014/CIMG6689med.jpg

http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d7/k4drd/Bicycles/Waterford%20B07014/CIMG6690med.jpg

Jeez, love the craftsmanship on that bike. is that a Tubus rack?

I'd really like to see close-up photos of how it's attached, top and bottom. Please?

Jeez, love the craftsmanship on that bike. is that a Tubus rack?

I'd really like to see close-up photos of how it's attached, top and bottom. Please?

Yes; it's a Tubus Luna.

The monostay is bolted to a stainless tab secured to the brake bridge with the brake mounting bolt.

http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d7/k4drd/Bicycles/Waterford%20B07014/MonostayAttachmentsm.jpg
The bottom is bolted to the rear dropout eyelet on both sides. It's very secure.

http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d7/k4drd/Bicycles/Waterford%20B07014/cimg5939.jpg

http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d7/k4drd/Bicycles/Waterford%20B07014/LeftDropoutEyeletAttachmentsm.jpg

http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d7/k4drd/Bicycles/Waterford%20B07014/RightDropoutEyeletAttachmentsm.jpg

Your bike is awesome, Stan. (way to thread-jack by awesomeness)

Stan, is that a threaded headset?

Your bike is awesome, Stan. (way to thread-jack by awesomeness)

Thanks! The bike attracts lots of attention.


Stan, is that a threaded headset?

Yep; 1" threaded headset.

[QUOTE=Scooper;11142688]Like the OP, at 68 I'm not as flexible as I used to be and need a higher bar than I did thirty years ago.

My 2007 Waterford has a threaded 1" headset. Like many modern lug sets, the Newvex top head lug is made for a longer head tube extension above the top tube than lugs thirty years ago. We left the steerer tube full length and used four spacers between the headset and the steerer locknut. The quill stem doesn't look abnormally long (because it isn't) and has a standard 17° extension angle, yet the bar is at a comfortable height for me. This setup works well for me without looking too dorky.

What is frame material? I was thinking Ti, but maybe stainless steel? How hard to preserve polish/shine?

It's Reynolds 953 stainless steel. All I've ever done to maintain the shine is wipe it down with a damp terrycloth towel when it gets dirty.

There's nothing wrong with titanium, but I like steel and I like lugs. :D

I think what I'm going to do is just buy an off-the-rack frame, use The entire uncut steer tube of the fork, but instead of "no spacers" (like Sheldon photo in post #1 above), I'm going to find one long piece of the stock that they cut the spacers from--a piece about 9cm long, and use it as one big spacer. That should provide sufficient support.

Do any of you guys know where I could find this spacer stock? I'd like to buy 3 pieces, each 9cm long, to fit 1 1/8" steer tube. That should last me the rest of this incarnation!

do you have a lathe? You can buy thick wall aluminum tubing from many sources

Chris King (http://www.competitivecyclist.com/road-bikes/product-components/2010-chris-king-headset-spacer-1862.29.1.html) 1-1/8" spacers are available in four heights: 3mm, 6mm, 12mm, and 25mm. Anodized colors are: Black, Silver, Red, Navy, and Pewter.

D
Don't have a lathe. Everybody has spacers in short heights--my need here is for one continuous piece 10cm or however long, for rigidity to support steerer.

do you have a lathe? You can buy thick wall aluminum tubing from many sources
please name a few of the many. thanks

You might try contacting Purely Custom (http://www.purelycustom.com/c-98-aluminum-headset-spacers.aspx) to see if they'll cut you a 10cm long spacer. They do make a 4cm long 1-1/8" spacer, but there might be an engineering reason they don't go longer.

The aluminum alloy spacers are typically 7050 or 7075-T6 seamless. Measuring a 1-1/8" spacer, the I.D. is 28.8mm (to fit over a 28.6mm O.D. steerer) and the O.D. is 35.0mm.

Stan, is that a threaded headset?

+1

you might consider something like this...... but it is for threaded stems


http://www.rivbike.com/products/show/nitto-dirtdrop/16-100

please name a few of the many. thanks

Online Metals, Aircraft Spruce, McMaster-Carr.

I checked Aircraft Spruce & Specialty, and they don't have anything close to the wall thickness required for spacers.

mcmaster's 1 1/8 id tubing is also a bit thin. Probably have to start out with solid, it usually doesn't end up being much more expensive than tubing.

for headset spacers they are in compression , ID is all that matters, if you add a thin but wide spacer on top and bottom I expect It's fine ..

a Carbon tube spacer as sold is thicker wall tube making thousands of them they get the tubes made to Spec. then cut to length (on a machine that does only that).

Aluminum Cane Creek Interlok spacers go to a smooth outside for looks,
then their interlocking system on it's inside face slides closely over the steerer tube,
metal between is thinned, could just as well be the other way .

I bought three packets of Plastic Interlok spacers , and stacked them up to a 4" height.

[I have some left over] they are fine .. 9/8" ID 11/8" OD

But I'm using a Steel steerer tube .

George Hincappie may have finished Roubaix that day, with a steel steerer
even if a Carbon Bladed fork.

he instead crashed in a drainage ditch along side a Farm field on the way there .

He had an Aluminum steerer, and they, pro race mechanics, cut theirs short.

then again the several hundred year old cobbled Farm tracks are a National heritage site ..

... Unlike any thing in 'the States'. :injured:

thanks for the help!