General Cycling Discussion - What would entice you to buy a new bike?

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
As far as the bicycle industry is concerned - I`m probably a terrible consumer and chances are things won`t get any better. The chances of selling me a brand new bike any time soon really don`t look good.
Its not that I don`t like bikes - quite the contrary - I tend to get attached and take care of them regardless of purchase price.
But after all these years the rather harsh reality of `new and improved` is looking more like `new and even more expensive` all the time. I know that lots of people won`t agree with me, but after building and driving a variety of carbon and titanium bikes - the only real advantage I`m seeing over a well designed steel frame is weight. It would be nice if they were lighter AND stronger - but the weight race seems to be an incentive for everyone to pare down the weight to the point necessary to just maintain the required strength for that particular dicipline.
So a $5,000 bike has got to be the worlds most expensive diet if the objective is just to shed 5 pounds or so. I know, I know - carbon fiber bikes are amazingly durable and great status symbols - my brother in law has one he keeps in his office and with how little he actually drives it - it`ll probably last forever!
And please don`t take this post overly seriously - a sense of humor goes a long way - especially when it comes to cyclists!
I have noticed that some of the clunkers I`ve rebuilt for friends (because their kids were priorities and that left no money for carbon fiber bikes) drove REALLY well once the bearings were properly greased and adjusted, and the cables updated with low friction stainless stuff.
And their priorities seem very much in line with some of what I`ve seen posted in some of the forums here. A comfy seat, a good set of tires, a couple water bottle cages for whatever - and you`re all set to go out for a run with the kids to the local ice-cream store. And as long as you keep them at a slight disadvantage by buying them cheap department store bikes with BMX or mtb bike tires - the weight and rolling resistance will give them all the exercise they need while making it a breeze to keep up with them!
So this summer I think that`ll be my next hobby - rescuing older bikes and equipping them with great seats, good tires and pedals - and looking for good homes for them. And all the money I won`t be spending on XT components will probably mean there`ll probably be a lot left over for ice cream. See? I do have my priorities straight!
Flying Merkel
03-09-11, 07:40 PM
I'm looking at getting a Cyclocross bike when my personal economy improves. Looks to be a class of bike that suits my needs perfectly.
My buddy had a beautiful Simonetti that needed a tuneup. I lubed the chain, tweaked the derailleur adjustments a bit and aired up the tires to 100 psi. I didn't tell him about the last item. He was amazed how fast & responsive the bike was. Never figured out just what I did.
Drew Eckhardt
03-09-11, 07:41 PM
As far as the bicycle industry is concerned - I`m probably a terrible consumer and chances are things won`t get any better. The chances of selling me a brand new bike any time soon really don`t look good.
I don't want a new bike but I'll get a frame sometime. I've been commuting 400 miles a month in all weather conditions and gotten too old to ride with a heavy back pack on my regular road frame. Something with longer chain stays and rack braze-ons would be nice.
I know that lots of people won`t agree with me, but after building and driving a variety of carbon and titanium bikes - the only real advantage I`m seeing over a well designed steel frame is weight.
My titanium frame with no paint looks better after 15 years than my previous steel frame did after 7.
Right now, nothing. We've got plenty of bikes and the kids aren't going to outgrow their current bikes for a few years. I've put together 2 in the last year or so. So pretty much set for the time being.
Robert_C
03-09-11, 10:12 PM
uh. . . a job.
Really, that is about it. A job in a place that I am likely to ride a bike. I finished my MBA to no jobs and decided to go back and spend another year working in China as I continue to apply for Jobs in The States. It is not that there is anything wrong with my old bikes, I just would like some new ones. Further, a new bike can satisfy that "new toy" craving and be paid for with cash; while, to do the same with a car would create a debt situation. In addition, I would rather a new bike.
The demise of the one I have. That's all.
Since it's four years old now (and approaching 15,000 miles), I am trying to marshal a list of replacement frames that would be accessible and affordable when my beloved XLT begins to show decrepitude.
My ULTIMATE bike would be the SC Nomad, built-up to my spec (so I'd be the one building it up). Last scan I took put the price for that build at about $3400. (But that's just about ALL new and top-line stuff, no transfers from the old frame)
Two other choices have intrigued me: Salsa's El Kaboing, and Ventana's El Ciclon. Either frame can be had right now for under $1K, both have 5" rear travel, and lend themselves well to my wants/needs.
I'm not one to have multiple bikes. Seems like infidelity to me..........
AngelGendy
03-09-11, 11:29 PM
I frequent the local shops but just to look for obscure parts. Some of the shops have older bikes and consignment bikes and I practically pushed over a few $5,000 bikes to look at an old $200 Puegot the other day...
We just purchased a rather expensive tandem ... because we wanted a tandem. :) We borrowed a tandem back in August to see if we would like it. We did, so we decided to buy one.
We buy new bicycles when a new bicycle appeals to us.
But then, for us a bicycle is not "the worlds most expensive diet", because although cycling is good for fitness, that's not the only reason we ride. And for us, a bicycle is not a transportation to the ice cream store ... unless that ice cream store is 50km or 100km or more away.
We like to cycle long distances to see places, to explore, for the adventure and challenge, and because we enjoy getting out there on our bicycles. And we enjoy nice bicycles. Similar to those who enjoy their yachts or horses.
That said, Rowan is also building up some tip finds. The more bicycles, the merrier. :D
Artkansas
03-10-11, 03:52 AM
A thief, a crash, a frame failure.
wahoonc
03-10-11, 04:55 AM
When the mood and the finances collide.
I am going to be buying a traveling bike in the next 6 months or so, most like going to be a Brompton P6R.
I buy bikes that I want when I want and could care less about the latest, greatest, and lightest that the consumption oriented bike market thinks I should buy. Face it, carbon frames are the ultimate in disposable bikes. :D I have an old steel frame that I crashed a few times racing back in the 70's, it could be taken apart, repaired, realigned and ridden again...and again. If it was good enough for Eddy it was good enough for me. ;)
Aaron :)
meanwhile
03-10-11, 07:59 AM
I'm looking at getting a Cyclocross bike when my personal economy improves. Looks to be a class of bike that suits my needs perfectly.
I can't say enough good things about this class of bike. The one issue with them is that some cantilever braked crossers suffer from noisy front brakes as shipped, but this is easily fixed with a $20 fork mounted hanger or, in the rare worst possible case of the squeals, a switch to v-brakes. But crossers will probably migrate to disc brakes anyway, so this will probably be a dead issue soon. Otherwise: good crossers are fast, versatile, good traffic bikes, good long distance bikes, and a complete blast on light singletrack, especially if you can squeeze in 40mm rubber and fit wide bars like Salsa Bell Laps for a little more leverage and steering ability. It can be worth buying two sets of wheels for fast rubber changes between on and off road.
A used Kona Jake is normally a very safe buy - especially once you spend the money on that brake hanger. Ask in the cross forum if you need advice.
A 50% off sale off a unique bike that you will use and I don't mean one of those fake sales where the retailers mark up the bike 200% first before plastering their website with 50% off.
fietsbob
03-10-11, 11:18 AM
a Bargain .. Just found one.
a Pre Owned Pocket Llama, Bike Friday.. built around a Rohloff Hub.
Steely Dan
03-10-11, 11:24 AM
What would entice you to buy a new bike?
more space.
i live in a tiny 500 SF highrise condo downtown and i already have 3 bikes (road bike, hybridized frankenbike, & a folding bike). i'd like to get a proper off-road machine and a simple single speed to complete my fleet, but i'm just simply out of room, unless i were to store my bikes out on my balcony, which i would never do.
When we get that velodrome built I'm going to need a track bike.
When the mood and the finances collide.
That's a good way of putting it. :)
I have a list of bicycles I want. Titanium was on that list ... so I have a titanium bicycle now. Tandem was on that list, and we are the proud owners of a tandem now. Recumbent is on that list ... but that probably won't happen for a little while yet for various reasons.
But it's like that with most things I purchase. I have a list of things I want ... and when the mood and finances collide, I get them.
cyccommute
03-10-11, 01:54 PM
If you are talking only about road bikes, your point of 'new and improved' is valid. There's really not too much that is 'new and improved' in tradition diamond frames. Mountain bikes, on the other hand, really do experience vast improvements with each model year. Shock and fork design change...and improve... at a very rapid rate. In dual suspension, the improvements and changes are even more dramatic. The mountain bike field is very much like the computer field...a 5 year old mountain bike is something of a dinosaur.
corkscrew
03-10-11, 02:17 PM
What would entice me to buy a new bike?
Winning the lottery.
I refuse to buy new bikes when used ones are available.
Nightshade
03-10-11, 04:15 PM
A thief, a crash, a frame failure.
Yep, that covers it for me too!
A thief, a crash, a frame failure.
To that I would add: unexpected windfall.
To that I would add: unexpected windfall.
+1, Someone giving me a pocketfull of cash. And then I'd probably spend it on new windows and keep riding my old stuff.
bkaapcke
03-10-11, 08:28 PM
A long wheelbase recumbent that weighs in the low 20's would get my wallet out. Not likely to happen, though. bk
furballi
03-10-11, 09:21 PM
FAR...free after rebate.
If you are talking only about road bikes, your point of 'new and improved' is valid. There's really not too much that is 'new and improved' in tradition diamond frames. Mountain bikes, on the other hand, really do experience vast improvements with each model year. Shock and fork design change...and improve... at a very rapid rate. In dual suspension, the improvements and changes are even more dramatic. The mountain bike field is very much like the computer field...a 5 year old mountain bike is something of a dinosaur.
Hi Stuart - thanks for the post - it does point out some major differences between road and mtb fields.
But actually I`m not a big roadie fan myself. I like to use bicycles (and cars and motorcycles) to DO things and go places. And I guess I actually prefer passive technology and field strippable components and builds for everything possible.
Most of my life my big thing has always been National Parks and skiing and I,ve probably hit every National Park in North America at least once on trips that spanned up to 5 weeks.
And unfortunately things wear out or need maintenaince and I hate being told: "Sorry! Thats special order!" or "Nope! That models been discontinued!"
Like you said - the technology is changing fast. The question is "What does that mean?" I`ve been skiing the same hills since I was seventeen and although the equipment available today is more expensive and incorporates more technology - the hills aren`t any bigger or any more challenging. Yeah - I own new equipment, but I also still have a pair of 30 year old carbon/wood/aluminum non-shaped skiis that I take out ocassionally just like some people drive classic cars on the weekend.
And since its the operator that counts - I can still ski all the double diamonds with them.
One of the few bicycles that actually intregues me a little is the Montague Paratrooper Pro. Unfortunately its really just the frame thats interesting and it isn`t sold seperately. That would be ideal for the bus and metro that would take people to any of the parks around the city of Montreal if they wanted to save an hour of commute on the bicycle trails. And being able to both fold and lock it would make locking it up anywhere a lot easier.
I can completely understand your facination with technology, I just don`t happen to share it. As a consumer I bought quality durable items everywhere and usually items that were expensive and well designed to the point they were out of reach of the average person. Most of those items are discontinued now and although everything is fully functional, parts would be impossible to get.
Sometimes CURRENT things can be a pain. Last year I ordered a dozen cross-drilled screws from the LBS to safety wire some Shimano brake components. Nothing special - they`re a stock item that I just wanted to have spares of and they`re listed in the Shimano IP catalogue. Six months later I`m still waiting.
So I`m convinced that often change is just for the sake of change and the chance to sell a new an even more expensive way to do exactly the same thing. North Americans seem to have a surplus of disposable income and everyone`s chasing it. The average person in China can`t afford the kind of bikes they`re manufacturing and exporting to us. There the most common bike still has rod accuated brake systems.
And that still works well enough for commuting or to go out for an ice-cream.
MichaelW
03-11-11, 08:00 AM
An old bike in need of new drivetain, a new bike with much improved spec (Shimano Alfine+dynamo hub), some spare cash.
cyccommute
03-11-11, 01:52 PM
Hi Stuart - thanks for the post - it does point out some major differences between road and mtb fields.
But actually I`m not a big roadie fan myself. I like to use bicycles (and cars and motorcycles) to DO things and go places. And I guess I actually prefer passive technology and field strippable components and builds for everything possible.
Most of my life my big thing has always been National Parks and skiing and I,ve probably hit every National Park in North America at least once on trips that spanned up to 5 weeks.
And unfortunately things wear out or need maintenaince and I hate being told: "Sorry! Thats special order!" or "Nope! That models been discontinued!"
Like you said - the technology is changing fast. The question is "What does that mean?" I`ve been skiing the same hills since I was seventeen and although the equipment available today is more expensive and incorporates more technology - the hills aren`t any bigger or any more challenging. Yeah - I own new equipment, but I also still have a pair of 30 year old carbon/wood/aluminum non-shaped skiis that I take out ocassionally just like some people drive classic cars on the weekend.
And since its the operator that counts - I can still ski all the double diamonds with them.
One of the few bicycles that actually intregues me a little is the Montague Paratrooper Pro. Unfortunately its really just the frame thats interesting and it isn`t sold seperately. That would be ideal for the bus and metro that would take people to any of the parks around the city of Montreal if they wanted to save an hour of commute on the bicycle trails. And being able to both fold and lock it would make locking it up anywhere a lot easier.
I can completely understand your facination with technology, I just don`t happen to share it. As a consumer I bought quality durable items everywhere and usually items that were expensive and well designed to the point they were out of reach of the average person. Most of those items are discontinued now and although everything is fully functional, parts would be impossible to get.
Sometimes CURRENT things can be a pain. Last year I ordered a dozen cross-drilled screws from the LBS to safety wire some Shimano brake components. Nothing special - they`re a stock item that I just wanted to have spares of and they`re listed in the Shimano IP catalogue. Six months later I`m still waiting.
So I`m convinced that often change is just for the sake of change and the chance to sell a new an even more expensive way to do exactly the same thing. North Americans seem to have a surplus of disposable income and everyone`s chasing it. The average person in China can`t afford the kind of bikes they`re manufacturing and exporting to us. There the most common bike still has rod accuated brake systems.
And that still works well enough for commuting or to go out for an ice-cream.
First let me say that I don't have that big of a fascination with technology...bike or otherwise. I don't own a carbon bike (for various reasons) but I do have bikes with carbon forks. I've very selective about the technology that I embrace. It really does have to be an improvement...in function as well as price...over previous technologies or I'll keep using the old stuff. I use index shifting over friction because it works so damned well. I use threadless headset over threaded because it works well and it's easier to adjust, maintain and repair. I use external bearing cranks for the same reason. I use a front fork because it gives better control while riding a mountain bike because the front wheel doesn't get trapped as easily as a rigid fork. I use dual suspension because it climbs better. That the ride is more comfortable with both is just an added benefit. I use an Ipod because it carries around 600 albums in the palm of my hand.
I don't embrace every thing that comes along quickly however. I'm not a fan of disc brakes. For most applications I don't see the point. A rim brake is just a disc brake with a larger rotor. On dual suspension bikes, discs are better because of the routing of cables and the extra motion of the rear triangle but I keep using rim brakes even on nondually mountain bikes because they work. I'm not a fan of carbon bikes mostly because of my weight. I'm not a fan of low spoke count wheels for the same reason.
I use some of my bikes for utility (4 of the seven) and others strictly for recreation. The utility bikes have been built, modified and upgraded for durability and ease of adjustment. My mountain bike...play bikes...have actually been modified the least because they aren't used in the same conditions as the other bikes. I really don't mind paying money for a product that works.
On my commuter bikes and, especially on my touring bike, I have tried to avoid too many Shimano items because Shimano is particularly bad at making things obsolete. Case in point, I have a Shimano 130mm XT hub (really old). I went to the shop to get a new bearing cone for it. The guy at the shop handed me the cone and I took it home. It didn't fit. It would thread on to the axle but it was very sloppy on the threads. I took it back...with the hub...and we were both dumbfounded to discover that the diameter of the axles had changed when the hubs when to 135mm. It was a small change...maybe a millimeter...but it was enough that the part wouldn't work. We found a cone that would work but I doubt that I could find one now...and the hub is still usable. A $2 part shouldn't cost $100 to replace (cost of new wheel)!
HowardBollixter
03-11-11, 06:42 PM
Maybe, just maybe, in the middle of some gnarly winter, dealing with squally squealing brakes and gritty rims, I might be tempted to buy a disc-brake set-up. Otherwise, the bikes I have now, including a couple of 20-year-olds, will do me for the duration. They work, they fit, they last.
Burton, Nice you added the humor part, this is the kind of thread that could bring out the polarized...new vs. old. :)
There are tons of new models at the LBS, none of which really interest me. I would probably like to have a fork lock out on my '96 MY mountain bike, but it doesn't hurt to not have that feature and I'd updated the front fork years ago. My road bikes presently date from 1980 to 1996 (newer ones have been sold off), all have been rebuilt at least once, one 4.5 times that I plan to bump it up from an 8S to a 9S and I'm rebuilding a '95 touring bike I recently bought.
I think the touring bike scratched a long standing itch for a downtown bomber/fire road rider/light touring bike. There are brand new bikes that could've easily done this, but none were 'calling' to me.
Not that I consider myself any wiser, but as I've aged the 'latest and greatest' doesn't have quite have the same appeal. ;)
Brad
big chainring
03-11-11, 09:40 PM
I really have no desire to buy anything new. I think the bikes in bike shops these days are just plain ugly.
I ride a 70's Gitane Grand Sport Deluxe. I cant imagine finding a new bike that would rival the nice smooth lively ride it has. And for something a little more sporty I have a '77 Schwinn Superior. Beautiful riding bike that just floats along.
When I see price tags of $3500 for new bikes, i just dont get it. A bike is a bike. Not much difference between my Gitane and a carbon fiber super bike when youre tooling around at 15-20 mph. I'm not a racer, just a biker.
Doug5150
03-11-11, 11:04 PM
It's highly unlikely I'll buy another bike anytime soon, other than if one of mine gets stolen or ruined somehow.
I've only got two bikes, but they cover my needs basically totally.
I had an idea for another bike I thought that I wanted to build--but it wouldn't do anything my other two won't already, and I really don't have much storage space for it anyway.
Neither of my current bikes is a off-road type.
The Surley Pugsley got me interested in MTB riding again, but I'd want even larger tires and 2WD, and nobody makes that.
Sixty Fiver
03-11-11, 11:39 PM
The only new bike that interests me is the surly Pugsley... since I can buy one at cost I will probably add one of these to the stable.
The only new bike that interests me is the surly Pugsley... since I can buy one at cost I will probably add one of these to the stable.
I'm coming to Canada around August. Make sure it's under lock and key, eh...
Sixty Fiver
03-12-11, 03:39 AM
I'm coming to Canada around August. Make sure it's under lock and key, eh...
I would say it is one bike I could not build but in truth, I could build a custom frame to handle those massive wheels. From a cost perspective being able to buy the bike at cost would be far cheaper and I could further modify the frame to suit my needs perfectly.
And I like Surly bikes... they are built rather well.
We get a lot of winter here... it would be a very practical vehicle that I could use year round as they are also great on the trails.
I'd probably sleep with it just in case any thieving Aussies came around.
:)
Well OK I guess I came up with the same thing that usually motivates me - simple curiousity!
That Pugsly had piqued my interest earlier and asking around - I can`t find anyone here thats even seen one let alone drive one. So that might be fun to play with just for the experience. The only real issue is gonna be that tires are gonna be special order for as long as I would own the bike. And I HATE special order stuff. Those extra Geax Tattoos that were backordered late last summer still haven`t shown up and those cross drilled brake bolts that were stock items on Shimano`s XTR hydraulic brakes in 2009 have supposedly been discontinued.
But another option is the Montague Paratrooper Pro that I was thinking about anyway. No exotic equipment but an interesting frame and good posibilities to convert to an ebike. I`ve been in touch with a company that imports them to Canada and will probably have one here bu June. Thats apparently another bike that no-one I know has even seen let alone test driven. Think I`ll have to see how much `fun factor` Montague built into that one.
rdtompki
03-20-11, 03:43 PM
When I retire in two years my retirement present to myself and my stoker/wife is going to be a CF tandem. We have a two-year old steel daVinci which we love, but the prospect of a few less pounds and (maybe) a better ride calls to me. Most of the accessories can be moved from the daVinci: CF waterbottle cages, cyclometers, etc.
cyclist2000
03-20-11, 06:00 PM
My daughter graduating college, that's when I will get a new bike and a new car and a trip somewhere and then retire.
Chris L
03-20-11, 09:58 PM
As someone earlier in the thread said, I buy a new bike when the bike(s) I have now need replacing. The last new bike I bought was my hybrid back in December 2007 (although the former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd was very kind in buying me a new MTB in 2009), and I'm in no hurry to replace it. I still have a really old MTB in my garage that I plan to re-invent as a single speed to use for shopping and so on, but that's about it.
I'm thinking at some point I might buy myself a touring bike and/or a cyclocross bike, but right now I'm in no hurry, and am more inclined to spend my money on airfares so I can ride the bikes I have now in more exotic places.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.