Your Preferred Tube
#26
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4559 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
The one failure I've had that I would blame on the tube is problems with the tube leaking around the base of the valve stem. I realize there are some wheel issues and installation problems that could cause this, but I'm pretty sure I had tubes from a bad batch. I saw this failure with several tubes that I bought at the same time. Never saw it with any other tube on the same wheels. I stopped buying that brand of tube (Forte) though I admit the odds of this coming up again were probably small.
The rubber around the Schrader valve stem on the Nashbar sealant filled tube looks a bit lumpy, for lack of a better term. Perhaps the manufacturer uses a thicker rubber overall, including around the stem, and it just looks odd compared with other tubes.
I feel like I've seen a lot of tubes packaged under various brand names that have either CST or Kenda stamped on them somewhere. Michelin, Schwalbe and Continental are the only brands that I'm convinced don't come from either of these manufacturers.
But this policy seems to be different for China and Taiwan based brands, which do appear to share more components in common due to differences in their business model. This seems particularly noticeable in the many folding bikes that appear identical other than in the selection of components.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18354 Post(s)
Liked 4,502 Times
in
3,346 Posts
My favorite tubes are the ones that don't leak.
I'm also in the cheapest camp. I do find those ridges annoying for patching, but they all seem to have them.
I've started carrying 25/32 tubes for 25mm tires. I don't have super-deep rims, so most of the valves are OK, although some are a bit of a stretch.
I'm also in the cheapest camp. I do find those ridges annoying for patching, but they all seem to have them.
I've started carrying 25/32 tubes for 25mm tires. I don't have super-deep rims, so most of the valves are OK, although some are a bit of a stretch.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,742
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,865 Times
in
1,439 Posts
I've gotten Continental tubes that didn't have them, but I haven't been able to figure out a way to identify which ones won't. I thought it was related to their "seamless" claim, but I've gotten some that were supposed to be seamless but had the ridges.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#29
Keepin it Wheel
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,244
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 3,417 Times
in
2,526 Posts
Looks like if you want opinions about why fancy tubes are worth the fancy price, you need to go over to the Road forum. I'm sure there's plenty of weight weenies in there that will go on and on about how cheap, heavy tubes slow them down.
#31
Senior Member
I used to run almost exclusively Continental and I'd get 2 or three flats each season, but then I noticed that I wasn't getting any flats on the wheel with the cheap Performance (Forte) tube. I changed over to all Forte tubes about 2 years ago and I haven't had a flat since! Plus, the tires hold pressure longer as well - I only pump them up once a week instead of before each ride. I'm sure it is because the rubber is a little thicker than on the Contis.
#33
Constant tinkerer
I have. I don't think I've gotten a bad one yet. I'm in the "cheapest" group as well. If I have to throw away one defective tube out of 20, I'm still way ahead compared to paying $10 or whatever for a "fancy" tube.
#34
Optically Corrected
#35
Senior Member
Whatever tube is in stock in the size/valve style I need. Brand doesn't matter; I assume most are made in the same plants, just with different packaging.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: North East Tennessee
Posts: 1,616
Bikes: Basso Luguna, Fuji Nevada
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
1 Post
I did find a piece of wire stuck through the tire but it wasn't lined up with where the holes were and I had another tube fail after I took the wire out of the tire. I ended up buying new tires and tubes and throwing the other tires and tubes away. It could have been a fluke, could have been something I did wrong or could have been bed tubes, I don't know but haven't had anymore flats since I replaced tires and tubes. What I replaced the Walmart tubes with were cheap Kenda tubes and cheap Continental tires. I think I got them all on Amazon for a little less than $50 shipped (2 tires and 3 tubes), so kinda cheap.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,676
Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 425 Post(s)
Liked 454 Times
in
313 Posts
No particular brand is particularly favorable. Apart from the obvious things like valve type and tube size/width, some things to consider are valve length (needs to be deep enough for the rim), removable core (e.g., my pump head is a thread-on and it sometimes pulls out the valve core during removal), and weight (I find that the lighter weight tubes ride nicer and are generally not more prone to punctures ). Since I only ride once or twice a week now, I'm running latex tubes with race tires on the road bike and I enjoy it.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,742
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,865 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Don't get me wrong. I understand what you're saying, and I certainly don't question your right to prioritize things the way you want to. For instance, I'm willing to tolerate a couple of flat tires a year in order to avoid the sluggish ride of tires that would prevent these flats. I just wouldn't make that choice with a product that costs $2 versus a product that costs $10 when either one is likely to last for several years if they aren't defective. I'm saying this based on the assumption that said defect isn't immediately obvious upon installation. The cost of the product pro-rated over the life of the product makes both of them extremely cheap, so I'm less inclined to tolerate a noticeable defect rate. It doesn't take much added value for a product that I use several times a week to be worth an extra $8.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
One thing that I've always found funny is the plethora of reviews complaining of bicycle inner tubes "leaking at the seam". Bicycle inner tubes don't have seams. They are vulcanized in one piece. What looks like a seam is the parting line of the mold.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#42
Constant tinkerer
Way ahead in what sense? Is your time not worth something?
Don't get me wrong. I understand what you're saying, and I certainly don't question your right to prioritize things the way you want to. For instance, I'm willing to tolerate a couple of flat tires a year in order to avoid the sluggish ride of tires that would prevent these flats. I just wouldn't make that choice with a product that costs $2 versus a product that costs $10 when either one is likely to last for several years if they aren't defective. I'm saying this based on the assumption that said defect isn't immediately obvious upon installation. The cost of the product pro-rated over the life of the product makes both of them extremely cheap, so I'm less inclined to tolerate a noticeable defect rate. It doesn't take much added value for a product that I use several times a week to be worth an extra $8.
Don't get me wrong. I understand what you're saying, and I certainly don't question your right to prioritize things the way you want to. For instance, I'm willing to tolerate a couple of flat tires a year in order to avoid the sluggish ride of tires that would prevent these flats. I just wouldn't make that choice with a product that costs $2 versus a product that costs $10 when either one is likely to last for several years if they aren't defective. I'm saying this based on the assumption that said defect isn't immediately obvious upon installation. The cost of the product pro-rated over the life of the product makes both of them extremely cheap, so I'm less inclined to tolerate a noticeable defect rate. It doesn't take much added value for a product that I use several times a week to be worth an extra $8.
I realize the numbers might be a little off here but the point is that defective tubes are such a rare almost-non-issue for me that I'll take the cost savings every time.