Bizikleto
Hi there,
Does anyone know why tyre sizes do not conform to standard actual sizes? I'm always deceived when I get a new tyre, measure it and the gauge always yields a 2-4-mm-downsized figure! :mad: compared to the tyre sidewall label (this usually is true for high-end tyres). The thing can happen the other way round when you get fatter than labelled tyres (usually in low-range ones). It can't be lack of manufacturing precision, because in case of car tyres, what you buy is what you looked for in terms of profiles, widths and so on. This is an issue when bying tyres on the Internet for example, because you don't know the actual size until you have it clinched and inflated on your rim.
It doesn't seem to be a concern to cyclists in general and cx-ers in particular. If this starting point is not met, there's no way of making manufacturers do a serious job.
Ride the trails anyway.
Does anyone know why tyre sizes do not conform to standard actual sizes? I'm always deceived when I get a new tyre, measure it and the gauge always yields a 2-4-mm-downsized figure! :mad: compared to the tyre sidewall label (this usually is true for high-end tyres). The thing can happen the other way round when you get fatter than labelled tyres (usually in low-range ones). It can't be lack of manufacturing precision, because in case of car tyres, what you buy is what you looked for in terms of profiles, widths and so on. This is an issue when bying tyres on the Internet for example, because you don't know the actual size until you have it clinched and inflated on your rim.
It doesn't seem to be a concern to cyclists in general and cx-ers in particular. If this starting point is not met, there's no way of making manufacturers do a serious job.
Ride the trails anyway.