shorter crank arms
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
shorter crank arms
I am a male aged 67 and had knee replacement 2 years ago and never recovered complete bending motion. About a month ago began riding my hybrid again and am experiencing some pain at the top of my pedal stroke(maximum knee bend). I have 175mm crank arms and was wondering if changing to 170mm cranks would help, what do y'all think.
#2
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
Sure. I would make sure that you have proper leg extension at the bottom of the pedal stroke first. The usual rule of thumb is that your legs should completely straighten when riding with your heels on the pedals. If your saddle is too low, that will exacerbate the issue of your knee bending too much at the top. Hope this helps.
#4
Senior Member
Depending on your height, maybe try 165s. 5mm is noticeable but not dramatic--a 10mm change will give you a better picture if shorter cranks is helpful for you.
#5
Senior Member
This might help. How to Fit a Bicycle
#6
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,786
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
If the problem with your knee is limited range of motion, shorter crank arms will help. 175mm arms are really quite long for anyone unless you're over 6' tall. I'd go with 165mm or even shorter.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Agreed. My bikes have cranks of 175, 170, and 165mm and I hardly notice any change at all switching between the 175mm and 170mm. The 165s feel a little different, but not dramatically so. I'd recommend changing to at least 10mm shorter to experience a significant change in the range of motion.
#8
commu*ist spy
+1 on check seat position first. but a shorter crank (170) will help with knee bend, your leg will be 1 cm further from your chest at the 12 o'clock, which might help
#9
Really Old Senior Member
I have a limited range of motion in one knee and 165mm cranks were a savior!
175mm 60 RPM
170mm 80 RPM
165mm 85 RPM
160mm 80 RPM
Believe me- 5MM CAN be very noticeable!
175mm 60 RPM
170mm 80 RPM
165mm 85 RPM
160mm 80 RPM
Believe me- 5MM CAN be very noticeable!
#10
Banned
I'm 67 ,too. (FWIW) have 1_180, and several 175 & 170... not a speed/performance ambitious guy , I just pick a confortable Gear .
saddle to pedal spindle height is relatively consistant .. a bit higher with the shorter, and lower with the longer crank-arm. but equal in total.
saddle to pedal spindle height is relatively consistant .. a bit higher with the shorter, and lower with the longer crank-arm. but equal in total.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: La La Land (We love it!)
Posts: 6,301
Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 273 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
I am a male aged 67 and had knee replacement 2 years ago and never recovered complete bending motion. About a month ago began riding my hybrid again and am experiencing some pain at the top of my pedal stroke(maximum knee bend). I have 175mm crank arms and was wondering if changing to 170mm cranks would help, what do y'all think.
This sounds too serious to just toss out to a bike forum for random opinions...
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Japan
Posts: 128
Bikes: Pinarello Razha 2015, Trek FX 7.4 WSD 2015
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Not an expert but I would recommend trying out at least 165 mm cranks for people with range of motion issues. I am a very short rider who tried out shortened custom cranks (153 mm) and they made a big difference to my comfort and performance vs. 170 mm. They're just so much easier to spin. The difference was very noticeable especially when climbing.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Very N and Very W Ohio Williams Co.
Posts: 2,458
Bikes: 2001 Trek Multitrack 7200, 2104 Fuji Sportif 1.5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Could be Q factor is part of it too ? Somebody here said most bikes are actually built for a narrower person across the hips than the average American. If I recall right he said speedplay has a correction system that was a great help for him. Pedal washers can help some but this sounded like a series of different axles for the pedals to correct Q factor.
Bill
Bill
#18
Hello
Keep your knees straight (don't side load the joint, it reduces ball and socket contact area, concentrating force).
Be a spinner and use less pressure per stroke (keep pressure down).
Take it real easy and warm the joint up slowly. It takes me about 3 miles before I am ready to put my max effort.
I must manage my knees. If I over do it I inflame the joint. Then its NSAID after dinner.
YMMV
Be a spinner and use less pressure per stroke (keep pressure down).
Take it real easy and warm the joint up slowly. It takes me about 3 miles before I am ready to put my max effort.
I must manage my knees. If I over do it I inflame the joint. Then its NSAID after dinner.
YMMV
#19
Senior Member
I am a male aged 67 and had knee replacement 2 years ago and never recovered complete bending motion. About a month ago began riding my hybrid again and am experiencing some pain at the top of my pedal stroke(maximum knee bend). I have 175mm crank arms and was wondering if changing to 170mm cranks would help, what do y'all think.
Ditto. How did it go for you?
This is my situation as well: https://www.bikeforums.net/fifty-plus...l#post17835324
I am looking forward to having my new machine shortly... perhaps tomorrow.
Cheers!
#20
Senior Member
My ride came in. 165mm cranks are not bad at all when that's all you can turn over. But, it does make for a tad taller seat height.
https://www.bikeforums.net/fifty-plus...l#post17850950
This is my first aluminum road bike and it's pretty well thought out. Reviews of earlier years were positive. With the 2015 Z85 Felt switched to 105 components so I lucked out there. I'm looking forward to learning how to use aerobars.
https://www.bikeforums.net/fifty-plus...l#post17850950
This is my first aluminum road bike and it's pretty well thought out. Reviews of earlier years were positive. With the 2015 Z85 Felt switched to 105 components so I lucked out there. I'm looking forward to learning how to use aerobars.
#21
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 42
Bikes: '85 Bridgestone 400
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#22
Senior Member
Could be Q factor is part of it too ? Somebody here said most bikes are actually built for a narrower person across the hips than the average American. If I recall right he said speedplay has a correction system that was a great help for him. Pedal washers can help some but this sounded like a series of different axles for the pedals to correct Q factor.
Bill
Bill
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Very N and Very W Ohio Williams Co.
Posts: 2,458
Bikes: 2001 Trek Multitrack 7200, 2104 Fuji Sportif 1.5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
As it turns out, putting in nearly 2 years on a recumbent exercise bike introduces the Q-factor by a matter of inches not mm when transitioning to a road bike. I am switching out the clunky pedals on the trainer with a pair of MTB pedals to reduce the width between the pedals. My plan is to meet in the middle by also using Zero-axle Tioga pedals on the Z85 to widen things up a bit.
Bill
#24
Senior Member
Definitely an effective way of increasing the Q factor:
That big sealed bearing adds a bit of weight: Tioga's Zero-axle peddles are a bit heavier than I expected. However, they are very well built.
This seem to me to be a very good design idea. Perhaps Tioga should consider extending the Zero-axle line to accommodate clips and for use as clip-ins. Otherwise, if I ever transition back to clipless, Speedplay seems to be the only Q factor savvy peddle.
That big sealed bearing adds a bit of weight: Tioga's Zero-axle peddles are a bit heavier than I expected. However, they are very well built.
This seem to me to be a very good design idea. Perhaps Tioga should consider extending the Zero-axle line to accommodate clips and for use as clip-ins. Otherwise, if I ever transition back to clipless, Speedplay seems to be the only Q factor savvy peddle.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ninagb
Adaptive Cycling: Handcycles, Amputee Adaptation, Visual Impairment, and Other Needs
11
07-24-17 02:10 PM
Flounce
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling
10
03-11-17 09:01 PM