Singlespeed & Fixed Gear - Folding vs no folding tires

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




View Full Version : Folding vs no folding tires


dignandag
05-31-11, 04:11 PM
Just rcv'd some ribmos and didn't realized they were folding.

What's the difference that I need to be concerned with?

I don't care about weight and I'm not skidding.


calv
05-31-11, 04:14 PM
no differences other than they are lighter. some say they're easier to mount.

i think.

Scrodzilla
05-31-11, 04:19 PM
I find most folding tires to be a pain in the ass to mount and actually prefer steel beads.


Kayce
05-31-11, 04:22 PM
Folders are lighter and easier to carry. There isnt a major performance advantage to either one, other than the rotational weight which doesnt matter a whole lot on a road fixed gear.

dignandag
05-31-11, 04:22 PM
So, they fit just a securely as wire beaded tires?

cinemattic
05-31-11, 04:25 PM
yea, i'd like to know as well. i just picked up a maxis refuse tire that was folding, and i've only had wire beads. i'd imagine it'll be exactly the same to mount...

dignandag
05-31-11, 04:28 PM
I find most folding tires to be a pain in the ass to mount and actually prefer steel beads.

Without ever have used them, they look to be a pain to get on.

TejanoTrackie
05-31-11, 04:30 PM
So, they fit just a securely as wire beaded tires?

If they are good quality like the RiBMos, then yes. I have two sets of them as well as 2 sets of folding Pasela TGs, and they all mounted very easily and seated perfectly. If you've never mounted them before, the trick is to unfold them first and inflate a tube inside them off the rim so they take shape before attempting to mount them. Otherwise, they will fight you like a mad snake.

sjmartin
05-31-11, 04:39 PM
Folders are lighter and easier to carry. There isnt a major performance advantage to either one, other than the rotational weight which doesnt matter a whole lot on a road fixed gear.

Enlighten me as to why rotational weight doesn't matter on a fixed gear?

dignandag
05-31-11, 04:40 PM
Right on...thanks for the info.

Throwing them on tonight.

Scrodzilla
05-31-11, 04:56 PM
Enlighten me as to why rotational weight doesn't matter on a fixed gear?

Because how heavy your tires are isn't an issue when taking pics of your bike.

Kayce
05-31-11, 05:36 PM
I didnt say it didnt matter of a fixed gear, its by far the most important place to loose weight on any race bike(assuming similar aerodynamics, or in track bikes weight is usually more important than aero). But when it comes to riding around on the streets, weight isnt really an issue to be concerned about. After aesthetics, weight is the thing that gets the most time, energy, and money wasted on.

tFUnK
05-31-11, 05:41 PM
Steel bead: heavier, easier to mount (harder to pinch a tube when inflating, etc)
Folding bead: lighter, slightly more difficult to mount (easier to pinch a tube when inflating)

chenghiz
05-31-11, 06:42 PM
I didnt say it didnt matter of a fixed gear, its by far the most important place to loose weight on any race bike(assuming similar aerodynamics, or in track bikes weight is usually more important than aero). But when it comes to riding around on the streets, weight isnt really an issue to be concerned about. After aesthetics, weight is the thing that gets the most time, energy, and money wasted on.

Arguably rotational mass is most worthwhile to reduce for people who do a lot of acceleration and deceleration, e.g. riding in traffic (and not breaking traffic law).

Kayce
05-31-11, 08:26 PM
If you have two tires that are equally durable, puncture resistant, easy to mount, and cheap then definatly get the lighter one. But I think all of those factors are more important than tire weight for anything youre not racing.

Dannihilator
05-31-11, 09:03 PM
Just like with wire beads some kevlar beaded tires are easieur to mount on certain rims than others. Usually I can get folding tires on faster than wire beaded tires.

On the 930, I really don't care if they are folding or wire, but on the Bianchi... I'll take folding thank you very much or asap, tubulars.

jerknextdoor
06-01-11, 12:23 AM
I got my first folder the other week. put it on the first wheel i built myself. Wasn't sure what I did wrong but I couldn't get it on. Finally after about 15 minutes of frustration figured out the trick. So far I'm pretty happy with it. Definitely harder to mount than the wire bead on the same rim, both good quality tires. I'm pretty sure it was only difficult because I'd never dealt with one before.

Xgecko
06-01-11, 09:58 AM
I find most folding tires to be a pain in the ass to mount and actually prefer steel beads.

I'm glad to see that I'm not the only person who feels this way. I don't consider the weight savings worth the increased cost or hassle


Because how heavy your tires are isn't an issue when taking pics of your bike.


there is this too