what are the advantages?
I'm thinking of building a tadpole recumbent and was wondering on which drive type would be better.
This is an archived thread, you can find the full version of this thread, with images, links and more content
here.
Ready to buy? Check out these two online bike stores:
-
http://www.nashbar.com (you can find the latest bike nashbar coupons in
this thread)
-
http://www.performancebike.com (you can find the latest performance bike coupons in
this thread)
Cya on the forums,
- The BikeForums Team
-
http://www.bikeforums.net
I only know of one FWD tadpole trike commercially available, and that's the one by A.S Engineering (http://www.aha.ru/~ykpro/index.htm) . The reason is mechanical simplicity and drivetrain efficiency. By necessity, the ASE trike is shaft drive, and putting power to the steered, driven wheels causes more loss than a chain setup going to the rear wheel. Still, I've always been impressed with the ASE trike - it looks cool, and efficiency be d*mned but the shaft drive has a super-high zoot factor! (YMMV.)
come on folks - you must have some preference whether it's based on efficiency or personal taste.
Copyright 1999 - 2007
BikeForums.Net - All rights reserved.
Common bike forum topics in clue bicycles, cycling, mountain biking,
cycling jerseys, shorts, socks, shoes and bike equiptment selection.