RWBlue01
07-06-12, 10:26 PM
How do I figure out what my optimal heart rate should be to burn calories?
Training & Nutrition - Optimal heart rate to burn calories
Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.View Full Version : Optimal heart rate to burn calories
AlbertaBeef
07-06-12, 11:36 PM
The most calories are burned at your maximum heart rate, period. The faster your heart rate, the more calories you burn. There is no question.
Obviously, however, you can't workout long at max... Many people can workout for an hour or more at 80-90% of their max though... the key is to find an effort you can sustain, and then sustain it.
BTW your maximum heart rate is, simply put, the maximum beats-per-minute your heart CAN beat. It cannot be calculated using the 220 minus your age method accurately, nor any other "formula". I'm nearly 50 years old with a maximum of 206bpm... In my 20's it was over 220... So we're all different. You can only determine your maximum by pushing yourself to it.
Obviously, however, you can't workout long at max... Many people can workout for an hour or more at 80-90% of their max though... the key is to find an effort you can sustain, and then sustain it.
BTW your maximum heart rate is, simply put, the maximum beats-per-minute your heart CAN beat. It cannot be calculated using the 220 minus your age method accurately, nor any other "formula". I'm nearly 50 years old with a maximum of 206bpm... In my 20's it was over 220... So we're all different. You can only determine your maximum by pushing yourself to it.
gregf83
07-06-12, 11:43 PM
The highest one you can sustain for the duration of time you have to exercise. If you have 5 hrs it will be different than if you only have an hour.
chasm54
07-07-12, 01:03 AM
The highest one you can sustain for the duration of time you have to exercise. If you have 5 hrs it will be different than if you only have an hour.
Yes. But if the question were "how should I ride to lose weight?" the answer would be slightly different. It's easier to manage one's post-ride appetite after a longer session at a steady pace than after a shorter, intense workout that burns similar numbers of calories. In my experience, anyway.
Yes. But if the question were "how should I ride to lose weight?" the answer would be slightly different. It's easier to manage one's post-ride appetite after a longer session at a steady pace than after a shorter, intense workout that burns similar numbers of calories. In my experience, anyway.
gregf83
07-07-12, 09:24 AM
^^ Agreed but I didn't see the question posed that way. Long rides work best for losing weight but you need to have the time. You also still need to control your intake as there is no shortage of long distance fat cyclists.
chasm54
07-07-12, 09:43 AM
^^ Agreed but I didn't see the question posed that way. Long rides work best for losing weight but you need to have the time. You also still need to control your intake as there is no shortage of long distance fat cyclists.
Don't I know it. LOL. The thing about cycling is, it can be like running or it can be like walking. Fat cyclists are the walkers.
Don't I know it. LOL. The thing about cycling is, it can be like running or it can be like walking. Fat cyclists are the walkers.
Mithrandir
07-07-12, 09:52 AM
I've actually been having a little luck losing weight now that I've started regularly attacking hills instead of flats.
Long flat rides never seemed to do anything for my weight, but made me so ravenous that I actually gained weight.
Long flat rides never seemed to do anything for my weight, but made me so ravenous that I actually gained weight.