Qs RE: 10-sp chains and reusable master links
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Qs RE: 10-sp chains and reusable master links
About the middle of the 2014 riding season I went back to waxing my chains (10-sp Campy). Now I am a full-fledged wax-aholic. To support my habit, I need chains with infinitely reusable master links because the chain has to come off of the bike every few hundred km. I experimented with re-waxing the chain while it was still on the bike, but the fatal flaw was always the inability to equalize the temperatures of the chain and the (melted) wax, which resulted in less than optimal penetration.
And I've been pressing my luck re-using the PowerLink on a 10-sp SRAM chain, which I bought thinking was reusable, because they used to be, but that has changed. But I dodn't discover that until after I'd reused it a number of times.
I'm primarily interested in a single brand solution (like Connex/X-link), but if anyone has had a positive result with mix-n-match (like ShimaNO/MissingLink), I'd be interested to hear about it, too.
So I'd appreciate everyone sharing their personal experiences.
Among other things, I'm looking at KMC chains, but I note on their website that they recommend no more than 3 uses of the MissingLink. If any of you "runs-with-scissors" types has reused a KMC link significantly more than three times, and lived to tell about it, I'd also be interested to hear that.
My primary concern is shifting quality, in large part because waxing makes a chain deathly silent.
TIA!
And I've been pressing my luck re-using the PowerLink on a 10-sp SRAM chain, which I bought thinking was reusable, because they used to be, but that has changed. But I dodn't discover that until after I'd reused it a number of times.
I'm primarily interested in a single brand solution (like Connex/X-link), but if anyone has had a positive result with mix-n-match (like ShimaNO/MissingLink), I'd be interested to hear about it, too.
So I'd appreciate everyone sharing their personal experiences.
Among other things, I'm looking at KMC chains, but I note on their website that they recommend no more than 3 uses of the MissingLink. If any of you "runs-with-scissors" types has reused a KMC link significantly more than three times, and lived to tell about it, I'd also be interested to hear that.
My primary concern is shifting quality, in large part because waxing makes a chain deathly silent.
TIA!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,086
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3355 Post(s)
Liked 5,431 Times
in
2,810 Posts
I've used a Park MLP-1 with masterlinks from SRAM/KMC/Superlink (both latching and non-latching) and never had the slightest problem with reinstalling them multiple times. There is nothing about the design that makes it a risk. Just remember the link wears with the chain, and should be replaced at the same time.
On the other hand, the *only* link I ever had disconnect in use was a Connex.
On the other hand, the *only* link I ever had disconnect in use was a Connex.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: western Massachusetts (greater Springfield area)
Posts: 699
Bikes: Velosolex St. Tropez, LeMond Zurich (spine bike), Rotator swb recumbent
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 67 Times
in
32 Posts
I used a KMC link with a shimano chain until the chain wore out, since then I have been using KMC chains with KMC links. I also wax my chains (with graphite mixed in) but I get between 500-1000 miles per treatment, so I have used each link probably 4 or 5 times. However, once I dropped half the link outside when cleaning my bike, so I reused half of an old one I had hanging around. That half went significantly more changes.
I'm not sure the link wears like the chain. My understanding (which may be flawed) is that the wear and elongation occurs in the holes that the pins go through, not in the pins themselves. The holes on the link are not load-bearing, they just keep the link linked. I know my old links look the same as the new ones, just less shiny.
Having said that, the KMC chains (and Nashbar and Performance, which are also KMC) come with a new link, so I do change them when I change the chain.
I'm not sure the link wears like the chain. My understanding (which may be flawed) is that the wear and elongation occurs in the holes that the pins go through, not in the pins themselves. The holes on the link are not load-bearing, they just keep the link linked. I know my old links look the same as the new ones, just less shiny.
Having said that, the KMC chains (and Nashbar and Performance, which are also KMC) come with a new link, so I do change them when I change the chain.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,086
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3355 Post(s)
Liked 5,431 Times
in
2,810 Posts
I'm not sure the link wears like the chain. My understanding (which may be flawed) is that the wear and elongation occurs in the holes that the pins go through, not in the pins themselves. The holes on the link are not load-bearing, they just keep the link linked. I know my old links look the same as the new ones, just less shiny.
Having said that, the KMC chains (and Nashbar and Performance, which are also KMC) come with a new link, so I do change them when I change the chain.
Superlink had a bad batch around 2000 with soft pins that wore *much* faster than the plates. In just 200 miles you would start to hear the link clicking. Removal would reveal the plates had worn grooves in the pins.
#5
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,844
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 921 Times
in
608 Posts
Why are some links not reusable ?? I can understand they may not "lock" as tightly after several disconnects, but chains are always under tension, so I wouldn't think they'd pop open from shifting.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,086
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3355 Post(s)
Liked 5,431 Times
in
2,810 Posts
The original was the Superlink, and it was patented, and the patent included the words "reusable".
Initially, SRAM licensed the patent for the 8 & 9s links, then decided they didn't want to pay any more money, so they concocted the latching design that was difficult to remove, and called it "non-reusable", and introduced it in the 10s links.
KMC links come in both designs, which is dumb since the patent has expired. There is no good reason to keep producing the latching "non-reusable" version, other than to convince people to needlessly buy more links.
#7
don't try this at home.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,918
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 495 Times
in
342 Posts
I used Connex on all my 10-speed chains. It's extremely easy to remove without tools. (But don't let either end of the chain go flying or it'll fling the half connector across the room!) I used the same link on two or three chains, then replaced it "just in case", but it looked fine.
Connex doesn't have an affordable version for 11 speed, so now I'm using Sram links. (Connex prices: 10 speed are around $12-13, but 11 speed are $30.) But I rarely remove the chain to clean it anymore. I just wipe it clean with paper towels dampened with rubbing alcohol and apply more lube. The chain still lasts a long time.
As an amateur mechanic, I always use quick links. I can replace my chain using a simple chain tool and not worry about getting the special pin installed correctly.
Connex doesn't have an affordable version for 11 speed, so now I'm using Sram links. (Connex prices: 10 speed are around $12-13, but 11 speed are $30.) But I rarely remove the chain to clean it anymore. I just wipe it clean with paper towels dampened with rubbing alcohol and apply more lube. The chain still lasts a long time.
As an amateur mechanic, I always use quick links. I can replace my chain using a simple chain tool and not worry about getting the special pin installed correctly.
Last edited by rm -rf; 02-27-16 at 06:54 PM.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
If what I read is correct, SRAM has to claim their Powerlink is not reusable because they have a design patent conflict with someone (KMC?) if their link is advertised as reusable. Mechanically, I agree with you that there is no reason it shouldn't be.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
I used Connex on all my 10-speed chains. It's extremely easy to remove without tools. (But don't let either end of the chain go flying or it'll fling the half connector across the room!) I used the same link on two or three chains, then replaced it "just in case", but it looked fine.
#10
Senior Member
It's all about KMC for me. Easiest link design out there. Plus, they're pretty cheap.
#11
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
C'mon, now, you can't just tease me and leave me like that. Where do you get the graphite (I'm assuming it's powdered), what sort of ratio/amounts are you mixing it at, and what change did you see in the performance of the wax?
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
I had some work done on my bike at the shop,
& the mechanic re-used the power link.
When I questioned that, he said "wut?'
In fact, I think he was pretty competent,
& I have reused that same link a number of times.
& the mechanic re-used the power link.
When I questioned that, he said "wut?'
In fact, I think he was pretty competent,
& I have reused that same link a number of times.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Campagnono
Bicycle Mechanics
8
07-16-14 06:11 PM
loimpact
Bicycle Mechanics
14
03-13-14 03:44 AM