Why aren't off-center rear rims more common?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
Why aren't off-center rear rims more common?
In the past decade, I've wondered why off-center rims haven't become more popular for rear wheels. For people unfamiliar, OC rims have the spoke holes off-center, to minimize the effective dishing of the wheels, and have less difference in tension between drive-side and non-drive-side spokes. This allows a wheel that is less likely to have fatigue failure of non-drive-side spokes, or drive-side spokes pulling through the rim because tension is too high. OC rims seem to be similar weight to their symmetrical counterparts (some, like Velocity Aerohead, are lighter).
Possible reasons why these haven't become more popular:
* I've heard there may be trademark or patent royalties involved
* bike companies like to just order more of the same part. Witness most bikes using equal spoke count for front and rear wheels for decades, even though front wheels are under far less stress than rear.
* consumers don't like the asymmetrical look of off-center rims
* consumers don't care about the practical value of off-center rims
* there are technical concerns that limit the value of off-center rims (e.g., asymmetry makes them a bit less aerodynamic)
* the dish and spoke tension problem they are solving is fairly minor
Here's a visual of how OC rims affect dish, and gives you an idea of the asymmetrical shape:
OCR Rim_.jpg
Possible reasons why these haven't become more popular:
* I've heard there may be trademark or patent royalties involved
* bike companies like to just order more of the same part. Witness most bikes using equal spoke count for front and rear wheels for decades, even though front wheels are under far less stress than rear.
* consumers don't like the asymmetrical look of off-center rims
* consumers don't care about the practical value of off-center rims
* there are technical concerns that limit the value of off-center rims (e.g., asymmetry makes them a bit less aerodynamic)
* the dish and spoke tension problem they are solving is fairly minor
Here's a visual of how OC rims affect dish, and gives you an idea of the asymmetrical shape:
OCR Rim_.jpg
Last edited by TallRider; 01-24-17 at 11:48 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,075
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,859 Times
in
2,307 Posts
Two different stocking and manufacturing specs for what's otherwise the same situation. When you pay the bills you get to decide this. Andy
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
For the huge majority of riders who don't pop rear spokes often enough to be genuinely troubled by it, OC rims offer an improvement that doesn't provide any actual ride advantage.
Sometimes there's no difference in use between "good enough" and "better".
Sometimes there's no difference in use between "good enough" and "better".
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,903
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,931 Times
in
1,212 Posts
I suspect this has a grain of truth in it, although possibly not how dabac meant it.
Some huge fraction of bicycles bought are ridden for a season, put away, and never used again. Call it 90% are ridden 500 miles or less. Any rim with halfway decent spokes and machine build will last that long. OC rims are going to be more expensive to fabricate, source, stock (double your rim SKUs), and build with, just because somebody's got to turn them right way 'round if they're flipped. Of the 10% of bikes that are ridden further, some fraction (call it half) are ridden with no load and light riders. Since it's cheaper and just as good for maybe 95% of all bikes made, they're all made with centered rims. Inertia takes over for problem wheels. How many of us who have had problems with wheels started the replacement process with, "here's what it had when it was new, I want another one just like it?"
#5
Senior Member
At a 2.5mm offset the NDS tension is 68% and at 0 offset it is 57% on a 700 series road wheel. Doesn't seem like enough to make a big difference.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,710
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5781 Post(s)
Liked 2,576 Times
in
1,427 Posts
IMO - it's more about marketing than anything else. The benefits are too difficult to explain and so don't command a premium. So since the bike company can't expect a commercial benefit form OC rims, they don't see it as worth the bother.
Also, the issue isn't that bad, and it's certainly not smart to discuss issues of rear wheel dish when trying to sell bikes.
As a practical matter, I've been building trouble free wheels for decades, and I'm most definitely not the only one.
Also, the issue isn't that bad, and it's certainly not smart to discuss issues of rear wheel dish when trying to sell bikes.
As a practical matter, I've been building trouble free wheels for decades, and I'm most definitely not the only one.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#7
Si Senior
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Naperville, Illinois
Posts: 2,669
Bikes: Too Numerous (not)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
8 Posts
All of my bikes use OC rear rims (except for the IGHs). I liked the idea and definitely notice a difference when building wheels. I do it for longevity but have no clue if it helps anything.
Last edited by dbg; 01-25-17 at 10:51 AM.
#8
Nigel
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,991
Bikes: 1980s and 1990s steel: CyclePro, Nishiki, Schwinn, SR, Trek........
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 384 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
An alternative is to use different diameter spokes on the DS and NDS. For example 2.0/1.7/2.0 on the DS and 1.8/1.5/1.8 on the NDS; with a standard rim result in very near equal tensile stress in all the spokes - and a very robust wheel.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,710
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5781 Post(s)
Liked 2,576 Times
in
1,427 Posts
As for any benefit, my feeling is that as long as a wheel lasts until killed by a pothole or crash or the brake track wears through, any longer fatigue life is meaningless.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#10
Banned
cost.. people want to pay less, even bike forum writers..
so getting 10,000+ rims and using them for both wheels helps the bottom line..
OP wants to pony up the cost of a hand-built wheel for themselves, is welcome to do So.
...
so getting 10,000+ rims and using them for both wheels helps the bottom line..
OP wants to pony up the cost of a hand-built wheel for themselves, is welcome to do So.
...
Last edited by fietsbob; 01-25-17 at 12:20 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,513 Times
in
2,856 Posts
After a friend told me about them, I tried one on my next build, and I am sold on them.
All 3 of my road bikes have either Velocity Synergy O/C or Aerohead O/C on the rear, (built by myself).
IIRC, on the one with Campy 10s, the NDS tension difference was 44% of DS with symmetric rim, vs 66% with O/C rim
All 3 of my road bikes have either Velocity Synergy O/C or Aerohead O/C on the rear, (built by myself).
IIRC, on the one with Campy 10s, the NDS tension difference was 44% of DS with symmetric rim, vs 66% with O/C rim
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
This is helpful. It sounds like the main reasons are
a) manufacturers want to minimize sku count, so build wheels with same rim front and rear: same spoke count and same dimension
b) the dish/tension problem to be solved is really fairly minimal with a well-built wheel
I'm 200# and built 32-spoke wheels (Sun M13II) 10 years ago for my main bike, and after many thousands of miles the wheel has stayed true, despite using the same butted spokes on drive-side and non-drive-side. (I should have gone for differential with stiffer spokes on drive-side).
I'm particularly interested in OC rims for building up really old 122mm-spaced frame with modern gearing range. I've spread dropouts from 126mm to 130mm, but am less comfortable with going from 122 to 130. Going with an OC rim and thicker spokes on the drive-side would allow me to use 126mm rear spacing with an 8/9/10-speed drivetrain without having a weak rear wheel.
a) manufacturers want to minimize sku count, so build wheels with same rim front and rear: same spoke count and same dimension
b) the dish/tension problem to be solved is really fairly minimal with a well-built wheel
I'm 200# and built 32-spoke wheels (Sun M13II) 10 years ago for my main bike, and after many thousands of miles the wheel has stayed true, despite using the same butted spokes on drive-side and non-drive-side. (I should have gone for differential with stiffer spokes on drive-side).
I'm particularly interested in OC rims for building up really old 122mm-spaced frame with modern gearing range. I've spread dropouts from 126mm to 130mm, but am less comfortable with going from 122 to 130. Going with an OC rim and thicker spokes on the drive-side would allow me to use 126mm rear spacing with an 8/9/10-speed drivetrain without having a weak rear wheel.
#13
Really Old Senior Member
This is helpful. It sounds like the main reasons are
a) manufacturers want to minimize sku count, so build wheels with same rim front and rear: same spoke count and same dimension
b) the dish/tension problem to be solved is really fairly minimal with a well-built wheel
I'm 200# and built 32-spoke wheels (Sun M13II) 10 years ago for my main bike, and after many thousands of miles the wheel has stayed true, despite using the same butted spokes on drive-side and non-drive-side. (I should have gone for differential with stiffer spokes on drive-side).
I'm particularly interested in OC rims for building up really old 122mm-spaced frame with modern gearing range. I've spread dropouts from 126mm to 130mm, but am less comfortable with going from 122 to 130. Going with an OC rim and thicker spokes on the drive-side would allow me to use 126mm rear spacing with an 8/9/10-speed drivetrain without having a weak rear wheel.
a) manufacturers want to minimize sku count, so build wheels with same rim front and rear: same spoke count and same dimension
b) the dish/tension problem to be solved is really fairly minimal with a well-built wheel
I'm 200# and built 32-spoke wheels (Sun M13II) 10 years ago for my main bike, and after many thousands of miles the wheel has stayed true, despite using the same butted spokes on drive-side and non-drive-side. (I should have gone for differential with stiffer spokes on drive-side).
I'm particularly interested in OC rims for building up really old 122mm-spaced frame with modern gearing range. I've spread dropouts from 126mm to 130mm, but am less comfortable with going from 122 to 130. Going with an OC rim and thicker spokes on the drive-side would allow me to use 126mm rear spacing with an 8/9/10-speed drivetrain without having a weak rear wheel.
On spreading the dropouts-
Once you spread past about 6mm, the dropouts aren't very parallel. I was "eating" DS cones and think that might be the reason??? I think it actually put a bend in the axle when clamped.
