Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Qs RE: 10-sp chains and reusable master links

Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Qs RE: 10-sp chains and reusable master links

Old 02-27-16, 04:48 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Qs RE: 10-sp chains and reusable master links

About the middle of the 2014 riding season I went back to waxing my chains (10-sp Campy). Now I am a full-fledged wax-aholic. To support my habit, I need chains with infinitely reusable master links because the chain has to come off of the bike every few hundred km. I experimented with re-waxing the chain while it was still on the bike, but the fatal flaw was always the inability to equalize the temperatures of the chain and the (melted) wax, which resulted in less than optimal penetration.

And I've been pressing my luck re-using the PowerLink on a 10-sp SRAM chain, which I bought thinking was reusable, because they used to be, but that has changed. But I dodn't discover that until after I'd reused it a number of times.

I'm primarily interested in a single brand solution (like Connex/X-link), but if anyone has had a positive result with mix-n-match (like ShimaNO/MissingLink), I'd be interested to hear about it, too.

So I'd appreciate everyone sharing their personal experiences.


Among other things, I'm looking at KMC chains, but I note on their website that they recommend no more than 3 uses of the MissingLink. If any of you "runs-with-scissors" types has reused a KMC link significantly more than three times, and lived to tell about it, I'd also be interested to hear that.


My primary concern is shifting quality, in large part because waxing makes a chain deathly silent.

TIA!
NattyBumpo is offline  
Old 02-27-16, 04:53 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,086
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3355 Post(s)
Liked 5,431 Times in 2,810 Posts
I've used a Park MLP-1 with masterlinks from SRAM/KMC/Superlink (both latching and non-latching) and never had the slightest problem with reinstalling them multiple times. There is nothing about the design that makes it a risk. Just remember the link wears with the chain, and should be replaced at the same time.

On the other hand, the *only* link I ever had disconnect in use was a Connex.
Shimagnolo is offline  
Old 02-27-16, 05:05 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: western Massachusetts (greater Springfield area)
Posts: 699

Bikes: Velosolex St. Tropez, LeMond Zurich (spine bike), Rotator swb recumbent

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 67 Times in 32 Posts
I used a KMC link with a shimano chain until the chain wore out, since then I have been using KMC chains with KMC links. I also wax my chains (with graphite mixed in) but I get between 500-1000 miles per treatment, so I have used each link probably 4 or 5 times. However, once I dropped half the link outside when cleaning my bike, so I reused half of an old one I had hanging around. That half went significantly more changes.

I'm not sure the link wears like the chain. My understanding (which may be flawed) is that the wear and elongation occurs in the holes that the pins go through, not in the pins themselves. The holes on the link are not load-bearing, they just keep the link linked. I know my old links look the same as the new ones, just less shiny.
Having said that, the KMC chains (and Nashbar and Performance, which are also KMC) come with a new link, so I do change them when I change the chain.
MikeWMass is offline  
Old 02-27-16, 05:10 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,086
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3355 Post(s)
Liked 5,431 Times in 2,810 Posts
Originally Posted by MikeWMass

I'm not sure the link wears like the chain. My understanding (which may be flawed) is that the wear and elongation occurs in the holes that the pins go through, not in the pins themselves. The holes on the link are not load-bearing, they just keep the link linked. I know my old links look the same as the new ones, just less shiny.
Having said that, the KMC chains (and Nashbar and Performance, which are also KMC) come with a new link, so I do change them when I change the chain.
The holes in the inner plates wear, *and* the surfaces of the pins they rub against also wear.

Superlink had a bad batch around 2000 with soft pins that wore *much* faster than the plates. In just 200 miles you would start to hear the link clicking. Removal would reveal the plates had worn grooves in the pins.
Shimagnolo is offline  
Old 02-27-16, 06:31 PM
  #5  
Super Moderator
 
Homebrew01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,844

Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 921 Times in 608 Posts
Why are some links not reusable ?? I can understand they may not "lock" as tightly after several disconnects, but chains are always under tension, so I wouldn't think they'd pop open from shifting.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.

FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Homebrew01 is offline  
Old 02-27-16, 06:41 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,086
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3355 Post(s)
Liked 5,431 Times in 2,810 Posts
Originally Posted by Homebrew01
Why are some links not reusable ?? I can understand they may not "lock" as tightly after several disconnects, but chains are always under tension, so I wouldn't think they'd pop open from shifting.
It is for hysterical reasons:

The original was the Superlink, and it was patented, and the patent included the words "reusable".

Initially, SRAM licensed the patent for the 8 & 9s links, then decided they didn't want to pay any more money, so they concocted the latching design that was difficult to remove, and called it "non-reusable", and introduced it in the 10s links.

KMC links come in both designs, which is dumb since the patent has expired. There is no good reason to keep producing the latching "non-reusable" version, other than to convince people to needlessly buy more links.
Shimagnolo is offline  
Old 02-27-16, 06:48 PM
  #7  
don't try this at home.
 
rm -rf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,918
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 495 Times in 342 Posts
I used Connex on all my 10-speed chains. It's extremely easy to remove without tools. (But don't let either end of the chain go flying or it'll fling the half connector across the room!) I used the same link on two or three chains, then replaced it "just in case", but it looked fine.

Connex doesn't have an affordable version for 11 speed, so now I'm using Sram links. (Connex prices: 10 speed are around $12-13, but 11 speed are $30.) But I rarely remove the chain to clean it anymore. I just wipe it clean with paper towels dampened with rubbing alcohol and apply more lube. The chain still lasts a long time.

As an amateur mechanic, I always use quick links. I can replace my chain using a simple chain tool and not worry about getting the special pin installed correctly.

Last edited by rm -rf; 02-27-16 at 06:54 PM.
rm -rf is offline  
Old 02-27-16, 06:55 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times in 741 Posts
Originally Posted by Homebrew01
Why are some links not reusable ??
If what I read is correct, SRAM has to claim their Powerlink is not reusable because they have a design patent conflict with someone (KMC?) if their link is advertised as reusable. Mechanically, I agree with you that there is no reason it shouldn't be.
HillRider is offline  
Old 02-27-16, 06:59 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times in 741 Posts
Originally Posted by rm -rf
I used Connex on all my 10-speed chains. It's extremely easy to remove without tools. (But don't let either end of the chain go flying or it'll fling the half connector across the room!) I used the same link on two or three chains, then replaced it "just in case", but it looked fine.
I certainly agree the Connex is the class act of reusable master links and by far the easiest to R&R. However, I never use a link beyond the life of the chain it was originally installed on. New chain = new link.
HillRider is offline  
Old 02-28-16, 11:12 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
ramzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Fernandina Beach FL
Posts: 3,605

Bikes: Vintage Japanese Bicycles, Tange, Ishiwata, Kuwahara

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 700 Post(s)
Liked 321 Times in 251 Posts
It's all about KMC for me. Easiest link design out there. Plus, they're pretty cheap.
ramzilla is offline  
Old 02-28-16, 08:17 PM
  #11  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MikeWMass
...I also wax my chains (with graphite mixed in)....
C'mon, now, you can't just tease me and leave me like that. Where do you get the graphite (I'm assuming it's powdered), what sort of ratio/amounts are you mixing it at, and what change did you see in the performance of the wax?
NattyBumpo is offline  
Old 02-28-16, 09:03 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
woodcraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times in 569 Posts
I had some work done on my bike at the shop,

& the mechanic re-used the power link.

When I questioned that, he said "wut?'

In fact, I think he was pretty competent,

& I have reused that same link a number of times.
woodcraft is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
imobilinpedalus
Bicycle Mechanics
46
06-02-18 04:17 AM
carl7
Bicycle Mechanics
18
08-02-17 09:26 PM
Campagnono
Bicycle Mechanics
8
07-16-14 06:11 PM
loimpact
Bicycle Mechanics
14
03-13-14 03:44 AM
ErichM
Road Cycling
30
10-20-10 10:00 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.