Winter Cycling - Steel vs Carbide
Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
12-13-04, 11:42 AM
I am currently in the market for my first pair of studded MTB tires. I intend to use these tires on my local xc trails which contain very few rocks. I am trying to decide between the Nokian Extremes ($150) and the Innova 268's ($75). Besides the big difference in price, the main difference in these tires as far as I can see is that the Nokian has carbide studs and the Innova has steel studs. Since I will be doing 99% of my riding on frozen dirt, snow and ice and only 1% on asphalt and rocks, can I get away with using the Innova's? Will a fresh set of Innova's work as well on frozen dirt, snow and ice as a fresh set of Nokians?
Check out the shapes of the studs. On Innova tires the stud is just one big block of steel (unless they've changed them since I bought mine), on Nokians the stud is shaped and has a sharp point. Thus, I would expect the Nokians to be the better tire. 2X better, I don't know.
How much ice is there on your trails? If it's just frozen dirt, even if it would be very wet if unfrozen, I doubt studs will be worth it, keeping in mind that studs offer no advantage in snow.
12-21-04, 10:47 PM
I rode on the pavement a little to get to the ice and snow the last four years. I wore out a set of steel studs in a set of IRC blizzard's in one season. This is season four for the Nokian 296's with carbide studs. Still about the same.
The IRC tires cost total about $60, gone in one year.
The Nokians were about $160 total, this is year four, $160 divided by four = $40 a year so far.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.