Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    portland or
    Posts
    1,888
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    I need some help with my gearing.

    This is on my bent and it is a bit heavy so I need some low end gearing. But when I am cursing my 11-34 cassette has too but space between the cogs. Either I have to spin too fast or two slow. I have 30 42 50 I think the middle is 42
    I have gotten to the point I can do the morning ride all in the second chainring and on the way home only the short really steep parts in the small chainring.
    So I got a 12-26 wanted an 11-28 but I got a good deal. I changed it to an 11-26 and I put a 24t small ring on. Now my regular cruising is good I can find the right cadence but the low end kind of sucks. There is so much torque with that small chainring that my limbo now pogo’s again. Plus it makes the seat squeak (G) now the second chainring is almost too large to start out in and I have to shift to the small ring more. It takes a shift and a half to get back from the small to the middle now too.
    So I went from 11-12-14-16-18-21-24-28-34
    To 12-13-14-15-17-19-21-23-26
    Could I get away with using the 34 and the 28 and dump the 23 and 26? Or I may be able change the 26 to the 28 too. Not sure yet and go back to the 30 chainring. Will this work ok?

  2. #2
    a blend of wit and charm Moochers_Dad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Chicago
    My Bikes
    Serotta Fierte and a 1989 Centurian Prestige (plus, various others)
    Posts
    885
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    portland or
    Posts
    1,888
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    after thinking a bit I can handle 30 28 for those hills. though the 34 is handy to keep from shifting the front using the middle chainring.

  4. #4
    feros ferio John E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
    My Bikes
    1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
    Posts
    14,772
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you don't mind double-shifting, you could try 30-40-50 with your original cogset, for a 1.5-step-plus-grannie system. Through your middle range, 14-16-18-21-24, the ratiometric 40-50 step in front would average 1.5 times each step in back, for a pretty nice interleave. In the mid 1970s, 52-42/14-16-18-21-24 was a VERY popular close-ratio setup, which gave 10 fairly nicely-spaced gears, again if one were willing to shift both derailleurs at times.

    (I do a similar interleave with 50-42 / 13-15-17-19-21-23-26 on the Bianchi and 48-4--24 / 13-15-17-19-21-23-26 on the mountain bike.)
    "Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
    Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
    Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
    Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
    Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    portland or
    Posts
    1,888
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I thought of changing the middle chainring but I spent enough money latly (G) bu I don't want to dump the 52 as with a 26" wheel i need it all for downhills.
    I went with 30 26 then cept the rest i think the next is 19. a ltitle bit of a jump but it was nto a problem today.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •