General Cycling Discussion - Name that size!

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
ziggy_stardust
07-26-10, 09:51 PM
Can anyone tell me what size they think this frame is?
http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs638.snc3/32031_590059783786_48502504_33894737_627224_n.jpg
badamsjr
07-26-10, 10:32 PM
If you are looking for help in figuring out the size, measure from the center of the crank spindle bolt to the center/top of the top tube.
If you want guesses, I'll go with 58--solely on the head tube length.;)
LesterOfPuppets
07-26-10, 10:48 PM
another vote for 58cm.
Mr. Beanz
07-26-10, 10:59 PM
I say 58cm.
Jeff Wills
07-26-10, 11:07 PM
58cm-ish.
531phile
07-26-10, 11:09 PM
58cm
pablosnazzy
07-26-10, 11:59 PM
well, your standard park bench has an overall height of 31 ½ " . based off of the top tube being just under the top of the bench, correcting for angle of picture, and taking into account the length and angle of the shadow cast, if i were to triangulate those figures, i would say the size of the bike is either a grande or venti, no room for cream, thanks.
TopGear
07-27-10, 07:09 AM
Looks like a 58cm frame to me, too.
ziggy_stardust
08-02-10, 06:14 AM
Welp, I'd say 58 then, haha. I was leaning towards 56cm, so I'll take 58.
cyccommute
08-02-10, 06:52 AM
If you are looking for help in figuring out the size, measure from the center of the crank spindle bolt to the center/top of the top tube.
If you want guesses, I'll go with 58--solely on the head tube length.;)
Looking at the headtube length, I'd put it at 25" or about 63cm. I measured the crank arm in the picture and assumed a 170mm crank then worked out a ratio of picture length to fit that 170mm crank. Applying that ratio to the frame, I came up with something very close to 63cm.
The best way to tell is to measure the seat tube, of course.
BlazingPedals
08-02-10, 01:14 PM
I'll split the difference and say 57cm.
dcrowell
08-02-10, 02:48 PM
On my monitor, it's about 3 inches... maybe 2.87.
cranky old road
08-02-10, 02:59 PM
Looking at the headtube length, I'd put it at 25" or about 63cm. I measured the crank arm in the picture and assumed a 170mm crank then worked out a ratio of picture length to fit that 170mm crank. Applying that ratio to the frame, I came up with something very close to 63cm.
The best way to tell is to measure the seat tube, of course.
I like your thinking but a more definitive standard might be the diameter of the wheels rather than the crank length. I wonder if they are 700c or 27"?
cyccommute
08-02-10, 04:04 PM
I like your thinking but a more definitive standard might be the diameter of the wheels rather than the crank length. I wonder if they are 700c or 27"?
Ratios are just about the same. The difference between a 27" rim and a 700 C is only 7mm in real life. On the screen that's almost unmeasurable.
Here's a 63cm from Craigslist
http://images.craigslist.org/3k03m13p85Y65Q25S1a7pbeb6fcbfd68b1870.jpg
Here's ziggy's picture
http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs638.snc3/32031_590059783786_48502504_33894737_627224_n.jpg
and here's a 58cm
http://images.craigslist.org/3nc3k23lc5Y25T05Q3a82bb19a8be9c871334.jpg
Definitely a 63cm
wahoonc
08-02-10, 05:08 PM
60cm and too small for me...
Aaron :)
CNY James
08-02-10, 06:17 PM
i would have said 60-62cm... the head tube is a lot longer than on my 56 cm bikes... & I like cycommute's method, its a little more scientific than eyeballing.
wahoonc
08-02-10, 06:42 PM
i would have said 60-62cm... the head tube is a lot longer than on my 56 cm bikes... & I like cycommute's method, its a little more scientific than eyeballing.
But maybe we have calibrated eyeballs...:roflmao2:
Aaron :)
cyccommute
08-02-10, 10:14 PM
But maybe we have calibrated eyeballs...:roflmao2:
Aaron :)
I actually have calibrated eyeballs (I knew the head tube was too tall for a 58) but I just wanted something a bit more empirical to back up the eyeballs;)
badamsjr
08-02-10, 10:32 PM
cyccommute: If your pics of the 63cm and 58cm are 'normal' size, then the OP's pic MAY be a 59 or 60, but there seems to be quite a bit of difference in head tube length in the 63 pic and the OP's pic.
zachdees
08-03-10, 12:00 AM
those are definately 26" rims
cyccommute
08-03-10, 08:56 AM
cyccommute: If your pics of the 63cm and 58cm are 'normal' size, then the OP's pic MAY be a 59 or 60, but there seems to be quite a bit of difference in head tube length in the 63 pic and the OP's pic.
There is some variance between manufactures on headtube length (lots of it actually:rolleyes:) but the main thing to look at is that the headtube on ziggy's picture is much longer than the 23" bike I posted. Look at the seatstays and how high the top tube is in relation to the rear wheel. Ziggy's is much closer to a 25" than the 23".
I wouldn't try this, by the way, with a sloping top tube bike. But old horizontal top tube frames are pretty easy to eyeball the size...especially big boys like this one.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.