Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

shimano 105 FD rub due to big chainring

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

shimano 105 FD rub due to big chainring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-15, 03:58 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 125
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
shimano 105 FD rub due to big chainring

I have a bike with Shimano 105 compact crankset and the big chainring seems to be out of true only in one spot. It moves out of true maybe 1mm but with an 11 speed system, theres very little room for even 1mm of movement. Otherwise, it'll rub the FD when cross chained (big chain ring, large cog or smallest cog). I have STI shifters with trim shifting or whatever it is called and have adjusted for that already. The smaller chainring doesnt have issues.

I brought the bike back to the LBS I purchased the bike from and they said could not replicate issue. I got the opinion of another LBS who detected the issue but said it's not out of "tolerance". They said the new Shimano chain rings are hard to true since theyre so stiff. Only choice is to replace them it'd be an entire crankset, not just chainring.

Any of you have experience with this? Should I call Shimano? Should I source the big chainring online and replace it?

I get by for now by not crossing chain but more times than not, I can't help but be cross chained to keep my cadence and rhythm steady. TIA!
truflip is offline  
Old 08-04-15, 04:38 PM
  #2  
Mechanic/Tourist
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 7,522

Bikes: 2008 Novara Randonee - love it. Previous bikes:Motobecane Mirage, 1972 Moto Grand Jubilee (my fave), Jackson Rake 16, 1983 C'dale ST500.

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 486 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times in 11 Posts
It is not necessarily the chainring itself. the large chainring will show more deflection due to its diameter. Make sure first that it is only the large chainring. Rotate the chainrings without the chain mounted and with something as a reference point over the next smallest chainring. If it varies at the same point, and does not vary anywhere else than the problem is the spider being out of true. Within tolerance is of course a matter of opinion. It's simply not true that you would have to replace the entire crankset. Please confirm 1st whether it's the chainring or the spider.
cny-bikeman is offline  
Old 08-04-15, 06:40 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 241
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by truflip
It moves out of true maybe 1mm
1mm? You could grab practically any new bike off a showroom floor and the big ring will have a slight runout on true.

I have the same crank as you - 5800 (53/39) - and my big ring wasn't perfect either. I didnt measure, but I'd guess maybe 1mm of variation to either extreme. That said, 1mm shouldn't be enough to cause issue.

Originally Posted by truflip
it'll rub the FD when cross chained
Well, you shouldn't run crosschain to begin with, but that's another issue.

If you are getting rub, even with trimming the front derailleur, your front derailleur probably isn't setup as good as it could be (shops tend to be in a rush and aren't always perfectionists).

The reason the shop can't replicate it is because there's no force on a bike stand to flex the rings/crank, as if someone was riding it.

There are some resources online that may help you determine if the setup of your FD is correct, or you could always get a second opinion/adjustment from someone you think is more competent.
Jamminatrix is offline  
Old 08-04-15, 08:05 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,082

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4204 Post(s)
Liked 3,862 Times in 2,310 Posts
At one time in the 1990s Shimano included an instructional page with new bikes which stated that rub on the rings by the chain wasn't a wrong thing. It pictured the cog/ring combos where rub was to be tolerated. Andy.
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Old 08-04-15, 09:51 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
oldbobcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,396

Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 514 Post(s)
Liked 448 Times in 337 Posts
I've seen that on new 105 cranks. The manufacturing tolerances on the rings are definitely looser than on Ultegra, but I haven't met one yet that I couldn't tune properly. That means no rub at all on the big ring using cogs 2 or 3 through 11 in back, and trim for 1 and maybe 2.

By the way, low trim is lower than default low with 11-speed fronts. After you drop to the inner ring, there's one more click to eliminate rub when you're using cogs 1 and 2. I've known some shop mechanics to be unfamiliar with this. I'd see what another shop can do.
oldbobcat is offline  
Old 08-12-15, 11:43 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 125
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cny-bikeman
It is not necessarily the chainring itself. the large chainring will show more deflection due to its diameter. Make sure first that it is only the large chainring. Rotate the chainrings without the chain mounted and with something as a reference point over the next smallest chainring. If it varies at the same point, and does not vary anywhere else than the problem is the spider being out of true. Within tolerance is of course a matter of opinion. It's simply not true that you would have to replace the entire crankset. Please confirm 1st whether it's the chainring or the spider.
i assumed it's the big chainring since the part that portrudes is in between two of the widest part of the BCD. Opposite end of the crank arm to be exact. It comes out like sine wave so to speak only at that section.
Originally Posted by Jamminatrix
1mm? You could grab practically any new bike off a showroom floor and the big ring will have a slight runout on true.

I have the same crank as you - 5800 (53/39) - and my big ring wasn't perfect either. I didnt measure, but I'd guess maybe 1mm of variation to either extreme. That said, 1mm shouldn't be enough to cause issue.


Well, you shouldn't run crosschain to begin with, but that's another issue.

If you are getting rub, even with trimming the front derailleur, your front derailleur probably isn't setup as good as it could be (shops tend to be in a rush and aren't always perfectionists).

The reason the shop can't replicate it is because there's no force on a bike stand to flex the rings/crank, as if someone was riding it.

There are some resources online that may help you determine if the setup of your FD is correct, or you could always get a second opinion/adjustment from someone you think is more competent.
Yea, i did that... went to shops, checked out the bikes and of the close to a dozen bikes I checked, mix of FSA Gossamer Pro and Shimano 105, they were straight.

1mm may not be much but on an 11 speed, tolerances seem to be so tight.

I've resolved the issue I think but I will try not to ride cross-chained still.
Originally Posted by oldbobcat
I've seen that on new 105 cranks. The manufacturing tolerances on the rings are definitely looser than on Ultegra, but I haven't met one yet that I couldn't tune properly. That means no rub at all on the big ring using cogs 2 or 3 through 11 in back, and trim for 1 and maybe 2.

By the way, low trim is lower than default low with 11-speed fronts. After you drop to the inner ring, there's one more click to eliminate rub when you're using cogs 1 and 2. I've known some shop mechanics to be unfamiliar with this. I'd see what another shop can do.
BINGO! If anyone is searching this thread having a similar issue or just having chain rub in general, check the shimano dealer manuals. There's a note in there that says line up the outer edge of the FD cage and the teeth of the chain ring WITHOUT tension on the cable. To do this you tighten the low limit screw which pushes the FD outward. Once you have that set, you attach the shift cable. What this does is give proper tension which allows the L trim and T trim on the shifter to work better. My issue was whoever assembled the bike did not seem to do this step. They simply attached the shift cable as tight as possible in the small chain ring setting. This cause the travel for the T trim to be very small thus not clearing the chain.

They also routed the cable wrong on the FD. it was on the right of the converted pin. It's supposed to be on the left side of it. Why the shop didnt notice this just means they're likely unfamiliar, didnt care enough or just plain lazy. Irks me...

Last edited by truflip; 08-12-15 at 11:47 AM.
truflip is offline  
Old 08-12-15, 08:33 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
oldbobcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,396

Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 514 Post(s)
Liked 448 Times in 337 Posts
Originally Posted by truflip

BINGO!
Finally got one right on this forum. Thanks for the feedback, flip.

Setting up Shimano 11-speed road is a bit of a mind shift. A lot of experienced mechanics haven't bothered to read the manuals (or take the Shimano online training), and a lot of experienced mechanics can't be bothered to, either.
oldbobcat is offline  
Old 08-12-15, 08:47 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,082

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4204 Post(s)
Liked 3,862 Times in 2,310 Posts
Originally Posted by oldbobcat
Finally got one right on this forum. Thanks for the feedback, flip.

Setting up Shimano 11-speed road is a bit of a mind shift. A lot of experienced mechanics haven't bothered to read the manuals (or take the Shimano online training), and a lot of experienced mechanics can't be bothered to, either.
We've seen a number of 11 speed road bikes (Shimano equipped) with the ft der's bracing screw not fully set against the additional pressure plate, or just run into the carbon frame surface. We do mention this to both the customer and the Trek rep. Some one needs to know that the new stuff isn't being set up correctly by some shops. Andy.
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Old 08-13-15, 08:40 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 125
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by oldbobcat
Finally got one right on this forum. Thanks for the feedback, flip.

Setting up Shimano 11-speed road is a bit of a mind shift. A lot of experienced mechanics haven't bothered to read the manuals (or take the Shimano online training), and a lot of experienced mechanics can't be bothered to, either.
My pleasure! thank you for sending my in the right direction. It's my first road bike so I had no preconceptions on how these FD's work mechanically so it was easy to just simply read the manual and redo the install. I guess I'll be doing my own tune up/repairs if most mechanics can't be bothered to update themselves.
Originally Posted by Andrew R Stewart
We've seen a number of 11 speed road bikes (Shimano equipped) with the ft der's bracing screw not fully set against the additional pressure plate, or just run into the carbon frame surface. We do mention this to both the customer and the Trek rep. Some one needs to know that the new stuff isn't being set up correctly by some shops. Andy.
Do you mean the braze on FD's? I have a band type FD on a CF frame and there are no additional pressure plates nor was it mentioned in the manual. It was mentioned for braze on types though.
truflip is offline  
Old 08-13-15, 07:02 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,082

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4204 Post(s)
Liked 3,862 Times in 2,310 Posts
truflip- Yes. the bracing screw and pressure plate are on the "braze on" (or rivet and glue ons) mounts that we have only seen. All have been on plastic frames.

I can fully understand why Shimano has added this extra feature as soooo many "braze ons" (on carbon frames) are very flexible. Even with the more common ft ders in years prior the non clamping band mounting is quite flexible. Just one more example of the how changing materials and their application without changing component designs can be a bad choice. Andy.
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Old 08-13-15, 07:08 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
oldbobcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,396

Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 514 Post(s)
Liked 448 Times in 337 Posts
Originally Posted by Andrew R Stewart
I can fully understand why Shimano has added this extra feature as soooo many "braze ons" (on carbon frames) are very flexible. Even with the more common ft ders in years prior the non clamping band mounting is quite flexible. Just one more example of the how changing materials and their application without changing component designs can be a bad choice. Andy.
Which is worse, ignoring the bracing screw completely or grinding it into the frame? I vote for grinding it into the frame.

Hear, hear, about flexible front derailleur tabs. Well, maybe not the tab so much as the part of the frame it attaches to. I was working on a newer Kestrel this week, that generally shifts pretty badly. The in-frame cable routing is pretty bad and you can watch the front tab flap when pulling up to the big ring. The tab's stiff, but the seat tube behind it isn't.
oldbobcat is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ronin4740
Bicycle Mechanics
8
07-05-19 12:21 PM
ScottChapman
Road Cycling
5
10-21-18 04:55 AM
JiveTurkey
Bicycle Mechanics
7
02-14-12 01:50 PM
krokumr
Bicycle Mechanics
12
11-29-10 02:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.