Leak detection with latex tubes
#1
just another gosling
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,501
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3873 Post(s)
Liked 1,920 Times
in
1,369 Posts
Leak detection with latex tubes
I tried Michelin latex tubes and liked them. Better road feel and maybe a little faster. I also thought that they were a little harder/slower to flat. I don't care that they lose a little air overnight. However I had a couple of slowish leaks with them. I popped in a new tube, but when I got home and went to patch them, I couldn't find the leak, even in the sink. If I inflated them like I would a butyl tube to like 1.5", they blew a balloon on one spot, probably weakening the tube. So I couldn't find the leak. Impossible to see on inspection, and I couldn't add enough pressure to blow bubbles.
These are much too expensive to toss after a flat. I usually limit butyl tubes to 6 patches. Anyone with experience?
These are much too expensive to toss after a flat. I usually limit butyl tubes to 6 patches. Anyone with experience?
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Somewhere in TX
Posts: 2,266
Bikes: BH, Cervelo, Cube, Canyon
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 212 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
I would put it back in the tire, squirt some sealant into it, and inflate to 50 psi. If it hold that then go to 70 psi. Then to whatever your riding pressure is.
But yeah, if you give them more than a few psi while in the sink it will herniate.
But yeah, if you give them more than a few psi while in the sink it will herniate.
#3
just another gosling
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,501
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3873 Post(s)
Liked 1,920 Times
in
1,369 Posts
110 psi. OK? I'm not a sealant guy. Which sealant?
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Somewhere in TX
Posts: 2,266
Bikes: BH, Cervelo, Cube, Canyon
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 212 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
Either the Bontrager or Orange seal. Both sealed every puncture in a latex tube in the slowtwitch.com test.
#5
Senior Member
Umm, wouldn't the weight of the sealant increase the weight of the tube? Why not go with butyl and not have to add sealant; save the latex for race days.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,651
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 835 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
741 Posts
Sometimes those hard to find leaks are at the base of the valve stem and the stem needs to be wiggled around under water to expose the leak. But yes, latex are a little harder to find a leak than butyl. You could also try pumping up the tire mounted on the rim and dunk it in water with 100psi or so and you may at least find the general area where the leak is.
#8
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,569
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1102 Post(s)
Liked 2,136 Times
in
1,441 Posts
Weight reduction isn't the main reason for latex tubes. They are more supltle and better conform to movement of the tire shape. So the tire complies better to the road surface. That reduces rolling resistance and also a better ride.
#9
just another gosling
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,501
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3873 Post(s)
Liked 1,920 Times
in
1,369 Posts
#10
just another gosling
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,501
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3873 Post(s)
Liked 1,920 Times
in
1,369 Posts
Sometimes those hard to find leaks are at the base of the valve stem and the stem needs to be wiggled around under water to expose the leak. But yes, latex are a little harder to find a leak than butyl. You could also try pumping up the tire mounted on the rim and dunk it in water with 100psi or so and you may at least find the general area where the leak is.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,651
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 835 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
741 Posts
^^Also try inflating the tube and pull to stretch the tube in small sections which may enlarge the hole enough to hear or feel a leak. Hold the tube very close to your nose as it is very sensitive and can feel very small areas of escaping air and there may be a difference in smell. This is main reason why I stopped using latex years ago. Got tired of spending 30+ minutes to find and patch a hole. Plenty of lightweight butyl tubes out there that are as light and ride the same as latex.