Vintage MTB front derailleur questions
#1
Sunshine
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,609
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10954 Post(s)
Liked 7,483 Times
in
4,185 Posts
Vintage MTB front derailleur questions
I got a 90 Diamond Back Ascent EX frameset for cheap and wanted to build it up with Deore Deerhead components I had.
I started a thread a couple months ago about this bike- the crankset I wanted to use wouldn't clear the chainstay. That was a 48-38-28.
I have a 42-32-22 crankset I can use which will clear the chainstays.
But the front derailleur won't fit the arc of then large ring now since the rings are so small.
And the front derailleur will run into the chainstay if I lower it more on the seat tube. As is, it's way too high above the top of the largest ring.
So-
- would a modern front derailleur fit the smaller crank better? any suggestions on what to get that has a compact curve?
- any workarounds anyone can think of? As is. The derailleur is resting on the top of the lowest water cage hole...not sure if I could place a derailleur that fits the curve below that brazeon point and still have the derailleur cage not contact the chainstay.
I thought it'd be $150 and id have a rigid mtb in my size for once and with a cool old group on it.
I didn't figure this many headaches!
I started a thread a couple months ago about this bike- the crankset I wanted to use wouldn't clear the chainstay. That was a 48-38-28.
I have a 42-32-22 crankset I can use which will clear the chainstays.
But the front derailleur won't fit the arc of then large ring now since the rings are so small.
And the front derailleur will run into the chainstay if I lower it more on the seat tube. As is, it's way too high above the top of the largest ring.
So-
- would a modern front derailleur fit the smaller crank better? any suggestions on what to get that has a compact curve?
- any workarounds anyone can think of? As is. The derailleur is resting on the top of the lowest water cage hole...not sure if I could place a derailleur that fits the curve below that brazeon point and still have the derailleur cage not contact the chainstay.
I thought it'd be $150 and id have a rigid mtb in my size for once and with a cool old group on it.
I didn't figure this many headaches!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,092 Times
in
723 Posts
It'a not so much a modern derailleur you need but one which is shaped to fit the diameter of the rings. Microshift makes a few you could try as does Shimano. Examples: microSHIFT -The best control system
Amazon.com : Shimano Altus FD-M190 Front Derailleur Max 42 Cap 18 Clamp Dia 28.6-34.9 Dual, Low Clamp : Front Bike Derailleurs : Sports & Outdoors this one has a low clamp which should clear your bottle boss
or search on "42 t triple front derailleur shimano" or similar
Amazon.com : Shimano Altus FD-M190 Front Derailleur Max 42 Cap 18 Clamp Dia 28.6-34.9 Dual, Low Clamp : Front Bike Derailleurs : Sports & Outdoors this one has a low clamp which should clear your bottle boss
or search on "42 t triple front derailleur shimano" or similar
#3
Sunshine
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,609
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10954 Post(s)
Liked 7,483 Times
in
4,185 Posts
So I can use a low clamp in place of a high clamp? Everything I've ever done to front derailleurs has been while using the original or replacing it with an identical style.
If these can swap(hi or low clamp) without issue, that could solve the issue.
Thanks
If these can swap(hi or low clamp) without issue, that could solve the issue.
Thanks
#4
Really Old Senior Member
Changing the crank & FDER costs how much vs a new BB? That's a totally backwards approach.
#5
Sunshine
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,609
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10954 Post(s)
Liked 7,483 Times
in
4,185 Posts
I agree, a longer bb would have been easiest. I would have loved to just swap it for a longer one, but 130 is it.
As for cost, the current small crank was $15 and a new FD would be $12 probably. Not a huge hit, though it means I am not getting to use all the original components I had hoped for.
Last edited by mstateglfr; 12-20-15 at 09:30 PM.
#6
Really Old Senior Member
Is this a loose bearing/cup BB?
If so, is the spindle in correctly?
Many have a shorter end intended for the NDS.
What's the "code" on the spindle, such as 3T, 3S etc.
If so, is the spindle in correctly?
Many have a shorter end intended for the NDS.
What's the "code" on the spindle, such as 3T, 3S etc.
Last edited by Bill Kapaun; 12-20-15 at 08:30 PM.
#7
Sunshine
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,609
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10954 Post(s)
Liked 7,483 Times
in
4,185 Posts
It's a loose cup n cone.
