Carbon crank question
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Indiana
Posts: 353
Bikes: '84 Paramount, '89 Schwinn 754, '13 Specialized RockHopper, Trek Domane 4.3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
3 Posts
Carbon crank question
This is a time critical question (supposed to meet the guy today) but wondering what potential issues I might be getting into by buying a used FSA SL-K carbon crankset (standard gear set, 175mm). Not sure what the interface is but BB is included and looks like it will work on my bike (standard English threaded) but I will have the bike with me so we can actually check it. It would be replacing an Ultegra 6600 crankset for now (I may end up using it on another build later).
Last edited by bres dad; 07-13-15 at 12:18 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
226 Posts
This is a time critical question (supposed to meet the guy today) but wondering what potential issues I might be getting into by buying a used FSA SL-K carbon crankset (standard gear set, 175mm). Not sure what the interface is but BB is included and looks like it will work on my bike (standard English threaded). It would be replacing an Ultegra 6600 crankset for now (I may end up using it on another build later).
FSA rings don't shift up instantly as often as Shimano and Campagnolo.
The FSA SL-K has solid carbon fiber crank-arms which give up about 100 g rams to the SL-K Light crank.
The SL-K and SL-K Light Mega Exo cranks take different bottom brackets, with the hollow crank arms requiring a thinner NDS bearing. Make sure you get the right one.
There's also the BB386EVO SLK Light with a 30mm aluminum spindle which weighs less and takes a different bottom bracket.
Last edited by Drew Eckhardt; 07-13-15 at 12:22 PM.
#3
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Indiana
Posts: 353
Bikes: '84 Paramount, '89 Schwinn 754, '13 Specialized RockHopper, Trek Domane 4.3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
3 Posts
I don't believe this is the SL-K light. Only SL-K is specified in the ad and the photo doesn't appear to say 'Light' anywhere, if it even would. Assuming its not the Light, how much of a risk would the arms cracking be? Where I mostly ride tends to be fairly flat. I'm also not one to mash the pedals with the force of a hydraulic press.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18378 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
I think some of the FSA cranks suffered a problem with the NDS arm becoming loose. So, once the holding bolt is tightened down, if it is still loose, then just walk away from the crankset.
#5
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Indiana
Posts: 353
Bikes: '84 Paramount, '89 Schwinn 754, '13 Specialized RockHopper, Trek Domane 4.3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
3 Posts
So I met up with the guy and looked at the crankset. There's more wear on it than I expected (a little gouging but not deep) and it needs cleaned up but itthe NDS is nice and tight. Also fit perfectly into the existing bottom bracket. We're good to go...