Mountain Biking - 11-34 cassettes....shimano vs. Sram?

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
53-11 alltheway
11-29-04, 04:31 AM
I am here to ask a sincere question.....not to spam you..LOL
I noticed that shiamno and SRAM have totally diffferent ratios for there 11-34 cassettes.
Shimano 11-13-15-17-20-23-26-30-34
SRAM 11-12-14-16-18-21-24-28-34
SRAM most notably has 6 tooth gap at end of cassette 28-34....any problems with the shifting from 28 to 34? How good would you expect the 28 to 34 (or 34 to 28)shift be under load with XT rear derailleur?
P.S. I was reading about SRAM cassettes bending in the bigger cogs..possibly due to the 34 not having enough support. Any truth?
SRAM 9.0 cassettes any good or should I just stick with XT? What about the 7.0 cassettes....were they better?
Also what is the diffrence in quality between PG-950,970,990? Is the PG-990 worth it or should I just save my money and get a PG-950 or PG- 970?
Supposedly SRAM has changed their ratios for '05. I read something over at MTBR.com that showed a 30 to 34 tooth jump I believe. I prefer the 11-32 cassettes anyway.
I used the PG-990's THey are only $35 vs the $65-$70 for XT Cassettes so I don't feel like dropping to the PG-970 is much of a savings.
Trey
53-11 alltheway
11-29-04, 06:35 AM
Supposedly SRAM has changed their ratios for '05. I read something over at MTBR.com that showed a 30 to 34 tooth jump I believe. I prefer the 11-32 cassettes anyway.
I used the PG-990's THey are only $35 vs the $65-$70 for XT Cassettes so I don't feel like dropping to the PG-970 is much of a savings.
Trey
I was actually hoping the 28 to 34 jump worked OK. I don't think I'd mind a big gap at the end of the cassette....besides in the lowest gears 4 teeth doesn't really change the gear inches that much.
wonder squirrel
11-29-04, 06:38 AM
I am here to ask a sincere question.....not to spam you..LOL
I noticed that shiamno and SRAM have totally diffferent ratios for there 11-34 cassettes.
Shimano 11-13-15-17-20-23-26-30-34
SRAM 11-12-14-16-18-21-24-28-34
SRAM most notably has 6 tooth gap at end of cassette 28-34....any problems with the shifting from 28 to 34? How good would you expect the 28 to 34 (or 34 to 28)shift be under load with XT rear derailleur?
P.S. I was reading about SRAM cassettes bending in the bigger cogs..possibly due to the 34 not having enough support. Any truth?
SRAM 9.0 cassettes any good or should I just stick with XT? What about the 7.0 cassettes....were they better?
Also what is the diffrence in quality between PG-950,970,990? Is the PG-990 worth it or should I just save my money and get a PG-950 or PG- 970?
I have the PG-970 12-34T cassette with Deore derailer, I don't have problems shifting into the larger cog (although my upper pulley comes in slight contact to the largest cog). I don't shift under load though (heavy weight + muscle + BIG jump in shift = empty wallet after I'm done fixin' broken parts.
The only 11-34 SRAM PG-990 I have rideen worked fine. I had no issues going from 28 to 34 but there are plenty of others I have read about that have complaints about the jump.
phantomcow2
11-29-04, 06:59 AM
I also have had no issues with my 7.0 cassette, and x7 derailleur though. The SRAM cassettes are almost half the price of the Shimano anyways
Hi,
I don't think I saved all that much going to a Sram cassette.
I don't think it looks as nice, or shifts as nice. But it's ok.
When it wears out, I'll prob go back to Shimano.
catatonic
11-29-04, 08:59 AM
I was actually hoping the 28 to 34 jump worked OK. I don't think I'd mind a big gap at the end of the cassette....besides in the lowest gears 4 teeth doesn't really change the gear inches that much.
the 7-sp shimano "tourney" mega-range cassette has an even larger jump, and it works just fine for a while. Only thing allowing it to work so well is the deep ramps on that cog.
notfred
11-29-04, 10:01 AM
I have the 11-34 PG-990 cassette on my bike and it shifts just fine with my Sram x.9 derailleur.
53-11 alltheway
11-29-04, 10:13 AM
I don't shift under load though (heavy weight + muscle + BIG jump in shift = empty wallet after I'm done fixin' broken parts.
I love it!.....LOL....I can sense there is more testosterone in this forum compared to Road Forum. Don't get me started about the average Roadie's mannerisms....cuz, uhh....nevermind.
53-11 alltheway
11-29-04, 10:16 AM
the 7-sp shimano "tourney" mega-range cassette has an even larger jump, and it works just fine for a while. Only thing allowing it to work so well is the deep ramps on that cog.
there was a 7 speed freewheel 11-34.....it had a 24 to 34 jump for the last gear.....LOL.(10T diffference!!)...shifting the last gear must have been like shifting a chainring!
catatonic
11-29-04, 10:26 AM
yep, that's hte exact jump, 10t...except this was a 14-34.
The shift is far easier to deal with if you have a "rapid-rise" style deraileur, or low-normal as some call it. If you do, it's pretty much like shifting any other gear, but takes a little bit more time. I reccomend shifting in the center chainring if you do. If your on a MTB and are in the granny gear, it's going to be a very slow shift.
I use Shimano cassettes on both my bikes, one SRAM equiped the other XTR equipped.
When I had the X.9 cassette, I could feel the shift was not as crisp as with a Shiamno so I've kept using Shimano XT or higher cassettes.
11-32 ratio though
stapfam
11-30-04, 11:18 AM
Shimano 11-13-15-17-20-23-26-30-34
SRAM 11-12-14-16-18-21-24-28-34
SRAM most notably has 6 tooth gap at end of cassette 28-34....any problems with the shifting from 28 to 34? How good would you expect the 28 to 34 (or 34 to 28)shift be under load with XT rear derailleur?
P.S. I was reading about SRAM cassettes bending in the bigger cogs..possibly due to the 34 not having enough support. Any truth?
?
I have only used 11/32 on the solo, Shimano XT of course, and never have any problems. In fact I don't think there is even a necessity for the 32, with a 22t front sprocket. That lowest gear is only for when I have had enough and now want to rest for the final steep bit of the hill. To go to a 34t would not be necessary.
However, I also have a Mountain Tandem and we run a 24 t front sprocket, and do occasionally want a lower gear than a 32 on the rear. I bought a Shimano XT12/34 for this reason, but it now sits as a spare. We bent it first time out up the first hill. Don't know if the SRAM have a tendency to bend, but The Shimano did not stand up to it. Incidentally, this was a 5 arm spider on the cassette, and not the 4 arm that was prone to bending
Bobatin
11-30-04, 11:35 AM
I have had the SRAM and the Sh XT 11-32 I liked the SRAM better. I realy cant see a need for the 34 and have considered going to a 11-25. I cannot understand why 53-11 would need a 34 ;)
qmsdc15
11-30-04, 03:15 PM
I love it!.....LOL....I can sense there is more testosterone in this forum compared to Road Forum. Don't get me started about the average Roadie's mannerisms....cuz, uhh....nevermind.
Any left-over testosterone will leave your body the minute you ride a bike with a 34 tooth cog.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.