Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Formerly Known as Newbie Juha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    5,854
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reduced spoke count wheels

    I'm tentatively looking for a new bike for commuting and very light touring. The bike will have a light rear rack for small loads in panniers. It will mostly be ridden on paved roads, but the pavement is not always anywhere near smooth. The three models I have been eyeballing all have fewer spokes (e.g. 28) than the hybrids I currently ride (32). I have my doubts about durability etc as I have had occasional bad spells with 32-spoke wheels, sometimes snapping several spokes in a short period of time.

    The LBS guys all say spoke count does not matter much, they are pretty much the same, they have had zero complaints from customers etc. However, they also say other things that I (based on experience) disagree with. So please give me your 0,02€:

    All other things being equal, is a lower spoke count wheel weaker than a 32-spoke wheel? Is the difference even remotely significant in real life?
    If I break a spoke, will a lower spoke count wheel be more difficult for me to true?

    I have not built wheels from scratch, but I can replace a broken spoke and true a wheel.

    --J
    To err is human. To moo is bovine.

    Who is this General Failure anyway, and why is he reading my drive?


    Become a Registered Member in Bike Forums
    Community guidelines

  2. #2
    Senior Member Surferbruce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Los Angeles/Aveyron France
    Posts
    5,308
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    a 28h is fine. commonly lower spoke count wheels have stiffer heavier rims. i have a 16 spoke wheel on my cross bike and while it's doing fine i wish it was a higher spoke count lower weight rim.

  3. #3
    Listen to me powers2b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Lexus Texas
    Posts
    2,791
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would choose higher spoke count wheels for loaded touring.

    Enjoy

  4. #4
    Senior Member Retro Grouch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    St Peters, Missouri
    My Bikes
    Rans Enduro Sport, Hase Kettweisel Tandem, Merin Bear Valley beater bike
    Posts
    23,975
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If low spoke count wheels weren't pretty reliable, you'd be reading tons of posts ragging on them.

    Low spoke count wheels are a little bit tricker to keep true.

    What do you do if you break a spoke on the road? With a 32 spoke wheel you can usually bend the broken spoke out of the way, open the quick release on your brake and proceed on your way. You probably won't be able to get your brake pads far enough apart to handle the amount of wobble caused by one broken spoke on a low spoke count wheel.

  5. #5
    la vache fantôme phantomcow2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    NH
    Posts
    6,266
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I dislike low spoke count wheels. First of all breaking a spoke causes more serious problems as Retro grouch mentioned.
    There is no advantage worth mentioning if you ask me. Some say its weight savings, well to make up for so few spokes you require heavier rims and we know weight farther from hub is noticed more so your at a loss there again. They require beefier spokes too. I would just go with 32.
    C://dos
    C://dos.run
    run.dos.run

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    311
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you add up the weights of low spoke count wheels vs. say a 32 spoke, the difference is actually less than 100 grams, or about 4 oz. For commuting and light touring, I'd go with the 32 or 28 spoke wheel.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Cental New Jersey
    My Bikes
    Klein Quantum Pro
    Posts
    469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For your purposes (small loads on the bike), I'd go with 32 spokes. This distributes loads over more spokes.
    If you are breaking spokes, your overall spoke tension on the wheel is probably low or the wheel is fairly old and needs to be relaced.
    The lower the spoke count, the further the wheel will come out of true when a spoke breaks because each spoke is holding more of the wheels overall tension.

  8. #8
    if x=byh then x+1=byn blandin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    My Bikes
    See signature
    Posts
    3,443
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    32 spooke wheels can be strong and light. My custom built Velocity Aeroheads from Mike Garcia weigh 1477 grams without the skewers. They're strong, light and don't need to be trued every other ride.

  9. #9
    feros ferio John E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
    My Bikes
    1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
    Posts
    15,256
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I use 32- and 36-spoke wheels exclusively. The ONLY benefit of reduced-spoke wheels is a minor reduction in wind turbulence/drag, but the disadvantages are very significant for all of us non-racers. One cannot fight with basic physics/engineering: the easiest way to design a wheel with a higher strength/weight ratio is to increase the spoke count.
    "Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
    Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
    Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
    Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
    Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

  10. #10
    Get the stick. darkmother's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    My Bikes
    12 Y.O. Litespeed MTB, IRO Jamie Roy fixie, Custom Habanero Ti 'Cross, No name SS MTB, Old school lugged steel track bike (soon)
    Posts
    1,544
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Personally, I would not use low spoke count wheels on any bike I use for transportation. There are a few reasons for this:

    With low spoke count wheels, the tension in each individual spoke has to be proportionally higher to achieve any reliability. If (when) you do break a spoke, it will go much farther out of true, sometimes to the point where you have to walk home. That will not happen with 32 spoke wheels.

    If (when) you break a spoke, or even when your wheel goes out of true, repair or truing is more difficult, if not impossible because the spoke required spoke tension is too high. Many of these wheels are built using a jig which deflects the rim in order allow each spoke to be tightened without stripping the spoke nipple. Again, not practical.

    Finally, asside from looking cool, these wheels offer no advantage. In order to be strong, they must use a heavier rim, which tends to offset any gain realized by fewer spokes. I'd stick with a nice, handbuilt pair of 32 or 36 hole wheels.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •