Columbus Metax fork and quill stem to carbon & ahead: upgrade or splashing out money?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 5
Bikes: Benotto 800
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Columbus Metax fork and quill stem to carbon & ahead: upgrade or splashing out money?
Hello. I own a bicycle built around a Columbus Metax frame. With Shimano 105 groupset it weights around 10kg.
I was considering replacing the front, the fork and stem with carbon and ahead stem.
How much weight could I possibly save? From what I reckoned a steel road fork can weight up to 700 grams, quill stem about 285, headset is similar I guess.
A carbon form is about 350 grams, stem 150, so all together the saving will be 500 grams. Will that be in any way worth the price?
I'm thinking in terms of weight and comfort feel and rather than racing advantage.
I was considering replacing the front, the fork and stem with carbon and ahead stem.
How much weight could I possibly save? From what I reckoned a steel road fork can weight up to 700 grams, quill stem about 285, headset is similar I guess.
A carbon form is about 350 grams, stem 150, so all together the saving will be 500 grams. Will that be in any way worth the price?
I'm thinking in terms of weight and comfort feel and rather than racing advantage.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Llano Estacado
Posts: 3,702
Bikes: old clunker
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 684 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 105 Times
in
83 Posts
[h=2]Columbus Metax fork and quill stem to carbon & ahead: upgrade or splashing out money?[/h]Hello. I own a bicycle built around a Columbus Metax frame. With Shimano 105 groupset it weights around 10kg.
I was considering replacing the front, the fork and stem with carbon and ahead stem.
How much weight could I possibly save? From what I reckoned a steel road fork can weight up to 700 grams, quill stem about 285, headset is similar I guess.
A carbon form is about 350 grams, stem 150, so all together the saving will be 500 grams. Will that be in any way worth the price?
I'm thinking in terms of weight and comfort feel and rather than racing advantage.
I was considering replacing the front, the fork and stem with carbon and ahead stem.
How much weight could I possibly save? From what I reckoned a steel road fork can weight up to 700 grams, quill stem about 285, headset is similar I guess.
A carbon form is about 350 grams, stem 150, so all together the saving will be 500 grams. Will that be in any way worth the price?
I'm thinking in terms of weight and comfort feel and rather than racing advantage.
And, no one here can decide what's worth what for you.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Yes, a "typical" steel fork does weigh in the 700 gm neighborhood and the stem weight you estimate isn't that far off either. However, a 350 gm carbon fork is pretty high end and 400+ grams is more typical. Headsets typically weigh 120 to 150 grams so you aren't going to save much there.
So for a 400 gm or so weight savings you are going to spend $200 or a lot more to reduce your 10 kg bike to 9.6 Kg for a 4% weight loss. And, if you expect a carbon fork to be a dramatic comfort improvement, you will be very disappointed.
So for a 400 gm or so weight savings you are going to spend $200 or a lot more to reduce your 10 kg bike to 9.6 Kg for a 4% weight loss. And, if you expect a carbon fork to be a dramatic comfort improvement, you will be very disappointed.
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 5
Bikes: Benotto 800
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yes, a "typical" steel fork does weigh in the 700 gm neighborhood and the stem weight you estimate isn't that far off either. However, a 350 gm carbon fork is pretty high end and 400+ grams is more typical. Headsets typically weigh 120 to 150 grams so you aren't going to save much there.
So for a 400 gm or so weight savings you are going to spend $200 or a lot more to reduce your 10 kg bike to 9.6 Kg for a 4% weight loss. And, if you expect a carbon fork to be a dramatic comfort improvement, you will be very disappointed.
So for a 400 gm or so weight savings you are going to spend $200 or a lot more to reduce your 10 kg bike to 9.6 Kg for a 4% weight loss. And, if you expect a carbon fork to be a dramatic comfort improvement, you will be very disappointed.
Thanks for clarifying this. That's a good way to think about it, in percent of total weight.
I did some research on parts to estimate weights, and I assumed front end of the bike is the most sensible to start with. The cranks, mechs and seatpost are either freshly replaced or not much of a candidate for a weight saver. Maybe the chain and the cassette are better as they get wear down with time anyways, but that's 150 grams at most, and quite expensive too.
Thanks again!
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 766
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I think you might have a difficult time finding a 1" threadless carbon fork, especially if you are looking for a full-carbon and not carbon with steel or aluminum steerer. !" threadless stem aren't too common either, although you could get a 1 1/8" stem and use a shim.
#6
Calamari Marionette Ph.D
Unless you lose that .5 kilo from the wheels, you probably won't even be able to notice it. A bottle of water weighs more.