I pulled the spindle, it's installed to correct way. Appreciate the suggestion, itd be great if it were just an issue of the spindle being on wrong.
Here is a pic of the spindle code.
I pulled the spindle, it's installed to correct way. Appreciate the suggestion, itd be great if it were just an issue of the spindle being on wrong.
Here is a pic of the spindle code.
#8
Really Old Senior Member
Not sure if the 7 is the code, but from Sheldon-
7" series spindles fit "oversized" 73 mm ISO/British bottom brackets.
I don't know if you have a 73mm BB shell, but I thought they were all cartridge???
7" series spindles fit "oversized" 73 mm ISO/British bottom brackets.
I don't know if you have a 73mm BB shell, but I thought they were all cartridge???
#9
Sunshine
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,609
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10954 Post(s)
Liked 7,483 Times
in
4,185 Posts
Yeah, I've read that too- the Sheldon comment.
Its a 73mm shell. Also, this thread from years ago references the same model bike and spindle. Looks like it was what DB spec'd the bike with. https://www.bikeforums.net/bicycle-me...m-bracket.html
And they are for sale on eBay
Vintage Bottom Bracket Spindle MTBS108- 73mm x 127mm -NOS CrMo JIS Square Taper
Its a 73mm shell. Also, this thread from years ago references the same model bike and spindle. Looks like it was what DB spec'd the bike with. https://www.bikeforums.net/bicycle-me...m-bracket.html
And they are for sale on eBay
Vintage Bottom Bracket Spindle MTBS108- 73mm x 127mm -NOS CrMo JIS Square Taper
#10
Constant tinkerer
Pretty much any MTB FD from the 1990s should work with that crank. Low clamp/high clamp shouldn't matter on that frame. What you need to make sure of is top pull versus bottom pull. Some FD's from that era are both. And the clamp diameter (28.6, 31.8, or 34.9) but if it's too big it can always be shimmed.
The local bike co-op around here has boxes of them. I have quite a few myself so if you need something send me a PM.
I'm not sure why your other crank didn't work (was it original???) but that's a different issue.
The local bike co-op around here has boxes of them. I have quite a few myself so if you need something send me a PM.
I'm not sure why your other crank didn't work (was it original???) but that's a different issue.
#11
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
I'm not sure that would help much. From the OP's pictures, it appears he cannot lower the derailleur any closer to the rings without it hitting the chainstay.
The Deore XT derailleur was designed to use larger rings than the OP wants. I think the best solution is a modern derailleur that would both follow the profile of the rings better and allow the cage to be lowered closer to the rings for better performance.
The Deore XT derailleur was designed to use larger rings than the OP wants. I think the best solution is a modern derailleur that would both follow the profile of the rings better and allow the cage to be lowered closer to the rings for better performance.
#12
Sunshine
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,609
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10954 Post(s)
Liked 7,483 Times
in
4,185 Posts
Pretty much any MTB FD from the 1990s should work with that crank. Low clamp/high clamp shouldn't matter on that frame. What you need to make sure of is top pull versus bottom pull. Some FD's from that era are both. And the clamp diameter (28.6, 31.8, or 34.9) but if it's too big it can always be shimmed.
The local bike co-op around here has boxes of them. I have quite a few myself so if you need something send me a PM.
I'm not sure why your other crank didn't work (was it original???) but that's a different issue.
The local bike co-op around here has boxes of them. I have quite a few myself so if you need something send me a PM.
I'm not sure why your other crank didn't work (was it original???) but that's a different issue.
The '89 and '91 cranks are both 48-38-28, so its safe to say the '90 was also that setup. The larger crank I have tried is a Shimano FC-B124 with biopace rings. Its from 1987, I believe. I have tried other 48-38-28 cranks though, 2 others, actually- a Sakae XCT, and another one that was at my local collective. Both had the same issue.
Total mystery.
I will look for a 90s or later FD which is made for a smaller crankset and is both top and bottom pull compatible. Hopefully that will allow the FD to be mounted without interfering with the cage brazeons and also avoid contacting the chainstay.
Thanks for the suggestion.
#13
Sunshine
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,609
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10954 Post(s)
Liked 7,483 Times
in
4,185 Posts
This is for sure what I will do. Thanks for the confirmation on it being a good option to try next.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cynergy
Bicycle Mechanics
6
09-18-18 02:14 PM
Barrettscv
Bicycle Mechanics
6
05-22-11 08:17 AM