NOS88
10-14-10, 12:46 PM
OK, I've had both bikes (Colnago Master XL & Indy Fab Ti CJ) long enough to put over 300 miles on each. So, I thought I'd share my impressions of both.
First, both bikes are a joy to ride. This is due in large part to a correct fit!!! I will never underestimate correct fit again. For years I thought the correct size for me was 56cm. I was wrong. The Indy Fab was custom built and it is spot on in terms of fit. Ironically, the Colnago is very close in terms of frame size and fit. Both are 55cm from center of seat tube to center of head tube and 55cm from top of seat tube to center of bottom bracket. The overall wheelbase is the same for both. The chain stays, however on the IF are 2 cm longer. So, I assume this means that frame angle must be a bit different.
When I first got on the IF I thought I had made a big mistake. It felt harsh and stiff. I quickly remembered that the Dura Ace wheels were stiffer than the Maivc Open Pros I usually ride. Once I put the Open Pros on the ride was what I was hoping for. I'll gladly trade the few grams of weight for a more comfortable ride.
The IF is very comfortable over chip seal roads and eats up most vibrations with ease. The Colnago does the same. Out of the two, the Colnago is smoother in terms of almost no road vibration (the quality steel feel so many folks like). Yet the IF is more comfortable than my S-Works Roubaix or my Jamis Eclipse.
The Colnago is not as stiff in the bottom bracket and this is noticeable when climbing. It climbs well, but the IF seems to almost fly uphill in comparison. The same is true when sprinting on the flats. The IF is just quicker while the Colnago doesn't return quite as much forward motion with each pedal stroke.
In terms of stability, both are very, very good. I find myself testing to see where the limits are when cutting into a corner, and think the real limiting factor right now is the tires on the bikes. The IF does have an advantage on downhills and rough stuff. It doesn't get at all skittish when hitting a patch of washboard while the Colnago dances around just a little bit. I've descended on both at over 40 mph and felt no vibration or loss of road feel. At 45 mph the Colnago began to feel a bit less stable, but that could be something as simple as headset adjustments.
In terms of looks and workmanship both bikes are beautiful in different ways. The eye candy of the art decour painting and chrome lugs on the Colnago are difficult to ignore. Yet, the workmanship on the IF is so stunning, that it has it's own unique beauty.
If I had to pick one of the two to just look at, I'd probably pick the Colnago. Yet, if I had to pick just one to ride, I'd take the IF. Fortunately, I don't have to make the choice right now and am looking forward to many more miles on both.
First, both bikes are a joy to ride. This is due in large part to a correct fit!!! I will never underestimate correct fit again. For years I thought the correct size for me was 56cm. I was wrong. The Indy Fab was custom built and it is spot on in terms of fit. Ironically, the Colnago is very close in terms of frame size and fit. Both are 55cm from center of seat tube to center of head tube and 55cm from top of seat tube to center of bottom bracket. The overall wheelbase is the same for both. The chain stays, however on the IF are 2 cm longer. So, I assume this means that frame angle must be a bit different.
When I first got on the IF I thought I had made a big mistake. It felt harsh and stiff. I quickly remembered that the Dura Ace wheels were stiffer than the Maivc Open Pros I usually ride. Once I put the Open Pros on the ride was what I was hoping for. I'll gladly trade the few grams of weight for a more comfortable ride.
The IF is very comfortable over chip seal roads and eats up most vibrations with ease. The Colnago does the same. Out of the two, the Colnago is smoother in terms of almost no road vibration (the quality steel feel so many folks like). Yet the IF is more comfortable than my S-Works Roubaix or my Jamis Eclipse.
The Colnago is not as stiff in the bottom bracket and this is noticeable when climbing. It climbs well, but the IF seems to almost fly uphill in comparison. The same is true when sprinting on the flats. The IF is just quicker while the Colnago doesn't return quite as much forward motion with each pedal stroke.
In terms of stability, both are very, very good. I find myself testing to see where the limits are when cutting into a corner, and think the real limiting factor right now is the tires on the bikes. The IF does have an advantage on downhills and rough stuff. It doesn't get at all skittish when hitting a patch of washboard while the Colnago dances around just a little bit. I've descended on both at over 40 mph and felt no vibration or loss of road feel. At 45 mph the Colnago began to feel a bit less stable, but that could be something as simple as headset adjustments.
In terms of looks and workmanship both bikes are beautiful in different ways. The eye candy of the art decour painting and chrome lugs on the Colnago are difficult to ignore. Yet, the workmanship on the IF is so stunning, that it has it's own unique beauty.
If I had to pick one of the two to just look at, I'd probably pick the Colnago. Yet, if I had to pick just one to ride, I'd take the IF. Fortunately, I don't have to make the choice right now and am looking forward to many more miles on both.
Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.