Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-26-05, 10:45 AM   #1
angrystan
Member
Thread Starter
 
angrystan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Austin TX
Bikes: 2004 Bianchi Ocelot, 1986 Mariushi CT-12
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Rider too short, handlebars too far out.

I've got a Bianchi Ocelot, their bottom of the line generic ATB, used as an in-town daily driver. I have trouble after a few miles holding my head up and my hands hurt. After much research, trial and error and so forth I realize a stubby guy like me requires handlebars much closer than the OEM setup.

The only changes I've made to the bike so far are replacing the tires with Specialized Nimbus EX 26-1.50s and the stock pedals with great big $8 platforms off the shelf of my LBS which fit my EEEE feet better.

In fact, my practically antique upright tourer I can ride all day without issues. I finally looked to see that the tourer's bars are four inches and change closer to the center of the seat than the Bianchi. I want to alter the threadded-stem Bianchi, on the cheap, to acheive this effect. I presume a new/another stem and new/another handlebar are in order, but I can't work out what to get and or do.

Basically I'm looking for a strategy, but equipment recommendations would be really swell.
angrystan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-05, 11:02 AM   #2
jeff williams
I couldn't car less.
 
jeff williams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Bikes: Ritchey P-series prototype, Diamondback, Nishiki Triathelon Pro.
Posts: 4,395
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Maybe an adjustable stem.
You have a 1 1/8 threaded system, called a Quill stem.

Riser bars also can move your hands up and back.

Last edited by jeff williams; 05-26-05 at 11:17 AM.
jeff williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-05, 01:28 PM   #3
John E
feros ferio
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Bikes: 1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
Posts: 17,299
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 135 Post(s)
Since my Peugeot PKN-10E is too big for me (57cm instead of 55, with a proportionately too-long top tube), I replaced the handlebar stem with the shortest-reach one I could find. It doesn't look as graceful as an average-reach stem, but it works out extremely well for me.
__________________
"Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-05, 06:59 PM   #4
pgoat
BatŁwŁ Griekgriek
 
pgoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Bikes: 1985 Trek 500, 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2002 Orbea Team Euskaltel, 2005 Cannondale R1000
Posts: 2,900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
This will compromise your pedaling position but for on the cheap you could always nudge your saddle forward.
pgoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-05, 03:13 AM   #5
MichaelW
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Bikes:
Posts: 12,932
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
An adjustable stem may work, its a bit heavy and will not be as stiff.
You can get quill stems down to a couple of cm in length. Is it for a 1" or 1 1/8" steerer?
To replace, you usually have to take all the fittings off the bars and slide them through the clamp, then refit everything. Front-loading clamps make life much eaier.
One of the better touring-style bike shops may help with a short quill.
Try Harris, Rivendell etc.

When comparing your MTB position to your tourer, make sure that all the points of contact match up. Check the crank length, the pedal-saddle relation, then the saddle-bar relation.
MichaelW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-05, 06:12 AM   #6
pgoat
BatŁwŁ Griekgriek
 
pgoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Bikes: 1985 Trek 500, 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2002 Orbea Team Euskaltel, 2005 Cannondale R1000
Posts: 2,900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
I pretty much had the same problem with my early 90s mtb. My early 90s body liked its long low cockpit for off road pounding, but now my crusty old body uses it as a commuter, so I needed to shorten the reach.

I tried moving the saddle forward (I had previously always jammed it rear to the max - ahhh the flexibility of my past ) but with a 75 degree ST that put me in TT position! I also had trouble finding shorter stems (the original - a 1 1/8" quill - was super long). Using the old trick of standing next to the bike with an elbow at the front of the saddle, my fingers were just short of the stem bolt! (they should be within and inch or two of the bars.... )

What I wound up doing, instead of converting to threadless stem/fork or getting a quill to thrdlss converter (which would give you a far better choice of shorter stems), was scouring all LBSs until I scored a short extension, tall quill, upward sweeping 1 1/8" quill stem (NOS, $18) from a shop's obsolete bin. I had to improvise a front brake boss, because my bike's antiquated design had the original boss/pulley built into its stem.

It's a heavy alloy stem and it uglified the bike quite a bit, but By raising the bars to just below the saddle with the shorter stem, My elbow/saddle test is within proper range and on the bike I am much more comfy with no hand issues after rides.

Good luck!
pgoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-05, 06:17 AM   #7
pgoat
BatŁwŁ Griekgriek
 
pgoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Bikes: 1985 Trek 500, 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2002 Orbea Team Euskaltel, 2005 Cannondale R1000
Posts: 2,900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
btw, the stem I found was a black generic looking Delta. It must be mid-late 90s because it does have the front bar clamp. I wound look for inexpensive stems for people who want a more upright position - hence a long quill, short extension and/or upright rise.

Up until recently these were easy to find thru nashbar or performance but now that thrdlss is the norm, they sell converters and thrdlss stems. Not a terrible idea, but prolly more pricey in the end.
pgoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-05, 06:38 AM   #8
balto charlie
Senior Member
 
balto charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baltimore/DC
Bikes:
Posts: 2,480
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Many stores sell upright bars. These will change your position to a more hybrid style and less mnt style. Essentially more upright. You will lose speed but in crease your comfort level. It will be easy to do.
balto charlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-05, 08:15 AM   #9
operator
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Posts: 28,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Don't try and squeeze yourself onto a bike that's too big. You'll only end up hurting yourself. Seat position and stem length is not for compensating for a too big frame or too small frame.
operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-05, 01:19 PM   #10
pgoat
BatŁwŁ Griekgriek
 
pgoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Bikes: 1985 Trek 500, 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2002 Orbea Team Euskaltel, 2005 Cannondale R1000
Posts: 2,900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by operator
Don't try and squeeze yourself onto a bike that's too big. You'll only end up hurting yourself. Seat position and stem length is not for compensating for a too big frame or too small frame.

This is true - I have been making adjustments gradually over the years and am used to my bike (bought new in '93 or so) but I would absolutely not buy that same bike today. I'd buy a shorter top tube, if not a smaller bike overall.
pgoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-05, 02:00 PM   #11
angrystan
Member
Thread Starter
 
angrystan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Austin TX
Bikes: 2004 Bianchi Ocelot, 1986 Mariushi CT-12
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by pgoat
I pretty much had the same problem with my early 90s mtb. My early 90s body liked its long low cockpit for off road pounding, but now my crusty old body uses it as a commuter, so I needed to shorten the reach.

I tried moving the saddle forward (I had previously always jammed it rear to the max - ahhh the flexibility of my past ) but with a 75 degree ST that put me in TT position! I also had trouble finding shorter stems (the original - a 1 1/8" quill - was super long). Using the old trick of standing next to the bike with an elbow at the front of the saddle, my fingers were just short of the stem bolt! (they should be within and inch or two of the bars.... )

What I wound up doing, instead of converting to threadless stem/fork or getting a quill to thrdlss converter (which would give you a far better choice of shorter stems), was scouring all LBSs until I scored a short extension, tall quill, upward sweeping 1 1/8" quill stem (NOS, $18) from a shop's obsolete bin. I had to improvise a front brake boss, because my bike's antiquated design had the original boss/pulley built into its stem.

It's a heavy alloy stem and it uglified the bike quite a bit, but By raising the bars to just below the saddle with the shorter stem, My elbow/saddle test is within proper range and on the bike I am much more comfy with no hand issues after rides.

Good luck!
You know what, you were pretty much where I am. I think I know what I'm doing this weekend. Namely hitting the old school LBSes and looking for that mythic long-quill, short reach stem. Than you.
angrystan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-05, 02:07 PM   #12
angrystan
Member
Thread Starter
 
angrystan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Austin TX
Bikes: 2004 Bianchi Ocelot, 1986 Mariushi CT-12
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by pgoat
This is true - I have been making adjustments gradually over the years and am used to my bike (bought new in '93 or so) but I would absolutely not buy that same bike today. I'd buy a shorter top tube, if not a smaller bike overall.
Okay, I know I should have selected with greater discretion but the bike was $279 new and rides like a Cadillac. The test drive around the block sold me and it was a few weeks before I figured out something was wrong. Sure, I could dump it without sacrificing too much, but I have a need to fiddle with it before she winds up on Craig's List.

BTW, I've already moved the saddle forward which didn't really get me where I wanted to be but I think my pedaling position is better.
angrystan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-05, 02:12 PM   #13
pgoat
BatŁwŁ Griekgriek
 
pgoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Bikes: 1985 Trek 500, 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2002 Orbea Team Euskaltel, 2005 Cannondale R1000
Posts: 2,900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
They're out there, just keep looking. Try poking around craig's list too - someone may have swapped to a longer stem or converted to thrdlss at some point; a used stem in exc like new condition should be finefor you. Maybe the wtb/fs board here at BF?

