Road Cycling - Folding tires?

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
I am partial to the Vittorias we have now. No good reason except that they have not given us any trouble yet, and I can match my bike color too. :)
But I am thinking about getting at least one folding tire to carry as a spare when we ride. Which raises several questions.
1. Any reason that is not a good idea?
2. What are the practical differences between wire and kevlar bead tires?
3. Any major disadvantages to kevlar beads?
We are talking about 700x23 tires.
Thanks...Gary
RainmanP
04-04-02, 12:57 PM
Gary,
I know several people who use kevlar beads satisfactorily exclusively for the weight savings. I use inexpensive Vittoria wire beads because tires get cut up so fast on my commuting. I went through a couple of pair of expensive Continentals and Specialized before I gave up and went to inexpensive tires. I also have a folding tire for emergencies.
Regards,
Raymond
poptart
04-04-02, 01:01 PM
I only use folding tires.
Vredestein Fortezzas are my favorites.
I'm curious about your need to carry a spare(since we are talking about clinchers as opposed to tubulars).
If you are doing long tours and/or cutting your tires frequently you can often get by by carrying a tire boot. A dollar bill or an energy food wrapper can be used in an emergency.
poptart -
You must have missed the thread somewhere about anal-retents. :D
This is a belt-and-suspenders approach to things, which I tend to exercise even more as I age. The extra weight vs the peace of mind seems like a reasonable tradeoff.
Cheers...Gary
nathank
04-05-02, 03:19 AM
as far as i know the only disadvantage to folding kevlar bead is cost - they're usually lighter and just as if not more durable than cheaper wire bead.
i took a spare with me touring - but it also served a second purpose - i had a MTB with slicks and brought a knobby tire to put on the rear for day-trip off-road where a slick is not so good
roadbuzz
04-08-02, 08:22 PM
In my experience, the Kevlar bead stretches a little, so they are manufactured small. It makes them harder to put on when new, so you may have to use tire tools to mount them. Hardly a drawback, just watch out for your tube. Also, because of the stretch factor, you probably only want to mount them on rims with a J-hook (the outer edges of the rim bend inward, and give the tire bead something to catch on). The failure mode is a tire that "blows off" the rim, with a 3 inch tear in the tube. The Nashbar catalog use to have an illustration showing both types of rims, but I haven't seen any rims lately that don't have J-hooks, so it may not be an issue.
Originally posted by roadbuzz
Also, because of the stretch factor, you probably only want to mount them on rims with a J-hook (the outer edges of the rim bend inward, and give the tire bead something to catch on). The failure mode is a tire that "blows off" the rim, with a 3 inch tear in the tube. The Nashbar catalog use to have an illustration showing both types of rims, but I haven't seen any rims lately that don't have J-hooks, so it may not be an issue.
This is a HUGE issue with older rims. Most modern tyres, whether folding or not, are designed explicitly for hook-beaded rims. (Read your sidewalls, everyone!) This is one reason we can have 100-120PSI today, versus 70PSI of yesteryear.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.