#14
Full Member
I think most Fulcrum rims are asymmetrical even the Fulcrum 7 and the wheelset costs around 150-180 bucks. DT Swiss makes a few asymmetrical rims too and i'm sure there are a few more I don't know about.
#15
Senior Member
Tallrider, IIRC the asymmetrical rear rims were designed to allow rear wheel dish to be closer to that of a 7S hub on 8S+ hubs. At the time there was concern by some that the amount of dish required to fit the wider free hub may result is a markedly weaker wheel. This concern has been largely erased and was done so fairly quickly, resulting in so few OC rims now available.
That written, I like the concept and I have an asymmetrical rim on my mountain bike and a new touring bike wheel set will be built with an asymmetrical rear rim.
Brad
That written, I like the concept and I have an asymmetrical rim on my mountain bike and a new touring bike wheel set will be built with an asymmetrical rear rim.
Brad
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Deep South
Posts: 1,335
Bikes: Cannondale SR's and ST's from the '80's
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 340 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 46 Times
in
20 Posts
Being another tall person (and girthier than I used to be,) I have several bikes with OC rimmed rear wheels.
I have used Ritchey Aero OC, in road bike applications; Velocity Synergy OC, Bontrager Fairlane OC on
touring wheels, and am preparing to build a set of wheels with Velocity A23 OC rear rim.
Whenever possible I have paired these OC rims with Ritchey Zero system hubs for wheels with almost NO dish, or at least they would have almost no dish if I didn't tinker further.
Most of my rides, road and touring, are older Cannondales with 126mm rear dropout spacing.
I KNOW that there are many who just cram a 130mm rear hub into their older 'Dale frames, and all is good, but I choose not to do that.
So, removal of 4mm of NDS spacer and redishing the wheel 2mm to the DS takes care of things.
So, the OC rims and Ritchey hubs really help.
I only wish I could find those hubs in 36°. Supposedly used on Jamis Aurora touring bikes for a couple of years, but I have never found any.... In those instances I use Shimano Ultegra hubs, which have a 5mm NDS spacer.
I have used Ritchey Aero OC, in road bike applications; Velocity Synergy OC, Bontrager Fairlane OC on
touring wheels, and am preparing to build a set of wheels with Velocity A23 OC rear rim.
Whenever possible I have paired these OC rims with Ritchey Zero system hubs for wheels with almost NO dish, or at least they would have almost no dish if I didn't tinker further.
Most of my rides, road and touring, are older Cannondales with 126mm rear dropout spacing.
I KNOW that there are many who just cram a 130mm rear hub into their older 'Dale frames, and all is good, but I choose not to do that.
So, removal of 4mm of NDS spacer and redishing the wheel 2mm to the DS takes care of things.
So, the OC rims and Ritchey hubs really help.
I only wish I could find those hubs in 36°. Supposedly used on Jamis Aurora touring bikes for a couple of years, but I have never found any.... In those instances I use Shimano Ultegra hubs, which have a 5mm NDS spacer.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
The OC rim solves a nearly non-existant problem for most riders and introduces manufacturing and inventory problems of its own. And, yes, good enough is really good enough.
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
Tallrider, IIRC the asymmetrical rear rims were designed to allow rear wheel dish to be closer to that of a 7S hub on 8S+ hubs. At the time there was concern by some that the amount of dish required to fit the wider free hub may result is a markedly weaker wheel. This concern has been largely erased and was done so fairly quickly, resulting in so few OC rims now available.
I agree with HillRider and others that for most riders and most situations (including myself) this is not an issue.
#19
Senior Member
My bike came with Shimano RS10 wheels with an OC rear rim. The OC may or may not help, but the wheel has other issues.
Broke one NDS spoke after about 3,500 miles. Broke another about 250 miles later. I weigh between 205 and 210# and the wheel has just 20 spokes. They are pretty beefy spokes, even the nipples are oversized and need a non-standard spoke wrench. Both spokes broke right where they enter the nipple.
The problem appears to be the rim holds the nipple vertical, so the spoke bends out slightly where it exits the nipple and fatigues there.
Shimano doesn't make these spokes anymore. I've looked at getting other straight pull spokes and rebuilding it, but by the time I'm done it will be $70. Doesn't seem worth it as I will still have a 20 spoke wheel.
Broke one NDS spoke after about 3,500 miles. Broke another about 250 miles later. I weigh between 205 and 210# and the wheel has just 20 spokes. They are pretty beefy spokes, even the nipples are oversized and need a non-standard spoke wrench. Both spokes broke right where they enter the nipple.
The problem appears to be the rim holds the nipple vertical, so the spoke bends out slightly where it exits the nipple and fatigues there.
Shimano doesn't make these spokes anymore. I've looked at getting other straight pull spokes and rebuilding it, but by the time I'm done it will be $70. Doesn't seem worth it as I will still have a 20 spoke wheel.