Bicycle Mechanics - Broken Sugino XD Crank
Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
A couple of days ago while pedaling home from work, my Sugino XD triple right crank arm broke. The crank arm cracked open and broke off about 2" above the pedal threads. The break is perpendicular to the crank arm. The bike has never been crashed. Luckily I noticed my pedal was feeling out of whack before the crank arm broke off completely, and I had slowed down to investigate - otherwise if it had failed suddenly I could have found myself on the ground.
The crank has been on a Rivendell Atlantis since 2002. I've put about 35,000 miles on the bike in that time, mostly commute miles and general purpose pedaling around Orange County. Anyone else broken a cold forged aluminum Sugino crank like this before?
I'm not complaining about this component failure since I got good use from it and no harm was done. Just curious if this is very common. Last time I broke a crank was in about 1986 and it was an Ofmega road crank that cracked open at the pedal threads. That failure put me on the ground and I got scraped up pretty good.
Sometimes the shoe rub against the cranks enough to create a stress riser leading to a eventual failure about there. Haven't had it happen to me, but I thin I remember some posts by Jobst Brandt about it on another forum.
09-12-10, 06:55 PM
One of my colleagues in our engineering department said the fatigue loading curve for aluminum alloys never really flattens out as the number of stress cycles approaches infinity. Because aircraft are often largely aluminum alloy construction and there are some quite old ones still operating, I thought he must have been exaggerating. Otherwise there would be frequent crashes because some metal parts would reach their endurance limits.
But after a little research, it turns out aircraft parts are indeed frequently inspected for the development of surface defects then are statistically "lifed." Frequently used parts typically do not last much past 20-25 years and are replaced on a regular maintenance schedule. The older aircraft still in use have lived so long because they have not been in constant service.
Can't say I know much about failure in Sugino cold-forged cranks (my XD-600's have worked fine now for the past two months / 400 miles), but wiki has an interesting article on metal fatigue that does indeed seem to add validity to my coworker's claim:
Note the broken aluminum bicycle crank used as an example. The S-N / Wohler (or Stress vs Number of cycles) curve is what I refer to as the fatigue loading curve. As an engineer you estimate the number of stress cycles in the life of a part in coordination with the greatest stress imposed on the most stressed part of the item, repeating the process many times as you iterate through various section moduli/ cross sections. There's always a tradeoff between light weight/ flexibiity and high factor of safety strength/ rigidity. With their S-N graph for "brittle aluminum", a part whose most stressed point is at a safety factor of 4 to begin its life will theoretically have a 50-50 chance of failure in 10^7 (ten million) stress cycles.
If for instance, your drive tire's circumference were 2130 mm (my estimation for 622 x 28), and your average gearing is 2.5:1, you would get 5.325 meters (17.5 feet) per crank rotation... That would net you 302 crank revolution per mile - if you said you put 35,000 miles on those cranks, that might equate to 10,570,000 cycles. While the cranks may have started life with a 4:1 factor of safety, the fracture at the end probably was a product of cyclic fatigue that expanded the defect(s) enough to lower it to 1:1.
dabac's point about scratches being stress risers is germane to the explanation as well, because the stress riser often becomes the most stressed part of a structure, and as they illustrate with the broken crank, potentially the original source in the ultimate failure's timeline.
04-03-11, 06:50 AM
zepher and dabac, I just did the same thing to my 175mm XD-500T drive side crank last night. Luckily was starting from a dead stop when it broke. Double lucky because the 1 yr old and 3 yr old were in the trailer behind and I didn't go down!
Sure enough, shoe scuff marks on the cranks above and below where it broke. And I DO like to have my toes pointed out, so heel strike on the crank arm is more likely. Will be looking into some 3M anti-scuff tape for my crank arms because that's how I ride and how I like to ride. Thanks for the tip dabac.
04-03-11, 09:02 AM
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.