I checked this morning on my commute and my hub is pefectly obscured by the handlebar so I managed to really dial it in right. With the stock stem i was way off with locked elbows. All those tests, btw, are just gross methods of seeing if you are in the ball park. Go with what feels good, both on the bike and afterwards.

happy hunting!!!
pgoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-05, 03:39 PM   #14
angrystan
Member
Thread Starter
 
angrystan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Austin TX
Bikes: 2004 Bianchi Ocelot, 1986 Mariushi CT-12
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelW
An adjustable stem may work, its a bit heavy and will not be as stiff.
You can get quill stems down to a couple of cm in length. Is it for a 1" or 1 1/8" steerer?
To replace, you usually have to take all the fittings off the bars and slide them through the clamp, then refit everything. Front-loading clamps make life much eaier.
One of the better touring-style bike shops may help with a short quill.
Try Harris, Rivendell etc.
I know an old school shop just up the street which carries Rivendell bikes and presumably can order parts, although I fear those might be a bit precious for my budget. I plan to go in and at least talk to them about the situation anyway ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelW
When comparing your MTB position to your tourer, make sure that all the points of contact match up. Check the crank length, the pedal-saddle relation, then the saddle-bar relation.
I will go back and look at the geometry closer, with these tips in mind. Thank you.
angrystan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-05, 12:03 AM   #15
pgoat
BatŁwŁ Griekgriek
 
pgoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Bikes: 1985 Trek 500, 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2002 Orbea Team Euskaltel, 2005 Cannondale R1000
Posts: 2,900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
This is another thought - if there is a good pro cycling shop near you, you may want to go for a fit session. Probably pricey overkill, but it would let you know if your current bike's frame is way off/unsuited for you.

I plan to do this before my next purchase which I reckon will be a road or cyclocross bike in the 2-3 grand range.
pgoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-05, 09:10 AM   #16
Wiswell
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 446
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have the opposite problem. My reach is too short on my Raleigh C-30 (2003). I didn't realize this until I upgraded to a road bike, then got back on the Raleigh for short rides or errands. I think I need about another inch (the Raleigh is a 16, and I believe a 17 or 17.5 would have been best). I'm trying to convert the Raleigh to a commuter. Is there a part on the handebars I can replace that will extend the reach without making the handling poor? I've got the saddle and pedals adjusted ok, I just feel like I'm scrunched.

Unrelated question - I've got 700 x 35 tires on the Raleigh. I want to reduce down to 700 x 32, but I can't figure out what the equivalent tire size is (they are not sold as 700 X 32). Sheldon Brown's site didn't clarify it either. Can someone just tell me? Is 26 x 1.25 about right?
Wiswell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-05, 09:23 AM   #17
schang
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 152
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiswell
Is there a part on the handebars I can replace that will extend the reach without making the handling poor? I've got the saddle and pedals adjusted ok, I just feel like I'm scrunched.
Replace your stem with one that has a couple cm more extension. Unless your stem is already very long, I don't think this will have a very big impact on handling.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiswell
Unrelated question - I've got 700 x 35 tires on the Raleigh. I want to reduce down to 700 x 32, but I can't figure out what the equivalent tire size is (they are not sold as 700 X 32). Sheldon Brown's site didn't clarify it either. Can someone just tell me? Is 26 x 1.25 about right?
26" is not the same as or interchangeable with 700c. Keep looking, there are definitely 700c tires sold in 32 mm widths and they are not rare (see http://sheldonbrown.com/harris/tires/622.html for instance). In addition, many tires labeled "35" will actually be closer to 32mm wide when mounted on the wheel.
schang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-05, 09:58 AM   #18
MichaelW
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Bikes:
Posts: 12,932
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
When you say that the bars of your tourer are closer than your MTB commuter bike, to which part of the drop bars are you measuring. If you usually cruise using the brake hoods, then you should measure to that point, which is usually about 4" further away from the tops/stem.
MichaelW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-05, 11:07 AM   #19
dbg
Si Senior
 
dbg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Naperville, Illinois
Bikes: Too Numerous (not)
Posts: 2,632
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
The picture (link) you supply shows you already have a riser stem with minimal forward reach. I doubt there's much you can do with any stem to improve your position. Your best bet is probably with handlebars that sweep back towards you. You could use handlebars that rise upward a bit, and then roll them toward you. Otherwise change bikes, or stretch your body.
dbg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:54 AM.